This article examines the relevance of place branding as a political phenomenon in international politics. After setting place branding in a historical and conceptual context, it maps out the connections between branding and international politics by looking at three examples. First, it examines the challenges facing the European Union to strengthen its image as a global player. Second, it analyzes the efforts of the United States to deal with its collapsing image in the aftermath of its failing “war on terror” and military intervention in Iraq. Third, it examines negative place branding by focusing on the Borat movie that upset Kazakhstan in 2006 and the cartoon crisis that erupted in Denmark in September 2005. This article also aims to situate the practice of place branding in a broader analytical context. It argues that place branding is part of a wider spectrum of postmodern power, where soft power and public diplomacy also have their place.
Anholt, Simon.2002. Foreword. Journal of BrandManagement9 (4-5): 229-39.
4.
BBC News. 2006a. Cartoons row hits Danish exports . September 9. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5329642.stm.
5.
———. 2006b. Muslim cartoon row timeline. February 19. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4688602.stm .
6.
Beers, Charlotte L.2003. Prepared testimony before the Committee on Foreign Relations of the United States Senate on “American Public Diplomacy and Islam .” 108th Cong., 1st sess, February 27. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
7.
Blechman, Barry M.2005. Book review: Nye's Soft power. Political Science Quarterly119 (4): 680-81.
8.
Bounds, Andrew.2006. Brand experts study EU identity crisis. Financial Times, May 1.
9.
Businessweek.2006. Best global brands2006. http://bwnt.businessweek.com/brand/2006/index.asp .
10.
Cerny, Philip G.1997. Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition32 (2): 251-74.
11.
Checkel, Jeffrey T.1998. Norms, institutions and national identity in contemporary Europe. ARENA Working Papers 16, Center for European Studies, University of Oslo, Norway.
12.
Cukier, Kenneth Neil.2005. No joke. December 28. Foreignaffairs.org .
13.
Cull, Nicholas J.2007. Public diplomacy: Lessons from the past. Unpublished Report for the British FCO. http://annenberg.usc.edu/images/pdfs/pubd/cull_pd_report_for_fco_final_version.pdf .
14.
Daily Mail. 2006. Bush to hold talks on Ali G creator after diplomatic row. September 12.
15.
Day, Julia.2002. Swiss move to ban Bin Laden fashion line. The Guardian, January 18.
16.
The Economist. 2001. The case for brands. September 6.
17.
European Commission.2000. Shaping the new Europe. 9.2. COM (2000) 154 final. Brussels: European Commission.
18.
European Commission. n.d. http://www.nu.nl/news/995726/50/Europese_Commissie_wil_in_Second_Life.html.
19.
Foreign Policy.2001. Brand U.S.A. 127:19.
20.
Grossberg, Josh.2005. Kazakhstan on Borat: Not nice. E! News, November 14. http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=f9fa2c94-d9d2-4728-9e50-89ebdeab72e0 .
21.
Haass, Richard N.1997. The reluctant sheriff. The United States after the cold war. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
22.
Hale, John.1993. The Renaissance idea of Europe. In European identity and the search for legitimacy, ed. Soledad Garcia, 48. London: Pinter.
23.
Harding, Luke.2006. How one of the biggest rows of modern times helped Danish exports to prosper. The Guardian, September 30.
24.
Holbrooke, Richard.2001. Get the message out. Washington Post, October 28.
25.
Hopf, Ted.1998. The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security23 (1): 176.
26.
International Herald Tribune. 2006. Kazakh anger has yet to subside over Borat. October 21.
27.
Kunczik, Michael.1997. Images of nations and international public relations . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
28.
Lewis, Elen.2003. Branding war and peace. Brand Strategy167:28.
29.
Lindsay, Marsha.2000. The brand calledWisconsin™: Can we make it relevant and different for competitive advantage? Economic Summit White Paper2000. http://www.wisconsin.edu/summit/archive/2000/papers/pdf/lindsay.pdf.
30.
Little, Richard, and Steve Smith, eds. 1988. Belief systems and international relations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
31.
Manners, Ian2002. Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms ? Journal of Common Market Studies40 (2): 235-58.
32.
McCrone, David.1998. The sociology of nationalism: Tomorrow's ancestors . London: Routledge.
33.
Melissen, Jan, ed. 2006. The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations. New York: Palgrave.
34.
Neumann, Iver B.1996. Russia and the idea of Europe: A study in identity and international relations. London: Routledge.
35.
Nye, Joseph. S.2004a. Soft power and American foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly119 (2): 256.
36.
———. 2004b. Soft power: The means to success in world politics . New York: Public Affairs.
37.
———. 2006. Springing tiger. India Today, October2, p. 11.
38.
Olins, Wally.1999. Trading identities: Why countries and companies are taking on each others' roles. London: Foreign Policy Center.
39.
———. 2002. Branding the nation—The historical context . Journal of Brand Management9 (4-5): 241-48.
40.
Ortega, Martin, ed. 2004. Global views on the European Union. Paris: EU-ISS.
41.
Packard, Vance.1957. The hidden persuaders. New York : Mackay & Co.
42.
Pew Global Attitudes Project.2007. Global unease with major world powers. Washington, DC: Pew.
43.
Radosh, Daniel.2004. The Borat doctrine. The New Yorker .
44.
Rengger, Nicholas.1997. The ethics of trust in world politics. International Affairs73 (3): 469-87.
45.
River Path Associates.2007. Evaluation and the new public diplomacy. Presentation to the Future of Public Diplomacy Conference, Wilton Park , UK. http://uscpublicdiplomacy.com/pdfs/WiltonPark.pdf .
46.
Rosamond, Ben.2005. Conceptualizing the EU model of governance in world politics . European Foreign Policy Review10 (4): 478.
47.
Sain, Peter.2006. In search of a European brand. EuropaWorld , May 4.
48.
Sauer, Abram.2006. Borat vs. Kazakhstan—Identity crisis? October 30. Brandchannel.com.
49.
TimesOnline.2007. 70,000 gather for violent Pakistan cartoons protest. February 15. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article731005.ece.
50.
van Gelder, Sicco.2002. A view on the future of branding. Manuscript.
51.
van Ham, Peter.2001. The rise of the brand state. Foreign Affairs80 (5): 2-6.
52.
———. 2002. Branding European territory: Inside the wonderful worlds of PR and IR theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies31 (2): 249-69.
53.
———. 2005. Branding European power. Journal of Place Branding1 (2): 122-26.
54.
———. 2006. Europe, war, and territory. In State territoriality and European integration, ed. Michael Burgess and Hans Vollaard.London: Routledge.
55.
Weber, Cynthia.1995. Simulating sovereignty. Intervention, the state and symbolic exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Wendt, Alexander.1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Williamson John.2001. Putting the fizz back into the Tory Party. http://www.wolff-olins.com/Press2001tory.htm.
