Virtual and In-Person Interview Offerings in the General Surgery Residency Application Cycle: A How-to Hybrid

Abstract

Purpose

Virtual General Surgery residency interviews remain common despite the easing of travel restrictions and health risks associated with the spread of COVID-19. The primary benefits of virtual interviews include time and cost savings for applicants and programs alike. Despite these benefits, many have advocated for a return to the in-person setting, citing improved ability for applicants to assess the intangibles of a program. In the 2022-2024 application cycles, our institution offered general surgery applicants the choice to interview virtually or in-person.

Methods

Applicants who received an interview invitation for a categorical general surgery residency position at our institution could schedule either an in-person or virtual interview. Four in-person interview dates and 4 virtual interview dates were offered and filled. Applicants were ranked daily, compared only to those interviewed in the same modality. Conglomerate scores were then used to generate the overall rank list.

Results

Interviews were filled in a first-come first-serve manner with 55% of interview slots offered being in-person. A comparison of top-ranked and bottom-ranked individuals over 2 years demonstrates a near even split of their interviewing modality (60% of top-ranked candidates interviewed in person while 46.7% of bottom-ranked candidates interviewed in person, in the past 2 years). Matched candidates were also from both interview modalities (62% in-person).

Conclusion

We describe the successful implementation of a hybrid interview system that allowed applicants to choose their interview modality. Prior data has demonstrated that when afforded the choice, most applicants elect to complete at least one interview in person and attend in-person post-interview events. This preference should not be ignored. Our study demonstrates that an individualized interview process can be offered with a successful Match of candidates from both interview types, allowing candidates the power and choice of their desired modality.