Based on a communicative perspective, this article examines the theoretical
possibility of a two-fold change in European security (in the referent object of
security and in the understanding and practice of the best means of achieving
security). The approach suggested should be considered supplementary to the
rational choice perspective, and at the same time a contribution to a strengthening
of the existing ‘widening’ literature on security. It is argued
that the concepts of communicative rationality and deliberation can contribute to
this in two ways: first, by establishing alternative and more precise
micro-foundations to those provided in the rational choice perspective; second, by
providing a critical standard that allows us to escape the normative ambiguity in
security studies.
Adler, Emmanuel
and
Barnett, Michael
, eds (1998) Security CommunitiesCambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
2.
Aggestam, Lisbeth
(2000) ‘Europe Puissance: French influence and
European Independence’, in
Helene Sjursen
(ed.) Redefining Security? The Role of the European Union in European
Security Structures. ARENA Report No. 7: 67–82.
3.
Baldwin, David A.
(1997) ‘
The Concept of Security
’, Review of International Studies23:
5–26
.
4.
Brunkhorst, Hauke
(2003) ‘A Polity Without a State? European
Constitutionalism between Evolution and Revolution’, ARENA
Working Paper 14/03.
5.
Bull, Hedley
(1982) ‘
Civilian Power Europe: a Contradiction in Terms?
’ Journal of Common Market Studies21:
149–164
.
6.
Buzan, Barry
and
Waever, Ole
(1997) ‘
Slippery? Contradictory? Sociologically Untenable? The Copenhagen School Replies
’, Review of International Studies23:
241–250
.
7.
Buzan, Barry
,
Waever, Ole
and
de Wilde, Jaap
(1998) Security: A New Framework of Analysis.
Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner
.
8.
Checkel, Jeffrey
(2003) ‘Social Constructivism in Global and
European Politics (Review Essay)’, ARENA Working Paper 15/03.
9.
Cronin, C.
and
de Grieff, P.
, eds, (1998) The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political
Theory. Jürgen Habermas.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
10.
Duchêne, Francois
(1972) ‘Europe’s Role in World
Peace’, in
Richard Mayne
(ed.) Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, pp.
32–47.
London: Fontana
.
11.
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar
(2000) ‘Deliberative Supranationalism in the
EU’, in
Erik Oddvar Eriksen
and
John Erik Fossum
(eds) Democracy in the European Union.
London: Routledge
.
12.
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar
(2001) ‘Why a Charter of Fundamental
Rights?’ in
Erik Oddvar Eriksen
,
John Erik Fossum
and
Agustín Menéndez
(eds) The Chartering of Europe. The Charter of Fundamental Rights in
Context. ARENA Report No. 8: 29–52.
13.
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar
(2003) ‘Integration and the Quest for Consensus.
On the Microfoundation of Supranationalism’, in
Erik O. Eriksen
,
Christian Joerges
and
Jürgen Neyer
(eds) European Governance, Deliberation and the Quest for
Democratisation. ARENA Report No. 2: 159–225.
14.
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar
and
Fossum, John Erik
, eds, (2000) Democracy in the European Union: Integration
Through Deliberation?London: Routledge
.
15.
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar
and
Weigård, Jarle
(1997) ‘
Conceptualising Politics: Strategic or Communicative Action?
’ Scandinavian Political Studies20:
219–241
.
16.
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar
and
Weigård, Jarle
(2003) Understanding Habermas. Communicative Action and
Deliberative Democracy.
London and New York: Continuum
.
17.
Farrell, Theo
(2002) ‘
Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program
’, International Studies Review4:
49–72
.
18.
Gehring, Thomas
(2003) ‘Communicative Rationality in European
Governance? Interests and Communicative Action in Functionally Differentiated
Single Market Regulation’, in
Erik O. Eriksen
,
Christian Joerges
and
Jürgen Neyer
(eds) European Governance, Deliberation and the Quest for
Democratisation. ARENA Report No. 2: 57–140.
19.
Gärtner, Heinz
and
Hyde-Price, Adrian
(2001) ‘Introduction’, in
Heinz Gärtner
et al. (eds) Europe’s New Security Challenges.
London: Lynne Rienner
: 1–23.
20.
Habermas, Jürgen
(1996) Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse
Theory of Law and Democracy.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
21.
Habermas, Jürgen
(1999) ‘
Bestiality and Humanity: a War on the Border between Legality and Morality
’, Constellations6:
263–273
.
22.
Held, David
(1993) ‘Democracy: From City-States to a
Cosmopolitan Order?’ in
D. Held
(ed.) Prospects for Democracy. North, South, East, West.
Oxford: Polity Press
.
23.
Helveg Pedersen, Niels
(1996) ‘Danmark, NATO og
Østersjøen’, Det sikkerhetspolitiske
bibliotek. Nr. 10Oslo: Den Norske Atlanterhavskomite
.
24.
Jackson, Robert
(2000) The Global Covenant.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
25.
Jacobsson, Kerstin
and
Vifell, Åsa
(2003) ‘Integration by Deliberation? On the Role
of Committees in the Open Method of Coordination’, in
Erik O. Eriksen
,
Christian Joerges
and
Jürgen Neyer
(eds) European Governance, Deliberation and the Quest for
Democratisation. ARENA Report No. 2: 411–451.
26.
Joerges, Christian
and
Neyer, Jürgen
(1997a) ‘
From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes. The
Constitutionalisation of Comitology
’, European Law Journal3:
273–299
.
27.
Joerges, Christian
and
Neyer, Jürgen
(1997b) ‘
Transforming Strategic Interaction into Deliberative Problem-solving:
European Comitology in the Foodstuff Sector
’, Journal of European Public Policy4:
609–625
.
28.
Johnston, Alastair Ian
(2001) ‘
Treating International Institutions as Social Environments
’, International Studies Quarterly45:
487–515
.
29.
Kagan, Robert
(2003) Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New
World Order.
London: Atlantic Books
.
30.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V.
(1989) Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of
Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic
Affairs.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
31.
Lose, Lars
(2001) ‘Communicative Action and the World of
Diplomacy’, in
Karin Fierke
and
Knud Erik Jørgensen
(eds) Constructing International Relations, pp.
179–200.
New York: Sharpe
.
32.
Lynch, Marc
(1999) State Interests and Public Spheres: the International
Politics of Jordan’s Identity.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
33.
Lynch, Marc
(2002) ‘
Why Engage? China and the Logic of Communicative Engagement
’, European Journal of International Relations8 (June).
34.
Manners, Ian
(2002) ‘
Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?
’ Journal of Common Market Studies40:
235–258
.
35.
McSweeney, Bill
(1996) ‘
Identity and Security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School
’, Review of International Studies22:
81–93
.
36.
McSweeney, Bill
(1998) ‘
Durkheim and the Copenhagen school: a response to Buzan and Waever
’, Review of International Studies24:
137–140
.
37.
Menéndez, Agustín
(2002) ‘
Chartering Europe
’, Journal of Common Market Studies40:
471–490
.
38.
Müller, Harald
(2001) ‘International Relations as Communicative
Action’, in
Karin Fierke
and
Knud Erik Jørgensen
(eds) Constructing International Relations, pp.
160–178.
New York: Sharpe
.
39.
Neumann, Iver
and
Ulriksen, Ståle
(1995) ‘Norsk forsvars og
sikkerhetspolitikk’, in
Torbjørn Knutsen
,
Gunnar M. Sørbø
and
Svein Gjerdåker
(eds) Norges Utenrikspolitikk, pp.
80–105.
Oslo: Cappelen
.
40.
Neyer, Jürgen
(2003) ‘Discourse and Order in the EU. A
Deliberative Approach to Multilevel Governance’, in
Erik O. Eriksen
,
Christian Joerges
and
Jürgen Neyer
(eds) European Governance, Deliberation and the Quest for
Democratisation. ARENA Report No. 2: 57–140.
41.
Patten, Chris
(2000) ‘
Human Rights: Towards Greater Complementarity Within and Between European
Regional Organisations
’. Speech by The Rt Hon Chris Patten, Council of Europe
Conference on ‘The Protection of Human Rights in the 21st
Century’. Dublin, March 3,
2000. Available on http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/news/patten/hr_dublin_03_march2000.htm
42.
Pollack, Mark
(2003) ‘
Deliberative Democracy or Member State Control Mechanisms? Two Images of Comitology
’, Comparative Political Studies36 (February/March)
43.
Risse, Thomas
(2000) ‘
“Let’s Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics
’, International Organization54:
1–39
.
44.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas
(1995) Cooperation among Democracies: The European Influence
on US Foreign Policy.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
45.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas
(1996) ‘
Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and
Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union
’, Journal of Common Market Studies34:
53–79
.
46.
Rosencrance, Richard
(1998) ‘The European Union: A New Type of
International Actor’, in
Jan Zielonka
(ed.) Paradoxes of European Foreign Policy, pp.
15–23.
The Hague: Kluwer Law International
.
47.
Schimmelfennig, F.
(2001) ‘
The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern
Enlargement of the European Union
’, International Organization55:
47–80
.
48.
Sjursen, Helene
(2002) ‘
Why Expand? The Question of Legitimacy and Justification in the
EU’s Enlargement Policy
’, Journal of Common Market Studies40:
491–513
.
49.
Sjursen, Helene
(2003) The United States, Western Europe and the Polish
Crisis.
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
50.
Sjursen, Helene
(2004, forthcoming) ‘Security and
Defence’, in
W. Carlsnaes
,
H. Sjursen
and
B. White
(eds) Contemporary European Foreign Policy.
London: Sage
.
51.
Smith, Karen E.
(2001) ‘The EU, Human Rights and Relations with
Third Countries: “Foreign Policy” with an Ethical
Dimension?’ in
Karen Smith
and
Margot Light
(eds) Ethics and Foreign Policy, pp.
185–203.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
52.
Smith, Steve
(2000) ‘The Increasing Insecurity of Security
Studies: Conceptualising Security in the Last Twenty Years’,
in
Stuart Croft
and
Terry Terriff
(eds) Critical Reflections on Security and Change.
Portland, OR: Frank Cass
.
53.
Solana, Javier
(2001) Conference of the German–Poland Institute and the
Germany and Northern Europa Institute, Brussels,
26 June, ‘
Some Thoughts about the European Union’s New Approach towards
Central and Eastern Europe
’.
54.
West European Union (1992) Council of Ministers. Petersberg Declaration.
55.
Whalen, Edward
(1999) ‘The Military Aspects of European
Security’, in
Carl C. Hodge
(ed.) Redefining European Security, pp.
255–271.
London and New York: Garland Publishing
.
56.
Wheeler, Nicholas J.
(2000) Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in
International Society.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
57.
Waever, Ole
(1996) ‘
European Security Identities
’, Journal of Common Market Studies,
34(1):
103–132
.
58.
Waever, Ole
(1998) ‘Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity in
the West European Non-War Community’, in
Emmanuel Adler
and
Michael Barnett
(eds) Security Communities, pp.
69–118.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
59.
Waever, Ole
(2000) ‘The EU as a Security Actor: Reflections
from a Pessimistic Constructivist on Post-Sovereign Security
Orders’, in
Morten Kelstrup
and
Michael C. Williams
(eds) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European
Integration: Power, Security and Community, pp.
250–294.
London: Routledge
.
60.
Waever, Ole Buzan
,
Barry, Kelstrup Morten
, and
Lemaitre, Pierre
(1993) Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in
Europe.
New York: St. Martin’s Press
.
61.
Zürn, Michael
(2000) ‘
Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State: the EU and Other
International Institutions
’, European Journal of International Relations6:
183–221
.
