How does linguistic recognition in the courtroom affect popular confidence in the justice system among minorities? The authors argue (a) the recognition of either a minority language and/or a third-party’s language (lingua franca) during judicial proceedings increases confidence levels but (b) the use of a lingua franca is more effective. This is because minorities are more likely to favor an arrangement that levels the playing field by having everyone speak a lingua franca (relative fairness) than one that allows them to use their own language in a courtroom that is otherwise dominated by the majority language (absolute fairness). Using original data measuring the linguistic recognition in the judiciary, the authors find a significant and robust relationship between languages of the court and popular confidence in the justice system.
AndersonChristopherPaskeviciuteAida. (2006). How ethnic and linguistic heterogeneity influence the prospects for civil society. Journal of Politics, 68, 783-802.
5.
AugustineAurelius. (1871). The city of God (DodsM., Ed.). Edinburgh, UK: T&T Clark.
6.
BairdVanessa. (2001). Building institutional legitimacy. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 333-354.
7.
BairdVanessa A.GanglAmy. (2006). Shattering the myth of legality. Political Psychology, 27, 597-614.
8.
BertrandJacques. (2003). Language policy and the promotion of national identity in Indonesia. In BrownM. E.GangulyS. (Eds.), Fighting words (pp. 263-290). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
BoixCarles. (2003). Democracy and redistribution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BrownDavid S.LiuAmy H. (n.d.). Democracy and minority language recognition (Working paper). University of Colorado at Boulder.
11.
BrownMichael E.GangulySumit. (2003). Introduction. In BrownM. E.GangulyS. (Eds.), Fighting words (pp. 1-18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
CaldeiraGregory A. (1986). Neither the purse nor the sword: Dynamics of public confidence in the Supreme Court. American Political Science Review, 80, 1209-1226.
13.
CaldeiraGregory A.GibsonJames L. (1992). The etiology of public support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 635-664.
14.
CaseyGregory. (1974). The Supreme Court and myth. Law and Society Review, 8, 385-419.
15.
CasperJonathan D.TylerTomFisherBonnie. (1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law and Society Review, 22, 483-507.
16.
ChanleyVirginia A.RudolphThomas J.RahnWendy M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 239-256.
CostaDora L.KahnMatthew E. (2003). Civic engagement in heterogeneous communities. Perspectives on Politics, 1, 103-112.
19.
CrosbyFaye. (1976). A model of egoistic relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85-113.
20.
De CremerDavidvan KnippenbergDaanvan DijkeMariusBosArjan E. R. (2004). How self-relevant is fair treatment?Social Justice Research, 17, 407-419.
21.
DelheyJanNewtonKenneth. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism?European Sociological Review, 21, 311-327.
22.
de TocquevilleAlexis. (2002). Democracy in America (MansfieldH.WinthropD., Eds.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1835)
23.
DeVottaNeil. (2003). Nationalism and ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka. In BrownM. E.GangulyS. (Eds.), Fighting words (pp. 105-140) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
EasterlyWilliamLevineRoss. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1203-1250.
25.
EspinalRosarioHartlynJonathanMorgan KellyJana. (2006). Performance still matters. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 200-223.
26.
FearonJames D. (2004). Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others?Journal of Peace Research, 41, 275-301.
27.
FearonJames D.LaitinDavid D. (1996). Explaining interethnic cooperation. American Political Science Review, 90, 715-735.
28.
FishmanJoshua A. (1989). Language and ethnicity in minority sociolinguistic perspective. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
29.
FolgerRobert. (1984). Perceived injustice, referent cognitions, and the concept of comparison level. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 14, 88-108.
30.
FoxJonathanFloresDeboray. (2009). Religions, constitutions, and the state. Journal of Politics, 71, 1499-1513.
31.
GambettaDiegoHamillHeather. (2005). Streetwise. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
32.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.BairdVanessa A. (1998). On the legitimacy of national high courts. American Political Science Review, 92, 343-358.
33.
GilbergTrond. (1992). The multiple legacies of history: Romania in the year 1990. In HeldJ. (Ed.), The Columbia history of Eastern Europe (pp. 277-305New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
34.
GrosskopfAnkeMondakJeffery J. (1998). Do attitudes toward specific Supreme Court decisions matter?Political Research Quarterly, 51, 633-654.
35.
GurrTed Robert. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
HamiltonAlexanderMadisonJamesJayJohn. (1898). The Federalist: A commentary on the Constitution of the United States (FordP., Ed.). New York, NY: Henry Holt.
37.
HetheringtonMarc J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92, 781-808.
38.
HorowitzDonald L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
InglehartRonald. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
JamalAmaneyNooruddinIrfan. (2010). The democratic utility of trust. Journal of Politics, 72, 45-59.
42.
KeeleLuke. (2007). Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 241-254.
43.
KeyesCharles F. (2003). The politics of language in Thailand and Laos. In BrownM. E.GangulyS. (Eds.), Fighting words (pp. 177-210) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
KoperGerdaVan KnippenbergDaanBouhuijsFrancienVermuntRielWilkeHenk. (1993). Procedural fairness and self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 313-325.
45.
LaitinDavid D. (2000). What is a language community?American Journal of Political Science, 44, 142-155.
46.
La PortaRafaelFlorencioLopez-de-SilanesAndreiShleiferVishnyRobert W. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15, 222-279.
47.
LeclercJacques. (2010). L’aménagement linguistique dans le monde [The linguistic development in the world]. Retrieved from http://www.tlfq.ulaval.ca/
48.
LeviMargaretStokerLaura. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475-507.
49.
LijphartArend. (1999). Patterns of democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
LindE. AllanKanferRuthEarlyP. Christopher. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971-980.
51.
LipsetSeymour Martin. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 53, 69-105.
52.
LiuAmy H. (2011). The linguistic effects of political institutions. Journal of Politics.
53.
MayhewDavid. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54.
McColmR. Bruce. (1990). Freedom in the world. New York, NY: Freedom House.
MishlerWilliamRoseRichard. (2001). What are the origins of political trust?Comparative Political Studies, 34, 30-62.
57.
MohsinAmena. (2003). Language, identity, and the state in Bangladesh. In BrownM. E.GangulyS. (Eds.), Fighting words (pp. 81-104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58.
MullerEdward N.SeligsonMitchell. (1994). Civic culture and democracy. American Political Science Review, 88, 635-652.
59.
MydansSeth. (2007, July31). A new country’s tough non-elective. New York Times, A4.
60.
NorrisPippa. (2008). Driving democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61.
OliverJ. EricWongJanelle. (2003). Intergroup prejudice in multiethnic settings. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 567-582.
62.
PosnerDaniel N. (2004). Measuring ethnic fractionalization in Africa. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 849-863.
63.
PutnamRobert D. (1995). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
QuillianLincoln. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat. American Sociological Review, 60, 586-611.
65.
QuillianLincoln. (1996). Group threat and regional change in attitudes toward African Americans. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 816-860.
66.
ReillyBenjamin. (2006). Democracy and diversity: Political engineering in the Asia-Pacific. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67.
RudolphThomas J.PoppElizabeth. (2010). Race, environment, and interracial trust. Journal of Politics, 72, 74-89.
68.
SchebJohnLyonsWilliam. (2001). Judicial behavior and public opinion. Political Behavior, 23, 181-194.
69.
SchererNancyCurryBrett. (2010). Does descriptive race representation enhance institutional legitimacy?Journal of Politics, 72, 90-104.
70.
ScottJames. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
71.
StoufferSamuelSuchmanEdwardDeVinneyLelandStarShirleyWilliamsRobinJr. (1949). Studies in social psychology in World War 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
72.
TajfelHenry (Ed.). (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
73.
ThibautJohnWalkerLaurens. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
TylerTom R. (1994). Governing and diversity. Law and Society Review, 38, 809-831.
75.
TylerTom R.BoeckmannRobert J.SmithHeather J.HuoYuen J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.
76.
TylerTom R.MitchellGregory. (1994). Legitimacy and the empowerment of discretionary legal authority. Duke Law Journal, 43, 703-815.
77.
TylerTom R.RasinskiKenneth. (1991). Procedural justice, institutional legitimacy, and the acceptance of unpopular U.S. Supreme Court decisions: A reply to Gibson. Law and Society Review, 25, 621-630.
78.
VanbergGeorg. (2005). The politics of constitutional review in Germany. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
79.
WeingastBarry. (1996). The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. American Political Science Review, 91, 245-263.
