Abstract
Academic literature on the global financial crisis (GFC) continues unabated, prompted in large part by the lack of any profound changes arising in its aftermath. In addition to the sifting of evidence, researchers are using the opportunity to test theories and apply new meta-theoretical tools. Unfortunately, particularly in the case of the latter, the claims made on their behalf are insufficiently supported by the results of their application. The most insightful and revealing of the studies under review here are the most conventional with respect to methodology and theory.
Grant, W. and Wilson, G. K. (eds) (2012)
McKeen-Edwards, H. and Porter, A. (2013)
Rethel, L. and Sinclair, T. J. (2012)
Thompson, G. F. (2012)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
