Researchers committed to furthering social justice face many challenges in aligning their values with their research approaches. The transformative paradigm provides a philosophical framework that focuses on ethics in terms of cultural responsiveness, recognizing those dimensions of diversity that are associated with power differences, building trusting relationships, and developing mixed methods that are conducive to social change. Examples of transformative cyclical mixed methods designs are used to illustrate the methodological implications of this paradigm.
Abu-SaadI. (2008). Spatial transformation and indigenous resistance: The urbanization of the Palestinian Bedouin in southern Israel. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 1713–1754.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. Washington DC: Author.
3.
ChristiansC. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 139-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
CollinsC. C.DresslerW. W. (2008). Cultural consensus and cultural diversity: A mixed methods investigation of human service providers’ models of domestic violence. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 362–387.
5.
CramF. (2009). Maintaining indigenous voices. In MertensD. M.GinsbergP. E. (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 308–322). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
DowneyD. J. (2009). Institutional activism and community building: Human relations responses to 9/11 in Orange County, California. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 99–113.
7.
EdnoT.JohT.YuH. C. (2003). Voices from the field: Health and evaluation leaders on multicultural evaluation. Oakland, CA: Social Policy Research Associates.
8.
GreeneJ. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology?Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 7–22.
9.
GubaE.LincolnY. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp.191–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
GuzmanB.2003. Examining the role of cultural competency in program evaluation: Visions for new millennium evaluators. In DonaldsonS.ScrivenM. (Eds.), Evaluating Social Programs and Problems: Visions for the New Millennium (pp. 167–182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
HarrisR.HolmesH.MertensD. M. (2009). Research ethics in sign language communities. Sign Language Studies, 9(2), 104–131.
12.
HodgkinS. (2008). Telling it all: A story of women’s social capital using a mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 296–316.
13.
HuatoJ.ZenoK. W. (2009). Class, race, and the spousal income gap: The effects of family income, educational attainment, and race-ethnicity on the husband-wife income ratio in the United States, 1980, 1990, 2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 261–275.
14.
KepaM.Manu’atuL. (2008). Pedagogical decolonization: Impacts of the European/Pākehā society on the education of Tongan People in Aotearoa, New Zealand. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 1801–1816.
15.
LaFranceJ.Crazy Bull. (2009). Researching ourselves back to life: Taking control of the research agenda in Indian country. In MertensD. M.GinsburgP.E. (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 135–149). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
MertensD. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 212–225.
17.
MertensD. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
MertensD. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
MertensD. M.BledsoeK.SullivanM.WilsonA. (2010). Utilization of mixed methods for transformative purposes. In TeddlieC.TashakorriA. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
MertensD. M.WilsonA. T. (in press). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. New York, NY: Guilford.
21.
MomotiukD.FolinoF. (2009, October15). Canadian Association of the Deaf Requests Official International Congress on Education of the Deaf Apology. Letter to Clair Anderson. Retrieved from http://www.cad.ca/en/news/details.asp?newsID=65
SchildkrautD. J. (2009). The dynamics of public opinion on ethnic profiling after 9/11: Results from a survey experiment. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 61–79.
24.
SenGuptaS.HopsonR.Thompson-RobinsonM. (Eds.). (2004). In search of cultural competence in evaluation toward principles and practices: New directions for evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
SilkaL. (2009). Partnership ethics. In MertensD. M.GinsbergP. E. (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 337–352). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
SmithK. E. I. (2008). Comparing state and international protections of indigenous peoples’ human rights. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 1817–1835.
27.
SymonetteH. (2004). Walking pathways toward becoming a culturally competent evaluator: Boundaries, borderlands, and border crossings. In Thompson-RobinsonM.HopsonR.SenGuptaS. (Eds.), In search of cultural competence in evaluation toward principles and practices: New directions for evaluation (pp. 95–110). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
WrightH. K. (2003). An endarkened feminist epistemology?: Identity, difference, and the politics of representation in educational research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 197-214.
