The article reviews the key question of the effects of television as proposed by Elihu Katz in his introduction and the various responses to it in the contributions to this volume. It argues that the question is a proper concern of sociology, engaged as it is with the politics of the present and immediate, short-term effects. The question of long-term effects, however, is beyond the scope of a social science methodology concerned with the impact of the new. Long-term effects only show up with the passing of time and are the concern of historical studies. As television begins to have a history, it begins to be possible to examine its historical record to try to tease out its long-term impact on the world—so far!
Adorno, T., and M. Horkheimer. [1946]1986. Dialectic of enlightenment . London: Verso.
2.
Baron, S.A., E.N. Lindquist, and E.E. Shevlin.2007. Agent of change; print culture studies after Elizabeth L. Eisenstein. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
3.
Blondheim, Menahem, and Tamar Liebes.2009. "Television newsand the nation: The end?"Annals of the American Academcy of Political and Social Science, 625:182-195.
4.
Braudel, F.1980. On history. London, UK: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
5.
Bremer, J., and H. Roodenberg.1993. A cultural history of gesture. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
6.
Burke, P.1993. The art of conversation. Cambridge , UK: Polity.
7.
Cantril, H., H. Gaudet, and H. Herzog.1940. The invasion from Mars: A study in the psychology of panic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Dayan, Daniel.2009. "Sharing and showing: Television as monstration."Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625:19-31.
9.
Dayan, D., and E. Katz.1992. Media events. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Douglas, S.1994. Where the girls are: Growing up female with the mass media . New York: Times Books.
11.
Eisenstein, E.1979. The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformations in early modern Europe. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Ellis, John.2009. "The performance on television of sincerely felt emotion."Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science , 625:103-115.
13.
Frosh, Paul.2009. "The face of television."Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625:87-102.
14.
Giddens, A.1991. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge , UK: Polity.
15.
Goffman, E. [ 1959] 1971. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth, UK: Pelican .
16.
Goodin, R., Rice, M., Parpo, A., and Eriksson, L.2008. Discretionary time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Hall, S., and M. Jacques.1989. New times. London : Lawrence and Wishart.
18.
Harvey, D.1989. The condition of postmodernity. Oxford , UK: Blackwell.
19.
Heilbroner, R.L.1994. Do machines make history? In Does technology drive history? The dilemmas of technological determinism, ed. M. R. Smith and L. Marx.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
20.
Hutchby, I.2006. Media talk: Conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting . Milton Keynes, PA: Open University Press.
21.
Innis, H.1962. The fur trade in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
22.
Katz, E., and P. Lazarsfeld.1955. Personal influence. The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
23.
Lazarsfeld, P., and R.K. Merton.1948/2004. Mass communication, popular taste and organized social action. In Mass communication and American social thought, ed. J. D. Peters and P. Simonson, 230-41. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
Livingstone, Sonia.2009. "Half a century of television in the lives of our children."Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science , 625:151-163.
25.
Lotz, A.2006. Redesigning women: Television after the network era. Urbana-Champagne: University of Illinois Press.
26.
Lunt, Peter.2009. "Television, public participation, and public service: From value consensus to the politics of identity."Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625:128-138.
27.
---. 2007. The television will be revolutionized. New York: New York University Press.
28.
Merton, R.K. [ 1946] 2004. Mass persuasion. Edited and with an Introduction by P. Simonson. New York: Howard Fertig.
29.
Meyrowitz, J.1985. No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
---. 1994. Medium theory. In Communication theory today, ed. D. Crowley and D. Mitchell. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
31.
---. 2003. Canonic anti-text: Marshall McLuhan’s Understanding media. In Canonic texts in media research, ed. E. Katz , J. D. Paters , T. Liebes and A. Orloff.Cambridge, UK: Polity .
32.
---. 2009. "We liked to watch: Television as progenitor of the surveillance society."Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625:32-48.
33.
Montgomery, M.2007. The discourse of broadcast news. London : Routledge.
34.
Press, Andrea.2009. "The end of television: Gender and family in television’s golden age and beyond."Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625:139-150.
35.
Price, Monroe E.2009. "End of television and foreign policy."Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625:196-204.
36.
Putnam, R.D.2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
37.
Robinson, John P and Steven Martin.2009. "Of time and television."Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625:74-86.
38.
Scannell, Paddy.2008. The question of technology. In Narrating media history, ed. M. Bailey.London: Routledge.
39.
Spigel, L.1992. Make room for TV: Television and the family ideal in post-war America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Tolson, A.2006. Media talk. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
41.
Whannel, Garry.2009. "Television and the transformation of sport."Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625:205-218.
42.
Williams, R. [ 1958] 1962. Culture and society. Harmondsworth, UK: Pelican.
43.
---. 1974. Television: Technology and cultural form. London: Fontana.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
