Based on the 1951 Refugee Convention, traditional conceptions of refugees typically referred to the politically active male persecuted for his obstructive acts against a communist regime. Yet, today’s asylum seekers are increasingly female with very different experiences of persecution and different reasons to flee their countries of origin. Not all states have updated their asylum policies to reflect the specific situation of women—an issue the refugee crisis in 2015 brought to glaring light. We develop a Women-Friendliness in Asylum Index (WFA), which reveals clusters of states within the European Union (EU) with a solid implementation of women’s rights in their asylum recognition and reception framework and others whom have yet to adapt their asylum policies to consider women’s needs. In addition, we show that women’s political representation is a key factor in explaining women-friendly asylum policies, whereas critical attitudes toward immigrants from non-EU countries retard the gendered revision of European asylum policies.
AdcockR.CollierD. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95, 529-546.
AliH. C.QuertonC.SoulardE. (2012). Gender related asylum claims in Europe: A comparative analysis of law, policies and practices focusing on women in nine member states. Brussels, Belgium: European Refugee Fund.
4.
AllwoodG. (2017). Gender mainstreaming and EU climate change policy. In WeinerE.MacRaeH. (Eds.), Towards gendering institutionalism (pp. 43-61). London, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
AllwoodG.WadiaK. (2010). Refugee women in Britain and France. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
6.
AnkerD. E. (2002). Refugee law, gender, and the human rights paradigm. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 15, 133-154.
AppelbaumL. D. (2002). Who deserves help? Students’ opinions about the deservingness of different groups living in Germany to receive aid. Social Justice Research, 15, 201-225.
9.
ArmingeonK.WengerV.WiedemeierF.IslerC.KnöpfelL.WeisstannerD.EnglerS. (2017). Comparative political dataset. Bern, Switzerland. Available from http://www.cpds-data.org/
10.
AvdeyevaO. (2010). States’ compliance with international requirements: Gender equality in EU enlargement countries. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 203-217.
11.
BeckwithK.Cowell-MeyersK. (2007). Sheer numbers: Critical representation thresholds and women’s political representation. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 553-565.
12.
BeerC. (2009). Democracy and gender equality. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44, 212-227.
13.
BericatE. (2012). The European gender equality index: Conceptual and analytical issues. Social Indicators Research, 108, 1-28.
14.
BoixC.StokesS. C. (2003). Endogenous democratization. World Politics, 55, 517-549.
15.
BolzendahlC.BrooksC. (2007). Women’s political representation and welfare state spending in 12 capitalist democracies. Social Forces, 85, 1509-1534.
16.
BonewitA.ShreevesR. (2016). Women’s rights & gender equality: Reception of female refugees and asylum seekers in the EU case study Germany. Brussels, Belgium: European Parliament.
17.
BornschierS. (2010). Cleavage politics and the populist right: The new cultural conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
18.
BoswellC. (2000). European values and the asylum crisis. International Affairs, 76, 537-557.
19.
BoswellC. (2003). European migration policies in flux: Changing patterns of inclusion and exclusion. London, England: John Wiley.
20.
BoydM. (2006). The gender dimensions of international migration. New York, NY: Commission on the Status of Women.
21.
CasellaA. (1988). Asylum-seekers in Europe: A humanitarian quandary. The World Today, 44(11), 187-191.
22.
CaulM. (2001). Political parties and the adoption of candidate gender quotas. Journal of Politics, 63, 1214-1229.
23.
ChimniB. (1998). The geopolitics of refugee studies: A view from the south. Journal of Refugee Studies, 11, 350-374.
24.
CookR. J. (1993). Women’s international human rights law: The way forward. Human Rights Quarterly, 15, 230-261.
25.
CorneliusW. A.TsudaT.MartinP. L.HollifieldJ. F. (2004). Controlling immigration: A global perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
CrawleyH. (2000). Gender, persecution and the concept of politics in the asylum determination process. Forced Migration Review, 9, 17-20.
27.
CrawleyH. (2001). Refugees and gender. Bristol, UK: Jordan Publishing.
CrawleyH.LesterT. (2004). Comparative analysis of gender-related persecution in national asylum legislation and practice in Europe. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
30.
DauvergneC.MillbankJ. (2010). Forced marriage as a harm in domestic and international law. Modern Law Review, 73, 57-88.
31.
DaoustI.FolkeliusK. (1996). UNHCR symposium on gender-based persecution. International Journal of Refugee Law, 8, 180-183.
32.
DijkstraG. A.HanmerL. C. (2000). Measuring socio-economic gender inequality: Towards an alternative to the UNDP gender-related development index. Feminist Economics, 6(2), 41-75.
33.
DolanK. (2010). The impact of gender stereotyped evaluations on support for women candidates. Political Behavior, 32, 69-88.
34.
Domínguez-SerranoM.BlancasF. J. (2011). A gender wellbeing composite indicator: The best-worst global evaluation approach. Social Indicators Research, 102, 477-496.
35.
DufloE. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50, 1051-1079.
36.
DustmannC.PrestonJ. (2001). Attitudes to ethnic minorities, ethnic context and location decisions. Economic Journal, 111, 353-373.
37.
EdwardsA. (2010). Transitioning gender: Feminist engagement with international refugee law and policy 1950-2010. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 29(2), 21-45.
38.
EmmeneggerP.CarejaR. (2012). From dilemma to dualization: Social and migration policies in the “reluctant countries of immigration.” In EmmeneggerP.HäusermannS.PalierB.Seeleib-KaiserM. (Eds.), The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies (pp. 124-148). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
ForsytheN.KorzeniewiczR.MajidN.WeathersG.DurrantV. (2000). Gender inequalities, economic growth and economic reform: A preliminary longitudinal evaluation. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48, 573-617.
42.
FreedmanJ. (2015). Gendering the international asylum and refugee debate. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
FreedmanJ. (2017). Mainstreaming gender in EU immigration and asylum policy. In WeinerE.MacRaeH. (Eds.), Towards gendering institutionalism (pp. 145-160). London, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
GerringJ.ThackerS. C.AlfaroR. (2012). Democracy and human development. Journal of Politics, 74, 1-17.
46.
GivensT. (2004). The radical right gender gap. Comparative Political Studies, 37, 30-54.
47.
HattonT. J. (2005). European asylum policy. National Institute Economic Review, 194, 106-119.
48.
HattonT. J.RichterW. F.FainiR. (2004). Seeking asylum in Europe. Economic Policy, 19, 5-62.
49.
HawkenA.MunckG. L. (2013). Cross-national indices with gender-differentiated data: What do they measure? How valid are they?Social Indicators Research, 111, 801-838.
50.
HeitmuellerA. (2005). Unemployment benefits, risk aversion, and migration incentives. Journal of Population Economics, 18, 93-112.
51.
HernesH. M. (1987). Welfare state and woman power: Essays in state feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
52.
HoskynsC. (1996). Integrating gender: Women, law and politics in the European Union. London, England: Verso.
53.
HuberE.StephensJ. D. (2000). Partisan governance, women’s employment and the social democratic service state. American Sociological Review, 65, 323-342.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2000). The developmental theory of the gender gap: Women’s and men’s voting behavior in global perspective. International Political Science Review, 21, 441-463.
56.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
InglehartR.NorrisP.WelzelC. (2002). Gender equality and democracy. Comparative Sociology, 1, 321-345.
58.
IvarsflatenE. (2008). What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 3-23.
59.
JoppkeC. (2010). What can the United States learn from Europe?International Labor and Working-Class History, 78, 129-131.
60.
KenworthyL.MalamiM. (1999). Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces, 78, 235-268.
61.
KofmanE. (1999). Female “birds of passage” a decade later: Gender and immigration in the European Union. International Migration Review, 33, 269-299.
62.
LieneschM. (1982). Right-wing religion: Christian conservatism as a political movement. Political Science Quarterly, 97, 403-425.
63.
LipsmeyerC. S. (2000). Reading between the welfare lines: Politics and policy structure in post-communist Europe. Europe-Asia Studies, 52, 1191-1211.
64.
ListerR. (2009). A Nordic nirvana? Gender, citizenship, and social justice in the Nordic welfare states. Social Politics, 16, 242-278.
65.
LovenduskiJ.KaramA. (2002). Women in parliament: Making a difference. Stockholm, Sweden: International IDEA.
66.
MazurA. G. (2002). Theorizing feminist policy (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
67.
MeretS.SiimB. (2013). Gender, populism and politics of belonging: Discourses of right-wing populist parties in Denmark, Norway and Austria. In SiimB.MokreM. (Eds.), Negotiating gender and diversity in an emergent European public sphere (pp. 78-96). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
68.
MortensenP. B. (2010). Political attention and public policy: A study of how agenda setting matters. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33, 356-380.
69.
NeumayerE. (2005). Asylum recognition rates in Western Europe: Their determinants, variation, and lack of convergence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49, 43-66.
70.
PascallG.LewisJ. (2004). Emerging gender regimes and policies for gender equality in a wider Europe. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 373-394.
71.
PaxtonP. (1997). Women in national legislatures: A cross-national analysis. Social Science Research, 26, 442-464.
72.
PermanyerI. (2010). The measurement of multidimensional gender inequality: Continuing the debate. Social Indicators Research, 95, 181-198.
73.
PioreM. J. (1979). Birds of passage: Migrant labor and industrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74.
ReingoldB. (2006, May25-27). Women as office holders: Linking descriptive and substantive representation. Paper presented at Political Women and American Democracy conference, University of Notre Dame. Retrieved from https://rooneycenter.nd.edu/assets/11302/reingold_conference.pdf
75.
RydgrenJ. (2008). Immigration sceptics, xenophobes or racists? Radical right-wing voting in six West European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 47, 737-765.
76.
SagerM. (2012, November28-30). Feminism, asylrätt och papperslöshet i Sverige—allianser och paradoxer [Feminism, asylum law and undocumented status in Sweden—alliances and paradoxes]. G12-nationell konferens för genusforskning, Göteborg, Sweden.
77.
SansonettiS. (2016). Female refugees and asylum seekers: The issue of integration. Brussels, Belgium: European Parliament.
78.
SchenkT. S. (1994). A proposal to improve the treatment of women in asylum law: Adding a “gender” category to the international definition of “refugee.”Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 2, 301-344.
79.
SchumacherK. L. (2011). Women in state legislatures: Representation and the policy process. Denver: University of Colorado Denver.
80.
SidesJ.CitrinJ. (2007). European opinion about immigration: The role of identities, interests and information. British Journal of Political Science, 37, 477-504.
81.
SjöbergO. (2004). The role of family policy institutions in explaining gender-role attitudes: A comparative multilevel analysis of thirteen industrialized countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 14, 107-123.
82.
SpijkerboerT. (2000). Gender and refugee status. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
83.
SpijkerboerT. (2018). Gender, sexuality, asylum and European human rights. Law and Critique, 29, 221-239.
84.
StarkO.TaylorE. J. (1991). Migration incentives, migration types: The role of relative deprivation. Economic Journal, 101, 1163-1178.
85.
TogebyL. (1994). Political implications of increasing numbers of women in the labour force. Comparative Political Studies, 27, 211-240.
86.
TraunerF. (2016). Asylum policy: The EU’s “crisis” and the looming policy regime failure. Journal of European Integration, 38, 311-325.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2002). Guidelines for international protection: Gender-related persecution within the context of article 1A(2) of the 1951 convention and/or its 1967 protocol relating to the status of refugees. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
89.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2016). Initial assessment report: Protection risks for women and girls in the European refugee and migrant crisis. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/569f99ae60.html
90.
van OorschotW.ArtsW.GeliseenJ. (2006). Social capital in Europe: Measurement and social and regional distribution of a multifaceted phenomenon. Acta Sociologica, 49, 149-167.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
