The ‘Orange Revolution’ in Ukraine is widely considered to be an instance of the ‘coloured revolutions’ of 1989 engendered by democratic values and nascent civil societies in the process of nation building. The article examines the extent to which the ‘Orange Revolution’ could be considered a revolutionary event stimulated by civil society, or a different type of political activity (a putsch, coup d’état), legitimated by elite-sponsored ‘soft’ political power. Based on public opinion poll data and responses from focus groups, the author contends that what began as an orchestrated protest against election fraud developed into a novel type of political activity—a revolutionary coup d’état. It is contended that the movement was divisive rather than integrative and did not enjoy widespread popular support. The article considers why sponsored democracy promotion and western-inspired ‘soft power’ politics have failed.
AshT. G. (1990) We, the People: The Revolutions of '89 (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
2.
AslundA. (2007) How Capitalism was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
3.
AslundA. and McFallM. (eds) (2006) Revolution in Orange. The Origins of Ukraine's Democratic Breakthrough (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment).
4.
BeissingerM.R. (2007) ‘Structure and example in modular political phenomena: The diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions’, Perspectives on Politics, 5:2, 259–276.
5.
Berg-SchlosserD. (2007) ‘The quality of post-communist democracy’, in WhiteS.BattJ. and LewisP.G. (eds), Developments in Central and East European Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 264–275.
6.
D'AnieriP. (2006) ‘Explaining the success and failure of post-communist revolutions’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39:3, 331–350.
GoodwinJ. (2001) No Other Way Out. States and Revolutionary Movements 1945–1991 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
10.
GrodskyB. (2007) ‘Looking at Solidarnozc in Central Asia: The role of human rights organizations in political change’, Slavic Review, 66:3, 442–462.
11.
GurrT. R. (1970) Why Men Rebel (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press).
12.
HerdG. P. (2005) ‘Colourful revolutions and the CIS: “Manufactured” versus “managed” democracy’, Problems of Post-communism, 52:2, 3–17.
13.
KaratnyckyA. (2005) ‘Ukraine's Orange Revolution’, Foreign Affairs, March/April 2005. Available online at: http://www.foreignaffairs.org/2005 (accessed 10 August 2007).
14.
KaratnyckyA. (2006) ‘The fall and rise of Ukraine's political opposition: From Kuchmagate to the Orange Revolution’, in AslundA. and McFallM. (eds), Revolution in Orange. The Origins of Ukraine's Democratic Breakthrough (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment), 29–44.
15.
KumarK. (2001) 1989: Revolutionary Ideas and Ideals, Minneapolis (University of Minnesota Press).
16.
KuzioT. (2005) ‘Regime type and politics in Ukraine under Kuchma’, Communist and Post-communist Studies, 38:2, 167–190.
17.
KuzioT. (ed.) (2007) ‘Democratic revolution in Ukraine: From Kuchmagate to Orange Revolution’, Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 23:1(Special edition).
18.
LaneD. (2006) ‘Civil society formation and accountability in the new post-socialist EU member states’, in PleinesH. (ed.), Participation in New Modes of Governance. The Case of the New EU Member States (No. 74) (Bremen: Forschungsstelle Osteuropa), 7–21.
19.
LaneD. (2007) ‘Introduction: Outcomes of transformation’, in LaneD. (ed.), The Transformation of State Socialism: System Change, Capitalism or Something Else? (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 1–32.
20.
MooreB. (1967) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (London: Allen Lane).
21.
NarochnitskayaN. (ed.) (2008) Oranzhevye Seti: ot Belgrada do Bishkeka (St Petersburg: Aletey).
22.
Natsional'na (2007) Natsional'na Akademiya Nauk Ukraini, Institut Sotsiologii, Ukrains'ke suspil'stvo 1992–2007 (Kiev: Akademiya Nauk Ukraini).
23.
NyeJ. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Public Affairs).
24.
PaninaN. (2006) Ukraynsk'e suspil'stvo: sotsiologichni monitoring 1992–2006 (Kiyv: Institute sotsiologii NAN Ukraini).
25.
ScocpolT. (1979) States and Social Revolutions (New York: Cambridge University Press).
26.
StarkD. and BrusztL. (2001) ‘One way or multiple paths: For a comparative sociology of East European Capitalism’, American Journal of Sociology, 106:4, 1129–1137.
27.
StepanenkoV. (2005) ‘How Ukrainians view their Orange Revolution: Public opinion and the national peculiarities of citizenry political activities’, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 13:4, 595–618.
28.
TanterR. and MidlarskyM. (1967) ‘A theory of revolution’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11:3, 264–280.
29.
TillyC. (1993) European Revolutions 1492–1992 (Oxford: Blackwell).
30.
UNDP (1990) Human Development Report 1990 (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press).
31.
WayL. A. (2005) ‘Rapacious individualism and political competition in Ukraine, 1992–2004’, Communist and Post-communist Studies, 38:2, 191–205.
32.
WilsonA. (2005) Ukraine's Orange Revolution (New Haven CT and London: Yale University Press).
