State-level public assistance agencies completed nearly a million SNAP fraud investigations in fiscal year 2016. These investigations hinge on compiling incriminating information about clients. Drawing on interviews with welfare fraud workers in five U.S. states, this article shows how fraud investigators creatively exploit clients’ social networks to extract such information, and thus use clients’ social ties against them. Investigators gain some information through elective cooperation, when people voluntarily implicate others. Fraud workers say these denunciations typically arise from negative-valence ties (bad blood). Other times, investigators co-opt neutral or positive-valence ties (good will) for enforcement purposes. This co-optation includes eliciting information from unwitting acquaintances and exploiting clients’ own online social networking activity. These findings demonstrate social ties’ appropriability, through which they serve as resources for relational outsiders’ interests. Repurposing welfare clients’ social ties for fraud enforcement presents a two-fold threat to subsistence and social mobility prospects: it imposes punishments—including program disqualifications—while simultaneously damaging social support networks. These enforcement practices reveal appropriability as an unrecognized property of social ties, particularly for socioeconomically marginalized people, and constitute a noteworthy element of contemporary poverty governance.
AdelmanRonald D.TmanovaLyubov L.DelgadoDianaDionSarahLachs.Mark S.2014. “Caregiver Burden: A Clinical Review.” Journal of the American Medical Association311(10):1052–59.
2.
AielloMichael F.2018. “Policing through Social Networking: Testing the Linkage between Digital and Physical Police Practices.” The Police Journal91(1):89–101.
3.
ArneilBarbara.2006. Diverse Communities: The Problem with Social Capital. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BeckettKatherineHerbertSteve. 2009. Banished: The New Social Control in Urban America. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BellMonica C.2016. “Situational Trust: How Disadvantaged Mothers Reconceive Legal Cynicism.” Law & Society Review50(2):314–47.
6.
BelleDeborah E.1983. “The Impact of Poverty on Social Networks and Supports.” Marriage and Family Review5(4):89–103.
7.
BergemannPatrick.2017. “Denunciation and Social Control.” American Sociological Review82(2):384–406.
8.
BriggsXavier de Souza.1998. “Brown Kids in White Suburbs: Housing Mobility and the Many Faces of Social Capital.” Housing Policy Debate9(1):177–221.
9.
BrodkinEvelyn Z.1993. “The Making of an Enemy: How Welfare Policies Construct the Poor.” Law & Social Inquiry18(4):647–70.
10.
BrodkinEvelyn Z.1997. “Inside the Welfare Contract: Discretion and Accountability in State Welfare Administration.” Social Service Review71(1):1–33.
11.
ChunnDorothy E.GaviganShelley A. M. 2006. “From Welfare Fraud to Welfare as Fraud: The Criminalization of Poverty.” Pp. 217–35 in Criminalizing Women, edited by BalfourG.Comack.E.Black Point, Canada: Fernwood Publishing.
12.
CohenAlbert K.1955. Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
13.
CohlerBertram J.LiebermanMorton A. 1980. “Social Relations and Mental Health: Middle-Aged and Older Men and Women from Three European Ethnic Groups.” Research on Aging2(4):445–69.
14.
DesmondMatthew.2012. “Disposable Ties and the Urban Poor.” American Journal of Sociology117(5):1295–335.
15.
DesmondMatthew.2016. Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City. New York: Crown Publishers.
16.
DesmondMatthewTravisAdam. 2018. “Political Consequences of Survival Strategies among the Urban Poor.” American Sociological Review83(5):869–96.
17.
DiMaggioPaulGarip.Filiz2012. “Network Effects and Social Inequality.” Annual Review of Sociology38:93–118.
18.
DiPreteThomas A.Eirich.Gregory M.2006. “Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments.” Annual Review of Sociology32:271–97.
19.
DomínguezSilviaWatkins.Celeste2003. “Creating Networks for Survival and Mobility: Social Capital among African-American and Latin-American Low-Income Mothers.” Social Problems50(1):111–35.
20.
DuneierMitchell.1999. Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
21.
EdinKathrynLein.Laura1997. Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
EdinKathryn J.ShaeferH. Luke. 2015. $2.00 a Day: Living on Almost Nothing in America. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
23.
EppCharles R.Maynard-MoodyStevenHaider-Markel.Donald2014. Pulled Over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
EubanksVirginia.2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
25.
Food and Nutrition Service. 2017a. “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation and Costs.” Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
26.
Food and Nutrition Service. 2017b. “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program State Activity Report, Fiscal Year 2016.” Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
27.
GarandJames C.XuPingDavis.Belinda C.2017. “Immigration Attitudes and Support for the Welfare State in the American Mass Public.” American Journal of Political Science61(1):146–62.
28.
GarlandDavid.1985. Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
29.
GarlandDavid.1996. “The Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society.” British Journal of Criminology36(4):445–71.
30.
GarlandDavid.2017. “Punishment and Welfare: Social Problems and Social Structures.” Pp. 77–97 in The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, edited by LieblingA.MarunaS.McAra.L.New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
GilliomJohn.2001. Overseers of the Poor: Surveillance, Resistance, and the Limits of Privacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
GilmanMichele E.2008. “Welfare, Privacy, and Feminism.” University of Baltimore Law Forum39(1):1–25.
33.
GloverPenelope R.2001. “Re-defining Friendship: Employment of Informants by Police.” University of Colorado Law Review72:749–78.
34.
GoddardTim.2012. “Post-Welfarist Risk Managers? Risk, Crime Prevention and the Responsibilization of Community-Based Organizations.” Theoretical Criminology16(3):347–63.
35.
GoffmanAlice.2014. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
GoffmanErving.1969. Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
37.
GoffmanErving.1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
GowanTeresa.2010. “What’s Social Capital Got to Do with It? The Ambiguous (and Overstated) Relationship between Social Capital and Ghetto Underemployment.” Critical Sociology37(1):47–66.
39.
GranovetterMark.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology78(6):1360–80.
40.
GranovetterMark.1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
GrayDavid.2017. The Fourth Amendment in an Age of Surveillance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
GreenBenHorelThibautPapachristos.Andrew V.2017. “Modeling Contagion through Social Networks to Explain and Predict Gunshot Violence in Chicago, 2006 to 2014.” JAMA Internal Medicine177(3):326–33.
43.
GustafsonKaaryn S.2009. “The Criminalization of Poverty.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology99(3):643–716.
44.
GustafsonKaaryn S.2011. Cheating Welfare: Public Assistance and the Criminalization of Poverty. New York: New York University Press.
45.
HaganJohnMacMillanRossWheaton.Blair1996. “New Kid in Town: Social Capital and the Life Course Effects of Family Migration on Children.” American Sociological Review61(3):368–85.
46.
HalushkaJohn.2017. “Managing Rehabilitation: Negotiating Performance Accountability at the Frontlines of Reentry Service Provision.” Punishment & Society19(4):482–502.
47.
HancockAnge-Marie.2004. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York: New York University Press.
48.
Hannah-MoffatKelly.2005. “Criminogenic Needs and the Transformative Risk Subject: Hybridizations of Risk/Need in Penality.” Punishment & Society7(1):29–51.
49.
HeadworthSpencerOssei-OwusuShaun. 2017. “The Accused Poor.” Social Justice44(2/3):55–82.
50.
HorderJeremy.2015. “Excusing Information-Provision Crimes in the Bureaucratic State.” Current Legal Problems68(1):197–227.
51.
HughesCayce C.2018. “From the Long Arm of the State to Eyes on the Street: How Poor African American Mothers Navigate Surveillance in the Social Safety Net.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. Online first (https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241618784151).
52.
IoannidesYannis M.Loury.Linda Datcher2004. “Job Information Networks, Neighborhood Effects, and Inequality.” Journal of Economic Literature42(4):1056–93.
53.
JerolmackColinKhanShamus. 2014. “Talk Is Cheap: Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy.” Sociological Methods & Research43(2):178–209.
54.
JohElizabeth E.2017. “The Undue Influence of Surveillance Technology Companies on Policing.” New York University Law Review92:101–130.
55.
KatzMichael B. [1989] 2013. The Undeserving Poor: America’s Enduring Confrontation with Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
KlinenbergEric.2002. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago.
57.
Kohler-HausmannJulilly.2007. “‘The Crime of Survival’: Fraud Prosecutions, Community Surveillance and the Original ‘Welfare Queen.’” Journal of Social History41(2):329–54.
58.
KrackhardtDavid.1992. “The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations.” Pp. 216–39 in Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, edited by NohriaN.EcclesR. G. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
59.
LagesonSarahMaruna.Shadd2018. “Digital Degradation: Stigma Management in the Internet Age.” Punishment & Society20(1):113–33.
60.
LagesonSarahVuoloMikeUggen.Christopher2015. “Legal Ambiguity in Managerial Assessments of Criminal Records.” Law & Social Inquiry40(1):175–204.
61.
Lara-MillánArmando.2014. “Public Emergency Room Overcrowding in the Era of Mass Imprisonment.” American Sociological Review79(5):866–87.
62.
Lara-MillánArmandoVan Cleve.Nicole Gonzalez2017. “Interorganizational Utility of Welfare Stigma in the Criminal Justice System.” Criminology55(1):59–84.
63.
LeopoldThomasRaabMarcelEngelhardt.Henriette2014. “The Transition to Parent Care: Costs, Commitments, and Caregiver Selection among Children.” Journal of Marriage and Family76(2):300–318.
64.
LevineJudith A.2013. Ain’t No Trust: How Bosses, Boyfriends, and Bureaucrats Fail Low-Income Mothers and Why It Matters. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
65.
LinNan.1999. “Social Networks and Status Attainment.” Annual Review of Sociology25:467–87.
66.
LipskyMichael. [1980] 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
67.
MaddenMaryGilmanMicheleLevyKarenMarwick.Alice2017. “Privacy, Poverty, and Big Data: A Matrix of Vulnerability for Poor Americans.” Washington University Law Review95:53–125.
68.
MarxGary T.2016. Windows into the Soul: Surveillance and Society in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
MatsuedaRoss L.1982. “Testing Control Theory and Differential Association: A Causal Modeling Approach.” American Sociological Review47(4):489–504.
70.
Maynard-MoodyStevenMusheno.Michael2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
71.
MazelisJoan Maya.2017. Surviving Poverty: Creating Sustainable Ties among the Poor. New York: New York University Press.
72.
McElhattanDavid.2018. “‘$40 to Make Sure’: Background Check Laws and the Endogenous Construction of Criminal Risk.” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society77:99–121.
73.
McKimAllison.2017. Addicted to Rehab: Race, Gender, and Drugs in the Era of Mass Incarceration. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
74.
MenjívarCecilia.2000. Fragmented Ties: Salvadoran Immigrant Networks in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
75.
MertonRobert K.1948. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” The Antioch Review8(2):193–210.
76.
MillerReuben Jonathan.2014. “Devolving the Carceral State: Race, Prisoner Reentry, and the Micro-Politics of Urban Poverty Management.” Punishment & Society16(3):305–335.
77.
MillerReuben JonathanAlexander.Amanda2016. “The Price of Carceral Citizenship: Punishment, Surveillance, and Social Welfare Policy in an Age of Carceral Expansion.” Michigan Journal of Race and Law21(2):291–314.
78.
MillsC. Wright. [1956] 2000. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
79.
Miron-ShatzTalyaStoneArthurKahneman.Daniel2009. “Memories of Yesterday’s Emotions: Does the Valence of Experience Affect the Memory-Experience Gap?” Emotion9(6):885–91.
80.
MorganKimberly J.Orloff.Ann Shola2017. “Introduction: The Many Hands of the State.” Pp. 1–32 in The Many Hands of the State: Theorizing Political Authority and Social Control, edited by MorganK. J.Orloff.A. SholaNew York: Cambridge University Press.
81.
NatapoffAlexandra.2009. Snitching: Criminal Informants and the Erosion of American Justice. New York: New York University Press.
82.
NewmanKatherine S.1999. No Shame in My Game: The Working Poor in the Inner City. New York: Vintage Books and Russell Sage Foundation.
83.
OcenPriscilla A.2012. “The New Racially Restrictive Covenant: Race, Welfare, and the Policing of Black Women in Subsidized Housing.” UCLA Law Review59:1540–82.
84.
PantellMatthewRehkopfDavidJutteDouglasSymeS. LeonardBalmesJohnAdler.Mamcy2013. “Social Isolation: A Predictor of Mortality Comparable to Traditional Risk Factors.” American Journal of Public Health103(11):2056–62.
85.
PattonDesmond UptonBruntonDouglas-WadeDixonAndreaMillerReuben JonathanLeonardPatrickHackman.Rose2017. “Stop and Frisk Online: Theorizing Everyday Racism in Digital Policing in the Use of Social Media for Identification of Criminal Conduct and Associations.” Social Media + Society3(3):1–10.
86.
PivenFrances FoxCloward.Richard A. [1971] 1993. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage Books.
87.
PoundRoscoe.1910. “Law in Books and Law in Action.” American Law Review44:12–36.
88.
ProttasJeffrey Manditch.1979. People Processing: The Street-Level Bureaucrat in Public Service Bureaucracies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
89.
PutnamRobert D.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
90.
QuadagnoJill S.1994. The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
91.
RaschickMichaelIngersoll-DaytonBerit. 2004. “The Costs and Rewards of Caregiving among Aging Spouses and Adult Children.” Family Relations53(3):317–25.
92.
RaudenbushDanielle.2016. “‘I Stay by Myself’: Social Support, Distrust, and Selective Solidarity among the Urban Poor.” Sociological Forum31(4):1018–39.
93.
ReevesJoshua.2017. Citizen Spies: The Long Rise of America’s Surveillance Society. New York: New York University Press.
94.
RiveraLauren A.2015. Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
95.
RobertsDorothy E. [1997] 1999. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Vintage Books.
96.
RobertsDorothy E.2002. Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare. New York: Basic Books.
97.
RobertsDorothy E.2012. “Prison, Foster Care, and the Systematic Punishment of Black Mothers.” UCLA Law Review59:1474–1500.
98.
RosenEva.2014. “Rigging the Rules of the Game: How Landlords Geographically Sort Low-Income Renters.” City & Community13(4):310–40.
99.
RosenblattPeterDeLuca.Stefanie2012. “‘We Don’t Live Outside, We Live in Here’: Neighborhood and Residential Mobility Decisions among Low-Income Families.” City & Community11(3):254–84.
100.
SandelowskiMargarete.2008. “Theoretical Saturation.” Pp. 875–76 in The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Methods, edited by GivenL. M. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
101.
SaratAustin.1990. “‘. . . The Law Is All Over’: Power, Resistance, and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor.” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities2(2):343–79.
102.
SartreJean-Paul. [1943] 1993. Being and Nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.
103.
SchneiderAnneIngram.Helen1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review87(2):334–47.
104.
SchramSanford F.SossJoeFordingRichard C.HouserLinda. 2009. “Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Reform.” American Sociological Review74(3):398–422.
105.
ScottJames C.1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
106.
ScoularJaneO’NeillMaggie. 2007. “Regulating Prostitution: Social Inclusion, Responsibilization, and the Politics of Prostitution Reform.” British Journal of Criminology47(5):764–78.
107.
SimmelGeorg. [1903] 2002. “The Metropolis and Mental Life.” In The Blackwell City Reader, edited by BridgeG.Watson.S.Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
108.
SimonJonathan.2007. Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.
109.
SkolnickJerome H.1966. Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York:Macmillan.
110.
SmallMario.2009. “‘How Many Cases Do I Need?’ On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research.” Ethnography10(1):5–38.
111.
SmithKirsten P.Christakis.Nicholas A.2008. “Social Networks and Health.” Annual Review of Sociology34:405–29.
112.
SmithSandra Susan.2005. “‘Don’t Put My Name On It’: Social Capital Activation and Job-Finding Assistance among the Black Urban Poor.” American Journal of Sociology111(1):1–57.
113.
SmithSandra Susan.2007. Lone Pursuit: Distrust and Defensive Individualism among the Black Poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
114.
SossJoeFordingRichard C.SchramSanford S. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
115.
StackCarol B.1974. All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community. New York: Harper & Row.
116.
StackCarol B.BurtonLinda M. 1993. “Kinscripts.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies24(2):157–70.
117.
StuartForrest.2016. Down, Out, and Under Arrest: Policing and Everyday Life in Skid Row. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
118.
SuitorJ. JillGilliganMeganJohnsonKaitlinPillemer.Karl2013. “Caregiving, Perceptions of Maternal Favoritism, and Tension among Siblings.” The Gerontologist54(1):580–88.
ThomasKimberly.2013. “Interpersonal Power in the Criminal System.” American Criminal Law Review50(1):247–76.
121.
TrottierDaniel.2017. “‘Fear of Contact’: Police Surveillance through Social Networks.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology4(4):457–77.
122.
UggenChristopherVuoloMikeLagesonSarahRuhlandEbonyWhithamHilary K. 2014. “The Edge of Stigma: An Experimental Audit of the Effects of Low-Level Criminal Records on Employment.” Criminology52(4):627–54.
123.
van DijckJosé.2013. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press.
124.
VenkateshSudhir.2006. Off the Books: The Underground Economy of the Urban Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
125.
WacquantLoïc.1998. “Negative Social Capital: State Breakdown and Social Destitution in America’s Urban Core.” Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment13(1):25–40.
126.
WacquantLoïc.2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
127.
WaldingerRoger.1995. “The ‘Other Side’ of Embeddedness: A Case-Study of the Interplay of Economy and Ethnicity.” Ethnic and Racial Studies18(3):555–80.
128.
Watkins-HayesCeleste.2009. The New Welfare Bureaucrats: Entanglements of Race, Class, and Policy Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
129.
YinRobert K.2014. Case Study Research, 5th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
130.
CS/HB 515: Public Assistance Fraud. Laws of Florida. 2014.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
