Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

High‐tech organizations often struggle to manage different types of R&D projects. Evidence from research and practice suggests that managers frequently categorize and manage projects based on the extent of change triggered in product, process, technology, and market dimensions. However, this can create challenges in high‐tech organizations. This study investigates how high‐tech organizations manage R&D projects based on their learning goals. First, we argue for the benefits of categorizing R&D projects based on the degree of exploration and exploitation learning goals. A qualitative case study from four high‐tech business units involving 10 R&D projects helps understand the different types of projects based on their learning goals. The case study shows that R&D projects in high‐tech organizations typically fall into three categories based on their learning goals: Radical innovation projects, Incremental innovation projects, and Hybrid projects. Second, we iterate between literature and evidence from our qualitative data to theorize how project context and organizational context affect project performance depending on the type of project. The data for the empirical analysis come from a multilevel survey of 110 R&D projects across 34 high‐tech business units. Results show the importance of designing project and organizational context differently for the three types of R&D projects. Collectively, this study offers a new perspective on how to manage high‐tech R&D projects.

Keywords

exploration exploitation R&D projects innovation team effectiveness high‐tech organizations qualitative data survey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

Cole

. 1992. Designed for learning: A tale of two auto plants. Sloan Management Review 34: 85–94.

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

Ancona

D. G.

Caldwell

D. F.

. 1992. Bridging the boundary: External activity in performance in organizational teams. Adm. Sci. Q. 37: 634–665.

Arnold

H. J.

1982. Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic and psychometric issues. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 29: 143–174.

Atkinson

R. C.

Shriffin

R. M.

. 1971. The control of short term memory. Sci. Am. 225(2): 82–90.

Bagozzi

R. P.

Phillips

L. W.

. 1982. Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Adm. Sci. Q. 27: 459–489.

Bajaj

Kekre

Srinivasan

. 2004. Managing NPD: Cost and schedule performance in design and manufacturing. Manage. Sci. 50(4): 527–536.

Bass

B. M.

1998. Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

Beckman

Sinha

K. K.

. 2005. Conducting academic research with an industry focus: Production and operations management in the high tech industry. Prod. Oper. Manag. 14(2): 115–124.

10.

Brown

S. L.

Eisenhardt

. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time‐paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Adm. Sci. Q. 42: 1–34.

11.

Burgelman

Christensen

Wheelwright

. 2008. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. McGraw Hill, New York, NY.

12.

Burns

1978. Leadership. Harper and Row, New York, NY.

13.

Burton

Obel

. 2004. Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA.

14.

Calinski

Harabasz

. 1974. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun. Stat. 3: 1–27.

15.

Cardinal

L. B.

2001. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organ. Sci. 12(1): 19–36.

16.

Carrillo

2005. Industry clockspeed and the pace of new product development. Prod. Oper. Manag. 14(2): 125–141.

17.

Carrillo

Gaimon

. 2004. Managing knowledge based resource capabilities under uncertainty. Manage. Sci. 50(11): 1504–1518.

18.

Cassiman

Veugelers

. 2006. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition Manage. Sci. 52(1): 68–82.

19.

Chandrasekaran

Mishra

. 2012. Task design, team context and psychological safety: An empirical analysis of R&D projects. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21(6): 977–996.

20.

Chandrasekaran

Linderman

Schroeder

R. G.

. 2012. Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high‐technology organizations. J. Oper. Manag. 30(1–2): 134–151.

21.

Chao

Kavidias

. 2008. A theoretical framework for managing the new product development portfolio: When and how to use strategic buckets. Manage. Sci. 54(5): 907–921.

22.

Chao

Kavadias

Gaimon

. 2009. Revenue driven resource allocation: Funding authority, incentives and NPD portfolio management. Manage. Sci. 55(9): 1556–1569.

23.

Christensen

C. M.

Raynor

M. E.

. 2003. The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

24.

Clark

Fujimoto

. 1991. Product Development Performance: Strategy Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry. HBS Publishing, Boston, MA.

25.

Cohen

Bailey

D. E.

. 1997. What makes team work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Manag. 23(3): 239–290.

26.

Cohen

West

S. G.

Aiken

L. S.

. 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, NJ.

27.

Daft

. 2008. Organization Theory and Design. South Western College Publishing, Mason, OH.

28.

Denison

Hart

Kahn

. 1996. From chimneys to cross‐functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Acad. Manag. J. 39(4): 1005–1023.

29.

Dewar

Dutton

. 1986. The adoption of radical and incremental innovation: An Empirical Analysis. Manage. Sci. 32(11): 1422–1433.

30.

Eisenbeiss

S. A.

vanKnipeenberg

Boerner

. 2008. Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. J. Appl. Psychol. 93(6): 1438–1446.

31.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

1985. Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Manage. Sci. 31(2): 134–149.

32.

Eisenhardt

1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4): 532–550.

33.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

Tabrizi

B. N.

. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in global computer industry. Adm. Sci. Q. 40(1): 84–110.

34.

Fine

C. H

. 1998. Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. Perseus Books, New York: NY.

35.

Gerwin

Barrowman

N. J.

. 2002. An evaluation of research on integrated product development. Manage. Sci. 48(7): 938–953.

36.

Gibson

C. B.

Birkinshaw

. 2004. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Manag. J. 47(2): 209–226.

37.

Gilbert

2005. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resources versus routine rigidity. Acad. Manag. J. 48(5): 741–763.

38.

Girotra

Terweisch

Ulrich

. 2007. Valuing R&D projects in a portfolio: Evidence from pharmaceutical industries. Manage. Sci. 53(9): 1452–1466.

39.

Gladstein

1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Adm. Sci. Q. 29(4): 499–517.

40.

Greene

W. H.

2002. Econometric Analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

41.

Gupta

A. K.

Smith

Shalley

C. E.

. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Manag. J. 49(4): 693–706.

42.

Haas

M. R.

2010. The double edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Acad. Manag. J. 53(5): 989–1008.

43.

Hackman

J. R.

2002. Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. HBS Press, Boston, MA.

44.

Hair

J. F.

Black

W. C.

Babin

Anderson

. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

45.

Z. L.

Wong

P. K.

. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. 15(4): 481–494.

46.

Hoegl

Weinkauf

Gemuenden

H. G.

. 2004. Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in mutliteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organ. Sci. 15(1): 38–55.

47.

Holmes

. 2008. RIM, Apple may gain from Motorola split, The Street.com. Available at http://www.thestreet.com/newsanalysis/techtelecom/10409509.html (accessed date January 19, 2012).

48.

Holmqvist

2004. Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organ. Sci. 15(1): 70–81.

49.

Homburg

Jensen

Krohmer

. 2008. Configurations of marketing and sales. A taxonomy. J. Mark. 72(2): 133–154.

50.

Hutchinson‐Krupat

Kavadias

. 2014. Strategic Resource Allocation: Top‐Down, Bottom‐Up, and the value of strategic buckets. Manage. Sci. Article in Advance Management Science http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1861.

51.

Hutson

Sakkab

. 2006. Connect and develop: Inside Procter and Gamble's new model for innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. March: 1–10.

52.

Hyatt

D. E.

Ruddy

T. M.

. 1997. An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Pers. Psychol. 50(3): 553–585.

53.

Jansen

J. P.

Tempelaar

van denBosch

F. A. J.

Volberda

H. W.

. 2009a. Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 20(4): 797–811.

54.

Jansen

J. P.

Vera

Crossan

. 2009b. Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Leadersh. Quart. 20(1): 5–18.

55.

Jehn

K. A.

Northcraft

G. B.

Neale

M. A.

. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Adm. Sci. Q. 44(4): 741–763.

56.

Kavadias

Chao

, 1999. Resource allocation and new product development portfolio management. In Handbook of New Product Development Management. (p.135–164). Butterworth‐Heinemann, Oxford: UK.

57.

Kavadias

Chao

, 2007. Resource allocation and new product development portfolio management. In Handbook of New Product Development Management. (p.135–164). Butterworth‐Heinemann, Oxford: UK.

58.

Kenny

D. A.

Voie . 1985. Separating individual and group effects. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48(5): 339–348.

59.

Kirkman

B. L.

Shapiro

D. L.

. 2001. The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self‐managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Acad. Manag. J. 44(3): 557–569.

60.

Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

. 2000. Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions and New Directions. Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

61.

Levinthal

March

. 1993. The Myopia of Learning. Strateg. Manag. J. 14: 95–112.

62.

Lewis

M. W.

Welsh

M. A.

Dehler

G. E.

Green

S. G.

. 2002. Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of project management. Acad. Manag. J. 45(3): 546–564.

63.

Bingham

J. B.

Umphress

E. E.

. 2007. Fairness from the top: Perceived procedural justice and collaborative problem solving in new product development. Organ. Sci. 18(2): 200–216.

64.

Loch

Kavadias

. 2007. Handbook of New Product Development Management. Butterworth‐Heinemann, Oxford, UK.

65.

MacMillan

I. C.

McGrath

R. G.

. 2002. Crafting R&D project portfolios. Res. Technol. Manag. 45(5): 48–59.

66.

Mathieu

Maynard

M. T.

Rapp

Gilson

. 2008. Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J. Manag. 34(3): 410–476.

67.

McEvily

Perrone

Zaheer

. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. 14(1): 91–103.

68.

McIntyre

R. M.

Blashfield

R. K.

. 1980. A nearest‐centroid technique for evaluating the minimum‐variance clustering procedure. Multivar. Behav. Res. 15(2): 225–238.

69.

McKinsey Global Report . 2010. R&D after crisis. Available at http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/RD_after_the_crisis_McKinsey_Global_Survey_Results_2576 (accessed January 19, 2012).

70.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, New York, NY.

71.

Miller

J. G.

Roth

A. V.

. 1994. A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Manage. Sci. 40(3): 285–304.

72.

Milligan

Cooper

M. C.

. 1987. Clustering methods. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 11(4): 329–354.

73.

Morse

J. M.

1997. Perfectly Healthy, but Dead: The Myth of Inter‐Rater Reliability. Qualitat. Health Res. 24(7): 445–447.

74.

Narayanan

Balasubramanian

Swaminathan

S. J.

. 2011. Managing outsourced software projects: An analysis of project performance and customer satisfaction. Prod. Oper. Manag. 20(4): 508–521.

75.

O'Reilly

Tushman

. 2004. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. April:74–81.

76.

Ouchi

1979. A conceptual framework for the design of organization control mechanisms. Manage. Sci. 25(9): 833–848.

77.

Peng

Heim

G. R.

Mallick

D. N.

. 2013. Collaborative product development: The effect of project complexity on the use of information technology tools and new product development practices. Production and Operations Management Early View http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01383.x/abstract

78.

Rabe‐Hesketh

Skrondal

. 2008. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. Stata Press, Texas.

79.

Rae

2007.Debate: six sigma vs. innovation. Business Week. February 2007.

80.

Rand

W. M.

1971. Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66: 846–850.

81.

Rosing

Frese

Bausch

. 2011. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership‐innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. Leadersh. Quart. 22: 956–974.

82.

Ross

1973. The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem. Am. Econ. Rev. 63: 134–139.

83.

Sarin

Mahajan

. 2001. The effect of reward structures on the performance of cross functional product development teams. J. Mark. 65(2): 35–53.

84.

Sethi

Iqbal

Sethi

. 2012. Developing new‐to‐the firm products: The role of micropolitical strategies. J. Mark. 76(2): 99–115.

85.

Shadish

W. R.

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

. 2002. Experimental and Quasi‐Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, NY.

86.

Shenhar

A. J.

Dvir

. 1996. Toward a typological theory of project management. Res. Policy 25(4): 607–632.

87.

Siemsen

2008. The hidden perils of career concerns in R&D organizations. Manage. Sci. 54(5): 863–877.

88.

Sommer

Loch

Dong

. 2009. Managing complexity and unforseeable uncertainity in starup companies: An empirical study. Organ. Sci. 20(1): 118–133.

89.

Stewart

G. L.

2006. A meta‐analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. J. Manag. 32(1): 29–54.

90.

Swink

Talluri

Pandejpong

. 2006. Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs. J. Oper. Manag. 24(5): 542–562.

91.

Tatikonda

M. V.

Rosenthal

S. R.

. 2000. Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process. J. Oper. Manag. 18: 401–425.

92.

Terweisch

Loch

. 1999. Measuring the effectiveness of overlapping development activities. Manage. Sci. 45(4): 455–465.

93.

Terweisch

Ulrich

. 2009. Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities. Harvard Business Review, Boston, MA.

94.

Thompson

L. L.

2004. Making the Team: A Guide for Managers. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

95.

Venkataraman

1989. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(3): 423–444.

96.

Vera

Crossan

. 2004. Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Acad. Manag. Rev. 29(4): 222–240.

97.

Vidgen

Wang

. 2009. Coevolving systems and the organization of agile software development. Inf. Syst. Res. 20(3): 329–354.

98.

Ward

J. H.

Jr . 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58(301): 236–244.

99.

Wheelwright

S. C.

Clark

. 1992. Creating project plans to focus product development. Harvard Bus. Rev. March‐April:1–14.

100.

Yin

R. K.

2003. Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

101.

Zellmer‐Bruhn

Gibson

C. B.

. 2006. Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 49(3): 501–518.

102.

Zschocke

M. S.

Mantin

Jewkes

E. M.

. 2013. The effect of competition on R&D portfolio investments. Prod. Oper. Manag. Early View http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01376.x/abstract

The Role of Project and Organizational Context in Managing High‐tech R&D Projects

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References