Donald Trump is known for the merchandise he peddles; whether it be his name on towers or casinos, the Trump brand is a huge money-maker. Politicians are expected to have available merchandise during campaign season so that the electorate can show their support. Trump, however, has taken campaign merchandise to a whole new level. By comparing Trump campaign merchandise to his Democratic opponent Harris’ campaign merchandise unintentional messages become apparent. Through a metaphor analysis, I consider the available merchandise from the 2024 campaign to ascertain inherent messages for the electorate. After a literature review of campaign branding, a discussion of metaphor, and an analysis of both campaigns’ merchandise, I draw conclusions about what merchandise says about the candidates, campaigns, and electorate.
HockettJ. (2017). Brand “W” and the marketing of an American President: Or, logos as logos. Westminster Papers in Communication & Culture, 2(2), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.25
16.
HoranJ.BrubakerJ.KingA.MeinholdS. (2024). Tweet like Trump: Political branding and Twitter usage among congressional candidates in 2020 and 2022. Social Science Quarterly, 105(5), 1806–1820.
17.
KövecsesZ. (2016). Conceptual metaphor theory. In SeminoE.DemjénZ. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 31–45). Routledge.
18.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
19.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208.
OrtizJ. A. F.GuevarezR. R.CorradaM. S.OrtizM. (2023). Politics as a spectacle: The role of advertising and physical image in visualizing a political candidate as merchandise and their impact on voting intentions. Journal of Creative Communications, 18(3), 328–348.
PichC. (2022). Political branding: A research agenda for political marketing (pp. 121–142). Edward Elgar Publishing.
31.
PichC.ArmannsdottirG. (2018). Political brand image: An investigation into the operationalisation of the external orientation of David Cameron’s Conservative brand. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(1), 35–52.
32.
PichC.DeanD. (2015). Political branding: sense of identity or identity crisis? An investigation of the transfer potential of the brand identity prism to the UK Conservative Party. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(11–12), 1353–1378.
33.
PichC.NewmanB. I. (2020a). Evolution of political branding: Typologies, diverse settings and future research. Journal of Political Marketing, 19(1–2), 3–14.
34.
PichC.NewmanB. I. (Eds.). (2020b). Political branding: More than parties, leaders and policies. Routledge.
35.
PichC.ReardonJ.ArmannsdottirA. (2024). A huge political experiment’–exploring the political brand positioning of political parties in Jersey from an internal-external perspective. Journal of Marketing Communications, 1–25.
StuckeyM. E. (2020). “The power of the presidency to hurt”: The indecorous rhetoric of Donald J. Trump and the rhetorical norms of democracy. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 366–391.
40.
SzwedekA. (2000). The ontology of metaphors: The sense of touch in language formation. Scripta Periodica, 4, 193–199.
TurcotteJ. (Ed.). (2024). Merch, fandom, and sports metaphors: The commodification of the modern campaign. In Comedy, cameos, and campaign communication (1st ed., pp. 13–29). Routledge.
43.
UscinskiJ. E.GorenL. J. (2011). What’s in a name? Coverage of senator Hillary Clinton during the 2008 democratic primary. Political Research Quarterly, 64(4), 884–896.
