This essay develops an integrated account of aesthetic experience by bringing neuroscience into dialogue with psychoanalysis. It critiques disembodied, oculocentric models of visual perception, proposing instead that aesthetic engagement is mediated by embodied simulation—a neurofunctional mechanism enabling viewers to reenact observed gestures, affects, and movements. This simulation activates a prereflective, affective unconscious rooted in bodily memory and relational experience. Drawing on Winnicott’s concept of transitional phenomena and Kris’s notion of regression in the service of the ego, the author frames the aesthetic image as a transitional object that facilitates affective modulation and subjective reorganization. Aesthetic experience emerges not as symbolic interpretation but as a temporally structured act of play, attunement, and transformation. By articulating the convergences between neuroscience and psychoanalysis, the essay offers a novel model for understanding how images engage our bodies, shape our unconscious, and participate in the ongoing formation of subjectivity.
ArdizziM.FerroniF.UmiltàM. A.PinardiC.ErranteE.FerriF.FaddaE.GalleseV. (2021). Visceromotor roots of aesthetic evaluation of pain in art: An fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(11), 1113–1122. doi:10.1093/scan/nsab066
BastiaansenJ.A.C.J.ThiouxM.KeysersC. (2009). Evidence for mirror systems in emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1528), 2391–2404. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0058
4.
BeltingH. (2011). An anthropology of images: Picture, medium, body (DunlapT., Trans.). Princeton University Press.
5.
BenjaminJ. (1990). An outline of intersubjectivity: The development of recognition. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7(Suppl.), 33–46.
6.
BöhmeG. (2018). The aesthetics of atmospheres (ambiances, atmospheres and sensory experiences of spaces) (ThibaudJ.-P., Ed.). Routledge.
7.
BoniniL.RotunnoC.ArcuriE.GalleseV. (2022). Mirror neurons 30 years later: implications and applications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(9), 767–78. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.003.
8.
BredekampH. (2017). Image acts. De Gruyter.
9.
BucciW. (1997). Psychoanalysis and cognitive science: A multiple code theory. Guilford.
DamasioA. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt.
12.
DeweyJ. (1934). Art as experience. Capricorn.
13.
FreedbergD.GalleseV. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 197–203. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003
14.
FreudS. (1957). The unconscious. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 14 (1914–1916): On the history of the psycho-analytic movement, papers on meta-psychology and other works (pp. 159–215). Hogarth. (Original work published 1915)
15.
FreudS. (1958). Remembering, repeating and working-through (further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis II). In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 12 (1911–1913): The case of Schreber, papers on technique and other works (pp. 145–156). Hogarth. (Original work published 1914)
16.
FreudS. (1960). Project for a scientific psychology. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 1 (1886–1899): Pre-psycho-analytic publications and unpublished drafts (pp. 281–391). Hogarth. (Original work published 1895)
17.
GalleseV. (2009). Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19(5), 519–536. doi:10.1080/10481880903231910
18.
GalleseV. (2014). Bodily selves in relation: Embodied simulation as second-person perspective on intersubjectivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1644), 20130177.
19.
GalleseV. (2017). Visions of the body. Embodied simulation and aesthetic experience. Aisthesis, 1(1), 41–50.
20.
GalleseV. (2018). Naturalizing aesthetic experience. The role of (liberated) embodied simulation. Projections, 12(2), 50–59.
21.
GalleseV. (2019). Embodied simulation. Its bearing on aesthetic experience and the dialogue between neuroscience and the humanities. Gestalt Theory, 41(2), 113–128.
22.
GalleseV. (2024). Digital visions: The experience of self and others in the age of the digital revolution. International Review of Psychiatry, 36(6), 656–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2024.2355281.
23.
GalleseV.EagleM. E.MigoneP. (2007). Intentional attunement: Mirror neurons and the neural underpinnings of interpersonal relations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 131–176.
24.
GalleseV.FreedbergD. (2007). Mirror and canonical neurons are crucial elements in esthetic response. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10), 411. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.001
25.
GalleseV.GuerraM. (2019). The empathic screen: Cinema and neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
26.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
27.
GrifferoT. (2016). Atmospheres: Aesthetics of emotional spaces. Routledge.
28.
GumbrechtH. U. (2004). The production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford University Press.
29.
KandelE. R. (2016). Reductionism in art and brain science: Bridging the two cultures. Columbia University Press.
30.
KawabataH.ZekiS. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(4), 1699–1705. doi:10.1152/jn.00696.2003
31.
KeysersC.WickerB.GazzolaV.AntonJ.-L.FogassiL.GalleseV. (2004). A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron, 42(2), 335–346. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00156-4
32.
KrisE. (1938). The aesthetic enjoyment and the reality principle. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 7(1), 25–56.
33.
KrisE. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. International Universities Press.
34.
KristevaJ. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection (RoudiezL. S., Trans.). Columbia University Press.
35.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.
36.
LaplancheJ. (1999). Essays on otherness (FletcherJ., Trans.). Routledge.
37.
LeDouxJ. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. Simon & Schuster.
38.
LeDouxJ.PineD. S. (2016). Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030353
39.
LingiardiV. (2025). Mindscapes: The psyche in the landscape. Taylor & Francis.
40.
LoewaldH. W. (1960). On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41, 16–33.
41.
LorenzK. (1937). Über die Bildung des Instinktbegriffes [On the formation of the concept of instinct]. Die Naturwissenschaften, 25(19), 289–300. doi:10.1007/BF01492648
42.
LorenzK. (1964). The nature of instinct. In HessE. H. (Ed.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 129–175). International Universities Press.
43.
Lyons-RuthK. (1998). Implicit relational knowing: Its role in development and psychoanalytic treatment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19(3), 282–289.
44.
ManningE. (2012). Relationscapes: Movement, art, philosophy. MIT Press.
45.
MarksL. U. (2002). Touch: Sensuous theory and multisensory media. University of Minnesota Press.
46.
Merleau-PontyM. (1964). Eye and mind. In EdieJ. M. (Ed.), The primacy of perception (pp. 159–190). Northwestern University Press.
47.
MorelliU. (2011). Mente e paesaggio: Una teoria della vivibilità [Mind and landscape: A theory of livability]. Bollati Boringhieri.
48.
SchacterD. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(3), 501–518. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501
49.
SternD. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. Norton.
50.
SternD. N. (2010). Forms of vitality: Exploring dynamic experience in psychology, the arts, psychotherapy, and development. Oxford University Press.
51.
WarburgA. (2010). The renewal of pagan antiquity: Contributions to the cultural history of the European Renaissance (BrittD., Trans.). Getty Research Institute.
52.
WickerB.KeysersC.PlaillyJ.RoyetJ.-P.GalleseV.RizzolattiG. (2003). Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron, 40(3), 655–664. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00679-2
53.
WinnicottD. W. (1989). Playing and reality. Routledge Classics. (Original work published 1971)
54.
WojciehowskiH.GalleseV. (2011). How Stories Make Us Feel: Toward an Embodied Narratology. California Italian Studies, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5070/C321008974 Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3jg726c2
55.
ZekiS. (1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford University Press.
