Sociology is a discipline in which the idea of a multi-method research design has held credence for many years, far before the term mixed methods research was coined. This article charts the implementation and framing of this approach over time to better understand the place and state of mixed methods research in the discipline today. Several recent applications of mixed method research by sociologists are highlighted to demonstrate the range of projects being conducted. There are challenges to further development of mixed methods inquiry within Sociology; however, the current epistemological base of the approach—pragmatism—promotes the merits of a variety of theoretical and methodological approaches and the discipline is better for it.
adamsj.TrinitapoliJ. (2009). The Malawi religion project: Data collection and selected analyses. Demographic Research,21(10), 255-288.
2.
AndrewsK. T. (2001). Social movements and policy implementation: The Mississippi Civil Rights Movement and the war on poverty, 1965-1971. American Sociological Review, 66, 71-95.
3.
AxinnW. G.FrickeT. E.ThorntonA. (1991). The microdemographic community-study approach. Sociological Methods and Research, 20, 187-218.
4.
AxinnW. G.PearceL. D. (2006). Mixed method data collection strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BeckerH. S.GeerB.HughesE. C.StraussA. L. (1961). Boys in white. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
6.
BlumerM. (1984). The Chicago School of sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BourdieuP. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
9.
BrymanA. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A Question of method or epistemology?British Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 75-92.
10.
BrymanA. (2004). Quantity and quality in social research (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
11.
BurtonL. MJarrettR.LeinL.MathewsS.QuaneJ.SkinnerD. (April, 2001). Structured discovery: Ethnography, welfare reform, and the assessment of neighborhoods, families and children. Paper presented at the Society for Research and Development of Children, St. Louis, MS.
12.
CaplowT.BahrH. M.ChadwickB. A. (1983). All faithful people: Change and continuity in Middletown’s religion. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
CheathamA.ShenE. (2003). Community-based participatory research with Cambodian girls in Long Beach, California. In MinklerM.WallersteinN. (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 316-331). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
CherlinA. J.BurtonL. M.HurtT. R.PurvinD. M. (2004). The influence of physical and sexual abuse on marriage and cohabitation. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 768-789.
15.
CherlinA. J.Cross-BarnetC.BurtonL. M.Garrett-PetersR. (2008). Promises they can keep: Low-Income women’s attitudes toward motherhood, marriage, and divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(4), 919-933.
16.
CreswellJ. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In CizekG. J. (Ed.), Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455-472). New York: Academic Press.
17.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE.
18.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
DenscombeM. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 270-283.
20.
DenzinN. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21.
DuBoisW. E. B. (1995). W. E. B. DuBois on sociology and the black community (GreenD. S.DriverE. D., Eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
FrazierE. F. (1932). The Negro family in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
FriesC. J. (2009). Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology as a theoretical basis for mixed methods research: An application to complementary and alternative medicine. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(4), 326-348.
24.
HansonB. (2008). Wither qualitative/quantitative?: Grounds for methodological convergence. Quality and Quantity, 42, 97-111.
25.
JohnsonB.GrayR. (2010). A history of philosophical and theoretical issues for mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. B. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 69-94). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
26.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J.TurnerL. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.
27.
KleinmanS. (2007). Feminist fieldwork analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
28.
KleinmanS.CoppM. A. (1993). Emotions and fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
29.
LaubachM. (2005). Consent, informal organization and job rewards: A mixed methods analysis. Social Forces, 83(4), 1535-1566.
30.
LeahyE. (2007a). Not by productivity alone: How visibility and specialization contribute to academic earnings. American Sociological Review, 72(4), 533-561.
31.
LeaheyE. (2007b). Convergenceand confidentiality? Limits to the implementation of mixed methodology. Social Science Research, 36(1), 149-158.
32.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
33.
LiebersonS. (1985). Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
LiebersonS. (1992). Einstein, Renoir, and Greeley: Some thoughts about evidence in sociology. American Sociological Review, 57, 1-15.
35.
LipsetS. M.TrowM.ColemanJ. S. (1956). Union democracy: The internal politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: New York Free Press.
36.
LyndR. S.LyndH. M. (1929). Middletown: A study in modern American culture. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
37.
LyndR. S.LyndH. M. (1937). Middletown in transition: A study in cultural conflicts. New York: Harcourt Brace.
38.
McQuistonC.FlaskerudJ. (2003). If they don’t ask about condoms, I just tell them: A descriptive case study of Latino lay health advisors’ helping activities. Health Education and Behavior, 30, 79-96.
39.
McQuistonC.Choi-HevelS.ClawsonM. (2001). Protegiendo nuestra comunidad: Participatory education for HIV prevention. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 12, 271-279.
40.
MasseyD. S. (1987). The ethnosurvey in theory and practice. International Migration Review, 21, 1498-1522.
41.
MedawarP. B. (1969). Induction and intuition in scientific thought. Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, 75.
42.
MichelsR. (1915). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. (PaulE.PaulC., Trans.). New York: The Free Press.
43.
MorganD. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.
44.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2005). Taking the “Q” out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality & Quantity, 29, 267-296.
45.
ParradoE. A.McQuistonC.FlippenC. A. (2005). Participatory survey research: Integrating community collaboration and quantitative methods for the study of gender and HIV risks among Hispanic migrants. Sociological Methods and Research, 34(2), 204-239.
46.
PearceL. D. (2002). Integrating survey and ethnographic methods for systematic anomalous case analysis. Sociological Methodology, 32(1), 103-132.
47.
PearceL. D.DentonM. L. (2011). A faith of their own: Stability and change in the religiosity of American adolescents. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
PerryG. K. (2009). Exploring occupational stereotyping in the new economy: The intersectional tradition meets mixed methods research. In BergerM. T.GuidrozK. (Eds.), The Intersectional Approach: Transforming the Academy through Race, Class, and Gender (pp. 229-245). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
49.
PlattJ. (1996). A history of sociological research methods in America: 1920-1960. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
SieberS. D. (1973). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1335-1359.
51.
SmallM. L. (2008). Lost in translation: How not to make qualitative research more scientific. In LamontM.WhiteP. (eds.), National Science Foundation’s workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research (pp. 165-171). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
52.
SmallM. L. (2009). “How many cases do I need?” On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography,10(1), 5-38.
53.
SmithC., with DentonM. L. (2005). Soul searching. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
SmithC., with SnellP. (2009). Souls in transition. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
SmithJ. (1991). A methodology for twenty-first century sociology. Social Forces, 70(1), 1-17.
56.
SmithS. S.MooreM. R. (2000). Intraracial diversity and relations among African-Americans: closeness among black students at a predominantly white university. American Journal of Sociology, 106(1), 1-39.
ThomasW. I. (1923). The unadjusted girl: With cases and standpoint for behavior analysis. Little, Brown: Boston, MA.
59.
ThomasW. I.ZnanieckiF. (1918). The Polish Peasant in Europe and America: Monograph of an immigrant group. Boston, MA: Richard G. Badger.
60.
TrinitapoliJ. (2007). Religious exclusivism among US adolescents. The Sociological Quarterly, 48, 451-483.
61.
WacquantL. (1998). The double-edged sword of reason: The scholar’s predicament and the sociologist’s mission. European Journal of Social Theory, 2-3(Spring), 275-281.
62.
WeberM. (1921/1968). Economy and Society. (RothG.WittichC., Eds. & Trans.) New York: Bedminster Press.
63.
WinstonP.AngelR.Chase-LansdaleP. L.CherlinA. J.MoffittR. A.WilsonW. J. (1999). Welfare, children, and families: Overview and design. Welfare, children, and families: A three-city study. Retrieved from http://www.jhu.edu/~welfare
64.
YoshikawaH.WeisnerT. S.KalilA.WayN. (2008). Mixing qualitative and quantitative research in developmental science: Uses and methodological choices. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 344-354.
