This article examines how global contention over reproductive rights influenced national abortion polices over the past half-century. I glean four models of normative contestation in world society and its consequences for diffusion and institutionalization, arguing that a theory of polarization best accounts for developments in norms and policies on abortion. Fixed-effects regression analyses of up to 160 countries between 1970 and 2020 test the empirical implications of this argument. Several noteworthy findings emerge. First, country linkages to international nongovernmental organization (INGOs) predict abortion liberalization, but memberships in “illiberal” international organizations and alliances are associated with more restrictive abortion policies. Second, these relationships are conditioned by a shifting global context: in recent years, the association between illiberal affiliations and policy restrictions strengthened, while the liberalizing effect of INGOs weakened. And third, illiberal affiliations disrupt or “spoil” the effect of INGO linkages on policy expansions, illustrating the consequences of mutual engagement between rival transnational networks. Similar patterns characterize the effects of women’s and pro-family INGOs on abortion policies in the post–Cold War period. These findings point to growing polarization between liberal and illiberal forces in world society and suggest the incipient institutionalization of rival norms on abortion.
AsalVictorBrownMitchellFigueroaRenee Gibson. 2008. “Structure, Empowerment and the Liberalization of Cross-National Abortion Rights.” Politics and Gender4(2):265–84.
3.
AxelrodRobert. 1997. “The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization.” Journal of Conflict Resolution41(2):203–26.
4.
AyoubPhillip M.StoecklKristina. 2024. The Global Fight Against LGBTI Rights: How Transnational Conservative Networks Target Sexual and Gender Minorities. New York: NYU Press.
5.
BaldassarriDeliaBearmanPeter. 2007. “Dynamics of Political Polarization.” American Sociological Review72(5):784–811.
6.
BeckfieldJason. 2010. “The Social Structure of the World Polity.” American Journal of Sociology115(4):1018–68.
7.
BenfordRobert D.SnowDavid A.2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology26:611–39.
8.
BergerPeter L.1967. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
9.
BergerPeterBergerBrigitteKellnerHansfried. 1973. The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness. New York: Random House.
10.
BergerPeter L.LuckmannThomas. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor.
11.
BergerPeterZijderveldAnton. 2009. In Praise of Doubt: How to Have Convictions without Becoming a Fanatic. New York: HarperCollins.
12.
BerkovitchNitza. 1999. From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women’s Rights and International Organizations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
BerkovitchNitzaBradleyKaren. 1999. “The Globalization of Women’s Status: Consensus/Dissensus in the World Polity.” Sociological Perspectives42(3):481–98.
14.
BloomDavid E.CanningDavidFinkGüntherFinlayJocelyn E.2009. “Fertility, Female Labor Force Participation, and the Demographic Dividend.” Journal of Economic Growth14(2):79–101.
15.
BloomfieldAlan. 2016. “Norm Antipreneurs and Theorising Resistance to Normative Challenge.” Review of International Studies42(2):310–33.
16.
BobClifford. 2012. The Global Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
BobClifford. 2019. Rights as Weapons: Instruments of Conflict, Tools of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
BolandReedKatziveLaura. 2008. “Developments in Laws on Induced Abortion: 1998–2007.” International Family Planning Perspectives34(3):110–20.
19.
BoliJohnThomasGeorge M.1999. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
BoothAmy. 2021. “Honduras Changes Constitution to Ban Abortion.” Lancet397(10272):360.
21.
BoyleElizabeth Heger. 2002. Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict in the Global Community. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
BoyleElizabeth H.KimMinzeeLonghoferWesley. 2015. “Abortion Liberalization in World Society, 1960–2009.” American Journal of Sociology121(3):882–913.
23.
BramborThomasClarkWilliam RobertsGolderMatt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models.” Political Analysis14(1):63–82.
24.
BromleyPatriciaSchoferEvanLonghoferWesley. 2020. “Contentions over World Culture: The Rise of Legal Restrictions on Foreign Funding to NGOs.” Social Forces99(1):281–304.
25.
BussDoris E.1998. “Robes, Relics and Rights: The Vatican and the Beijing Conference on Women.” Social and Legal Studies7(3):339–63.
26.
BussDorisHermanDidi. 2003. Globalizing Family Values: The Christian Right in International Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
27.
ButlerJennifer S.2006. Born Again: The Christian Right Globalized. London, UK: Pluto.
ChappellLouise. 2006. “Contesting Women’s Rights: Charting the Emergence of a Transnational Conservative Counter-network.” Global Society20(4):491–520.
30.
CohenSusanRichardsCory. 1994. “The Cairo Consensus: Population, Development and Women.” Family Planning Perspectives26(6):272–77.
31.
ColeWade M.GeistClaudia. 2021. “Conceiving of Contraception: World Society, Cultural Resistance, and Contraceptive Use, 1970 to 2012.” Social Forces99(4):1394–431.
32.
ColeWade M.SchoferEvanMeyerJohn W.2024. “Global Liberalism, Emerging Illiberalism, and Human Rights, 1980 to 2018.” Social Science Research120:103001.
33.
ColyvasJeannette A.JonssonStefan. 2011. “Ubiquity and Legitimacy: Disentangling Diffusion and Institutionalization.” Sociological Theory29(1):27–53.
34.
ConisElena. 2014. Vaccine Nation: America’s Changing Relationship with Immunization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
CookRebecca J.DickensBernard M.BlissLaura E.1999. “International Developments in Abortion Law from 1988 to 1998.” American Journal of Public Health89(4):579–586.
CorredorElizabeth S.2019. “Unpacking ‘Gender Ideology’ and the Global Right’s Antigender Movement.” Signs44(3):613–38.
39.
CupaćJelenaEbetürkIrem. 2021. “Backlash Advocacy and NGO Polarization over Women’s Rights in the United Nations.” International Affairs97(4):1183–201.
40.
DayiAyse. 2019. “Neoliberal Health Restructuring, Neoconservatism and the Limits of Law: Erosion of Reproductive Rights in Turkey.” Health and Human Rights Journal21(2):57–68.
41.
de SilvaMonika. 2024. “Gender Wars? Diplomacy as a Depolarizing Practice in International Politics of Gender and Sexuality.” International Studies Quarterly68(3):sqae101.
42.
DeweyLaura. 2022. “The Death of Abortion Rights Signals a Threat to Democracy.” Peace and Freedom82(2):18–19.
43.
EagerPaige Whaley. 2004. Global Population Policy: From Population Control to Reproductive Rights. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
FergusonJason L.2022. “The Great Refusal: The West, the Rest, and the New Regulations on Homosexuality, 1970–2015.” American Journal of Sociology128(3):680–727.
46.
FernándezJuan J.2021. “Women’s Civil Rights and the Worldwide Liberalization of Abortion on Demand and for Socio-Economic Reasons.” The Sociological Quarterly62(1):87–120.
47.
FineJohanna B.MayallKatherineSepúlvedaLilian. 2017. “The Role of International Human Rights Norms in the Liberalization of Abortion Laws Globally.” Health and Human Rights Journal19(1):69–79.
48.
FinerLouiseFineJohanna. 2013. “Abortion Law Around the World: Progress and Pushback.” American Journal of Public Health103(4):585–89.
49.
FinlayJocelyn E.CanningDavidPoJune Y. T.2013. “Reproductive Health Laws Around the World 1960–Present.” Harvard Dataverse (http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/20466).
50.
FinnemoreMarthaSikkinkKathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization52(4):887–917.
51.
Forman-RabinoviciAlizaSommerUdi. 2018. “Reproductive Health Policy-Makers: Comparing the Influences of International and Domestic Institutions on Abortion Policy.” Public Administration96(1):185–99.
52.
FrankDavid JohnCampBayliss J.BoutcherSteven A.2010. “Worldwide Trends in the Criminal Regulation of Sex, 1945 to 2005.” American Sociological Review75(6):867–93.
53.
FrankDavid JohnMossDana M.2017. “Cross-National and Longitudinal Variations in the Criminal Regulation of Sex, 1965 to 2005.” Social Forces95(3):941–69.
54.
FukuyamaFrancis. 2022. Liberalism and Its Discontents. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
55.
GawedaBarbara. 2022. “The Gendered Discourses of Illiberal Demographic Policy in Poland and Russia.” Politics and Governance10(4):49–60.
56.
GoetzAnne Marie. 2020. “The New Competition in Multilateral Norm-Setting: Transnational Feminists and the Illiberal Backlash.” Dedalus149(1):160–79.
57.
GoodmanRyanJinksDerek. 2013. Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights through International Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58.
GordonGwendolyn J.2018. “Environmental Personhood.” Columbia Journal of Environmental Law43(1):49–91.
59.
GrayJohn. 1986. Liberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
60.
GuillénMauro F. 2018. Rude Awakening: Threats to the Global Liberal Order. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
61.
HadlerMarkusSymonsJonathan. 2018. “World Society Divided: Divergent Trends in State Responses to Sexual Minorities and Their Reflection in Public Attitudes.” Social Forces96(4):1721–56.
62.
HildebrandtAchim. 2015. “What Shapes Abortion Law? A Global Perspective.” Global Policy6(4):418–28.
63.
HironakaAnn. 2014. Greening the Globe: World Society and Environmental Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
HorvathRobert. 2016. “The Reinvention of ‘Traditional Values’: Nataliya Narochnitskaya and Russia’s Assault on Universal Human Rights.” Europe-Asia Studies68(5):868–92.
65.
HughesMelanie M.KrookMona LenaPaxtonPamela. 2015. “Transnational Women’s Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas.” International Studies Quarterly59(2):357–72.
66.
HughesMelanie M.PaxtonPamelaQuinsaatSharonReithNicholas. 2017. “Women’s International Nongovernmental Organizations, 1950–2013.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (http://doi.org/10.3886/E100514V1).
67.
HughesMelanie M.PaxtonPamelaQuinsaatSharonReithNicholas. 2018. “Does the Global North Still Dominate Women’s International Organizing? A Network Analysis.” Mobilization23(1):1–21.
68.
IkenberryG. John. 2018. “The End of Liberal International Order?” International Affairs94(1):7–23.
69.
International Federation of Abortion and Contraception. 2024. “Abortion Law of Jurisdictions around the World” (https://www.fiapac.org/en/links/8/).
JacobsSteven A.2021. “The Scientific Consensus on When a Human’s Life Begins.” Issues in Law & Medicine36(2):221–33.
72.
JeppersonRonald L.MeyerJohn W.2021. “Evolving Cultural Models in Global and National Society.” Pp. 297–321 in Institutional Theory: The Cultural Construction of Organizations, States, and Identities, edited by JeppersonR. L.MeyerJ. W.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73.
JoachimJutta M.2007. Agenda Setting, the UN, and NGOs: Gender Violence and Reproductive Rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
74.
KamensDavid H.1992. “Variant Forms: Cases of Countries with Distinct Curricula.” Pp. 74–82 in School Knowledge for the Masses: World Models and National Primary Curricular Changes in the Twentieth Century, edited by MeyerJ. W.KamensD. H.BenavotA.London, UK: Falmer.
75.
KeckMargaret E.SikkinkKathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
76.
KneuerMarianneDemmelhuberThomasPeressonRaphaelZumbrägelTobias. 2019. “Playing the Regional Card: Why and How Authoritarian Gravity Centres Exploit Regional Organizations.” Third World Quarterly40(3):451–70.
77.
KorolczukElżbietaGraffAgnieszka. 2018. “Gender as ‘Ebola from Brussels’: The Anticolonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism.” Signs43(4):797–821.
78.
KymlickaWill. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
79.
LakeDavid A.MartinLisa L.RisseThomas. 2021. “Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization.” International Organization72(S2):225–57.
80.
LaruelleMarlene. 2022. “Illiberalism: A Conceptual Introduction.” East European Politics38(2):303–27.
81.
LerchJulia C.FrankDavid JohnSchoferEvan. 2024. “The Social Foundations of Academic Freedom: Heterogeneous Institutions in World Society, 1960 to 2022.” American Sociological Review89(1):88–125.
82.
LerchJulia C.SchoferEvanFrankDavid JohnLonghoferWesleyRamirezFrancisco O.WotipkaChristine MinVelascoKristopher. 2022. “Women’s Participation and Challenges to the Liberal Script: A Global Perspective.” International Sociology37(3):305–29.
83.
LewisAndrew R.2017. The Rights Turn in Conservative Christian Politics: How Abortion Transformed the Culture Wars. New York: Cambridge University Press.
84.
MasonCarol. 2019. “Opposing Abortion to Protect Women: Transnational Strategy since the 1990s.” Signs44(3):665–92.
85.
MauldinW. ParkerChourcriNazliNotesteinFrank W.TeitelbaumMichael. 1974. “A Report on Bucharest: The World Population Conference and the Population Tribune, August 1974.” Studies in Family Planning5(12):357–95.
86.
McCoyJenniferRahmanTahminaSomerMurat. 2018. “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy.” American Behavioral Science62(1):16–42.
87.
MearsheimerJohn J.2019. “Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order.” International Security43(4):7–50.
88.
MerrySally Engle. 2009. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
89.
MeyerDavid S.StaggenborgSuzanne. 1996. “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology101(6):1628–60.
90.
MeyerJohn W.BoliJohnThomasGeorge M.RamirezFrancisco O.1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology103(1):144–81.
91.
MeyerJohn W.JeppersonRonald L.2000. “The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological Theory18(1):100–120.
92.
MignotJean-François. 2022. “Decriminalizing Homosexuality: A Global Overview since the 18th Century.” Annales de démographie historique143:115–33.
PaxtonPamelaHughesMelanie M.GreenJennifer L.2006. “The International Women’s Movement and Women’s Political Representation, 1893–2003.” American Sociological Review71(6):898–920.
96.
PetcheskyRosalind P.1995. “From Population Control to Reproductive Rights: Feminist Fault Lines.” Reproductive Health Matters3(6):152–61.
97.
PetcheskyRosalind P.1997. “Spiraling Discourses of Reproductive and Sexual Rights: A Post-Beijing Assessment of International Feminist Politics.” Pp. 569–88 in Women Transforming Politics: An Alternative Reader, edited by CohenC.JonesK.TrontoJ. C.New York: NYU Press.
RahmanAnkiaKatziveLauraHenshawStanley K.1998. “A Global Review of Laws on Induced Abortion, 1985–1997.” International Family Planning Perspectives24(2):56–64.
101.
RamirezFrancisco O.1989. “Reconstituting Children: Extension of Personhood and Citizenship.” Pp. 143–65 in Age Structuring in Comparative Perspective, edited by ZertzerD. L.SchaieK. W.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
102.
RamirezFrancisco O.McEneaneyElizabeth H.1997. “From Women’s Suffrage to Reproduction Rights? Cross-National Considerations.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology38(1–2):6–24.
103.
RamirezFrancisco O.SoysalYaseminShanahanSuzanne. 1997. “The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women’s Suffrage Rights, 1890 to 1990.” American Sociological Review62(5):735–45.
104.
RandallAmy E.2011. “‘Abortion Will Deprive You of Happiness!’ Soviet Reproductive Politics in the Post-Stalin Era.” Journal of Women’s History23(3):13–38.
105.
RebouchéRachel. 2016. “Abortion Rights as Human Rights.” Social & Legal Studies25(6):765–82.
106.
RemezLisaMayallKatherineSinghSusheela. 2020. “Global Developments in Laws on Induced Abortion: 2008–2019.” International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health46(S1):53–65.
107.
RisseThomasSikkinkKathryn. 1999. “The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices.” Pp. 1–39 in The Power of Human Rights, edited by RisseT.RoppS. C.SikkinkK.New York: Cambridge University Press.
108.
Rivkin-FishMichele. 2013. “Conceptualizing Feminist Strategies for Russian Reproductive Politics: Abortion, Surrogate Motherhood, and Family Support after Socialism.” Signs38(3):569–93.
109.
RobertsonRoland. 1992. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London, UK: Sage.
110.
SandersRebecca. 2018. “Norm Spoiling: Undermining the International Women’s Rights Agenda.” International Affairs94(2):271–91.
111.
SchneikerAndrea. 2021. “Norm Sabotage: Conceptual Reflection on a Phenomenon That Challenges Well-established Norms.” International Studies Perspectives22(1):106–23.
112.
SchoferEvanHironakaAnnFrankDavid JohnLonghoferWesley. 2012. “Sociological Institutionalism and World Society.” Pp. 57–68 in The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, edited by AmentaE.NashK.ScottA.Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
113.
SchoferEvanLerchJulia C.MeyerJohn W.2022. “Illiberal Reactions to Higher Education.” Minerva60:509–34.
114.
ShaikhSa’diyya. 2003. “Family Planning, Contraception, and Abortion in Islam.” Pp. 105–28 in Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception and Abortion in World Religions, edited by MaguireD. C.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
115.
SimmonsBeth A.DobbinFrankGarrettGeoffrey. 2006. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
116.
SkidmoreMax J.2023. “Abortion—Reactionary Theocracy Rises in America, While Declining Elsewhere.” Politics & Society51(3):437–57.
117.
SmithChristian. 1998. American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
118.
SommerUdiForman-RabinoviciAliza. 2019. Producing Reproductive Rights: Determining Abortion Policy Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
119.
SoysalYasemin Nuhoğlu. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
120.
StoecklKristina. 2016. “The Russian Orthodox Church as Moral Norm Entrepreneur.” Religion, State and Society44(2):132–51.
121.
StoecklKristina. 2020. “The Rise of the Russian Christian Right: The Case of the World Congress of Families.” Religion, State and Society48(4):223–38.
122.
StoecklKristinaMedvedevaKseniya. 2018. “Double Bind at the UN: Western Actors, Russia, and the Traditionalist Agenda.” Global Constitutionalism7(3):383–421.
123.
StrangDavidSouleSarah A.1998. “Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills.” Annual Review of Sociology24:265–90.
124.
SunsteinCass R.2002. “The Law of Group Polarization.” Journal of Political Philosophy10(2):175–95.
125.
SuttonBarbaraVacarezzaNayla Luz. 2023. “Abortion Rights Strategies in Argentina, Colombia, and Mexico.” South Atlantic Quarterly122(2):378–85.
SymonsJonathanAltmanDennis. 2015. “International Norm Polarization: Sexuality as a Subject of Human Rights Protection.” International Theory7(1):61–95.
128.
TeorellJanSundströmAkselHolmbergSörenRothsteinBoPachonNatalia AlvaradoDalliCem Mert. 2022. “The Quality of Government Standard Dataset” (http://doi.org/10.18157/qogstdjan22).
129.
ThomasGeorge M.2021. “Relativizing Effects of Globalization, Images of the Global Field, and Religious Responses.” Pp. 100–123 in Globalization/Glocalization: Developments in Theory and Application, edited by BeyerP.Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
130.
TownsAnn E.2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
131.
TsutsuiKiyoteru. 2017. “Human Rights and Minority Activism in Japan: Transformation of Movement Actorhood and Local-Global Feedback Loop.” American Journal of Sociology122(4):1050–103.
132.
Union of International Associations. Various years. Yearbook of International Organizations. Brussels: UIA.
133.
United Nations.1975. “Report of the United Nations World Population Conference.” U.N. Doc. E/CONF.60/19.
134.
United Nations.1976. “Report of the World Conference of the International Women’s Year.” U.N. Doc. E/CONF.66/34.
135.
United Nations.1980. “Report of the World Conference of the United Nations Decade for Women.” U.N. Doc. A/CONF.94/35.
136.
United Nations.1984. “Report of the International Conference on Population.” U.N. Doc. E/CONF.76/19.
137.
United Nations. 1995. “Report of the International Conference on Population and Development.” U.N. Doc. A/CONF.171/13/Rev.1.
138.
VaggioneJuan. 2020. “The Conservative Uses of Law: The Catholic Mobilization against Gender Ideology.” Social Compass67(2):252–66.
139.
VelascoKristopher. 2018. “Human Rights INGOs, LGBT INGOs, and LGBT Policy Diffusion, 1991–2015.” Social Forces97(1):377–404.
140.
VelascoKristopher. 2023a. “Transnational Backlash and the Deinstitutionalization of Liberal Norms: LGBT+ Rights in a Contested World.” American Journal of Sociology128(5):1381–429.
141.
VelascoKristopher. 2023b. “Opposition Avoidance or Mutual Engagement? The Interdependent Dynamics between Opposing Transnational LGBT+ Networks.” Social Forces101(4):2087–116.
142.
VormannBorisLammertChristian. 2019. Democracy in Crisis: The Neoliberal Roots of Popular Unrest, translated by GillespieSusan H.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
143.
VossM. Joel. 2018. “Contesting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity at the UN Human Rights Council.” Human Rights Review19:1–22.
144.
WangCheng-Tong LirSchoferEvan. 2018. “Coming Out of the Penumbras: World Culture and Cross-National Variation in Divorce Rates.” Social Forces97(2):675–703.
145.
WooldridgeJeffrey M.2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
ZaldMayer N.UseemBert. 1987. “Movement and Countermovement Interaction: Mobilization, Tactics, and State Involvement.” Pp. 247–71 in Social Movements in an Organizational Society, edited by ZaldM. N.McCarthyJ. D.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
149.
ZappMikeFrankDavid JohnMarquesMarcelo. 2023. “Animals in World Society: Constitutional and Legislative Incorporation, 1972–2020.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology64(2):161–82.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
