This article is a critical examination of how capitalism has adapted to the explosion of websites devoted to user-generated content (commonly referred to as social media or Web 2.0). The author proceeds by reviewing how Marx applies the concepts of alienation and exploitation to his paradigmatic example (i.e., the factory); the author then attempts to extend the logic of both concepts to determine what they might reveal about the structural conditions of social media. A difference of prime importance between the two case studies is that factory work is wage labor coerced by economic necessity, whereas use of social networking sites is apparently voluntary and done freely. The author concludes by arguing that social media users are subject to levels of exploitation relatively consistent with industrial capitalism, whereas the structural conditions of the digital economy link profitability to a reduction in the intensity of alienation. Finally, he infers that social media is not economically beneficial to most users.
AndersonC. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York, NY: Hyperion.
3.
AndrejevicM. (2002). The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(2), 230-248.
4.
BaudrillardJ. (1998). The consumer society: Myths and structures (1st ed.). London, England: SAGE. (Original work published 1970)
5.
BourdieuP. (2008). The forms of capital. In BiggartN. W.(Ed.), Readings in economic sociology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9780470755679.ch1510.1002/9780470755679.ch15
6.
CotéM.PybusJ. (2007). Learning to immaterial labour 2.0: MySpace and social networks. Ephemera Theory and Politics in Organizations, 7(1), 880-106.
7.
DeleuzeG. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3-7.
8.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)
9.
Dyer-WithefordN. (1999). Cyber-Marx: Cycles and circuits of struggle in high technology capitalism. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
10.
FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1975)
11.
FuchsC. (2008). [Review of the book Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything, by TapscottDonWilliamsAnthony D.]. International Journal of Communication, 2. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/250/125
12.
FuchsC. (2010). Labor in informational capitalism and on the Internet. Information Society: An International Journal, 26(3), 179-196.
13.
GibsonW., 1984. Neuromancer. New York, NY: Ace.
14.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360.
15.
HamptonK.WellmanB. (2003). Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital. City and Community, 2(4), 277-311.
16.
HardtM.NegriA. (2001). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
HegelG. W. F. (1979). Phenomenology of spirit. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1809)
18.
HorkheimerM.AdornoT. W. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Blackwell Verso. (Original work published 1947)
19.
JurgensonN.ReyP. J. (2010, April). Marcuse, the web, and the new means of ambient production. Paper presented at the VII Annual Social Theory Forum on Critical Social Theory: Freud & Lacan for 21st Century, Boston, MA.
20.
KohnM. L. (1976). Occupational structure and alienation. American Journal of Sociology, 82(1), 111-130.
21.
KrokerA. (2004). The will to technology and the culture of nihilism: Heidegger, Marx, Nietzsche. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
22.
LazzaratoM. (1996). Immaterial labor. In VirnoP.HardtM. (Eds.), Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics (pp. 133-149). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
LeMoyneT. L.FalkW. W.NeustadtlA. (1994). Hyperrationality: Historical antecedents and contemporary outcomes within Japanese manufacturing. Sociological Spectrum, 14(3), 221-240.
24.
LisbergerS. (Director). 1982. TRON [Motion picture]. United States: Disney.
25.
MarcuseH. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
RitzerG.GoodmanD. J. (2003). Classical sociological theory (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
35.
RitzerG.JurgensonN. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital “prosumer.”Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13-36.
36.
RitzerG.LeMoyneT.1991. Hyperrationality: an extension of Weberian and neo-Weberian theory. RitzerG., Metatheorising in Sociology, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, pp. 93-115.
37.
SassenS. (2002). Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology, 50(3), 365-388.
38.
ShahD. V.KwakN.HolbertR. L. (2001). “ Connecting” and” disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18(2), 141-162.
39.
ShawW. H.1979. “The Handmill Gives You the Feudal Lord”: Marx’s technological determinism. History and Theory, 18(2), 155-176.
40.
SmytheD. W. (2001). On the audience commodity and its work. In DurhamM. G.KellnerD. M., Media and cultural studies: Keyworks (pp. 253-279). Malden, MA: Blackwell. (Original work published 1981)
41.
TapscottD. (1996). The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
42.
TerranovaT. (2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 63, 18(2), 33-58.
43.
TofflerA. (1984). The third wave. New York, NY: Bantam.
44.
TrontiM. (1966). Operai e capitale [Workers and capital]. Turin, Italy: Einaudi.
45.
VeblenT. (1899). The theory of the leisure class (Reissue). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
WallimannI. (1981). Estrangement: Marx’s conception of human nature and the division of labor. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
48.
WellmanB.HaaseB. Q.WitteJ.HamptonK. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436-455.
49.
WendlingA. (2009). Karl Marx on technology and alienation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
ZwickD.BonsuS. K.DarmodyA.2008. Putting consumers to work: “Co-creation” and new marketing govern-mentality. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 163-196.
