Campaigns like that of the Department of Homeland Security’s “See Something, Say Something” are intended to increase public reporting of “terrorism-related behaviors.” Yet given prior research on whom the general public considers to be a terrorist, it is likely these types of programs are instead affected by pejorative automatic associations. With this in mind, we inquire: Does implicit bias affect public reporting within a suspicious activity scenario? Through a randomized experiment using virtual reality technology, we find evidence of such bias, as manifested in whether participants indicated they would call the police when presented with a Middle Eastern male. We conclude effective counterterrorism programming should involve an awareness campaign component detailing what terrorism truly looks like in the United States.
AgerströmJ.RoothD. O. (2009). Implicit prejudice and ethnic minorities: Arab-Muslims in Sweden. International Journal of Manpower, 30(1–2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720910948384
2.
AndrewsJ. A.HampsonS. E.GreenwaldA. G.GordonJ.WiddopC. (2010). Using the Implicit Association Test to assess children’s implicit attitudes toward smoking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2387–2406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00663.x
3.
AustinM. J.DardisC. M.WilsonM. S.GidyczC. A.BerkowitzA. D. (2015). Predictors of sexual assault–specific prosocial bystander behavior and intentions. Violence Against Women, 22(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215597790
4.
BachmanR.PaternosterR.WardS. (1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a Deterrence/Rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law and Society Review, 26(2), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053901
5.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M. (2011). Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: Correlates in a sample of college students. Psychology of Violence, 1(4), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023544
6.
BanyardV. L.PlanteE. G.MoynihanM. M. (2005). Rape prevention through bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e535792006-001
7.
BeattieG.CohenD.McGuireL. (2013). An exploration of possible unconscious ethnic biases in higher education: The role of implicit attitudes on selection for university posts. Semiotica, 2013(197), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0087
8.
BennettS.BanyardV. L.GarnhartL. (2014). To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(3), 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513505210
9.
BerkowitzA. D. (2010). Fostering healthy norms to prevent violence and abuse: The social norms approach. In KaufmanK. L. (Ed.), The prevention of sexual violence: A practitioner’s sourcebook (pp. 147–171). NEARI Press.
BilligM. (1985). Prejudice, categorization and particularization: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150107
12.
BlairI. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0603_8
13.
BlantonH.JaccardJ.BurrowsC. N. (2014). Implications of the Implicit Association Test D-Transformation for psychological assessment. Assessment, 22(4), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114551382
14.
BordnickP. S.TraylorA. C.CarterB. L.GraapK. M. (2012). A feasibility study of virtual reality-based coping skills training for nicotine dependence. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(3), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511426880
15.
BoxG. P. (1949). A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria”. Biometrika, 36(3–4), 317–346. https://doi:10.1093/biomet/36.3-4.317
16.
BrownA. L.BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M. (2014). College students as helpful bystanders against sexual violence: Gender, race, and year in college moderate the impact of perceived peer norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(3), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314526855
17.
CokerA. L.Cook-CraigP. G.WilliamsC. M.FisherB. S.ClearE. R.GarciaL. S.HeggeL. M. (2011). Evaluation of green dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211410264
DonovanR. A. (2007). To blame or not to blame: Influences of target race and observer sex on rape blame attribution. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(6), 722–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507300754
20.
D’OrazioV.SalehyanI. (2018). Who is a terrorist? Ethnicity, group affiliation, and understandings of political violence. International Interactions, 44(6), 1017–1039.
21.
DolliverM. J.KearnsE. M. (2019). Is it terrorism?: Public perceptions, media, and labeling the Las Vegas Shooting. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–19.
22.
DovidioJ.KawakamiK.SmoakN.GaertnerS. (2009). The roles of implicit and explicit processes in contemporary prejudice. In PettyR. E.FazioR. H.BrinolP. (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures (pp.165–192). Psychology Press.
23.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
ForscherP. S.LaiC. K.AxtJ. R.EbersoleC. R.HermanM.DevineP. G.NosekB. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 522–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000160
26.
FoxJ.BailensonJ. N.BinneyJ. (2009). Virtual experiences, physical behaviors: The effect of presence on imitation of an eating avatar. PRESENCE: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 18(4), 294–303.
27.
FranklinC. A.GarzaA. D. (2018). Sexual assault disclosure: The effect of victim race and perpetrator type on empathy, culpability, and service referral for survivors in a hypothetical Scenario. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518759656
28.
FridellL. A. (2016). Racial aspects of police shootings: Reducing both bias and counter bias. Criminology and Public Policy, 15(2), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.121894
29.
GamberiniL.ChittaroL.SpagnolliA.CarlessoC. (2015). Psychological response to an emergency in virtual reality: Effects of victim ethnicity and emergency type on helping behavior and navigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 104–113.
30.
GattolV.SääksjärviM.CarbonC. (2011). Extending the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Assessing consumer attitudes based on multi-dimensional implicit associations. PloS One, 6(1), e15849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015849
31.
GeorgeW. H.MartínezL. J. (2002). Victim blaming in rape: Effects of victim and perpetrator race, type of rape, and participant racism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00049
32.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
33.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
34.
HoxmeierJ.O’ConnorJ.McmahonS. (2018). Undergraduate students as bystanders to sexual violence risks: Differences in reported intervention opportunities and behaviors by racial identity. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518790593
35.
HuffC.KertzerJ. D. (2018). How the public defines terrorism. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 55–71.
36.
HuitsingG.SnijdersT. A. B.Van DuijnM. A. J.VeenstraR. (2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26(3), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579414000297
37.
JourilesE. N.KleinsasserA.RosenfieldD.McDonaldR. (2016). Measuring bystander behavior to prevent sexual violence: Moving beyond self reports. Psychology of Violence, 6(1), 73
38.
KatzJ.MerrileesC.HoxmeierJ. C.MotisiM. (2017). White female bystanders’ responses to a black woman at risk for incapacitated sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(2), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316689367
39.
KearnsE. M.BetusA. E.LemieuxA. F. (2019). Why do some terrorist attacks receive more media attention than others?Justice Quarterly, 36(6), 985–1022. https://doi.org10.1080/07418825.2018.1524507
40.
KearnsE. M.YoungJ. K. (2017). If torture is wrong, what about 24?: Torture and the hollywood effect. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2483131
41.
KundnaniA. (2014). The Muslims are coming!: Islamophobia, extremism, and the domestic war on terror. Verso Trade.
42.
KurdiB.SeitchikA. E.AxtJ. R.CarrollT. J.KarapetyanA.KaushikN.BanajiM. R. (2018). Relationship between the implicit association test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 74(5), 569. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/582gh
43.
LaFreeG.AdamczykA. (2017). The impact of the Boston marathon bombings on public willingness to cooperate with police. Justice Quarterly, 34(3), 459–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1181780
MahalanobisP. C. (1927). Analysis of race-mixture in Bengal. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 23, 301–333.
46.
MitnikZ. S.FreilichJ. D.ChermakS. M. (2020). Post-9/11 coverage of terrorism in the New York Times. Justice Quarterly, 37(1), 161–185.
47.
NeeC.WhiteM.WoolfordK.PascuT.BarkerL.WainwrightL. (2015). New methods for examining expertise in burglaring natural and simulated environments: Preliminary findings. Psychology, Crime and Law, 21, 507–513.
OswaldF. L.MitchellG.BlantonH.JaccardJ.TetlockP. E. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032734
50.
ParkJ.FelixK.LeeG. (2007). Implicit attitudes toward Arab-Muslims and the moderating effects of social information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(1), 35–45.
51.
ParkJ.LeeD.ParkJ. (2012). Digital map based pose improvement for outdoor augmented reality. Paper presented at the 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Atlanta, GA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ismar.2012.6402588
52.
PearceJ. M.ParkerD.LindekildeL.BouhanaN.RogersM. B. (2019). Encouraging public reporting of suspicious behaviour on rail networks. Policing and Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2019.1607340
53.
Popa-RochM.DelmasF. (2010). Prejudice implicit association test effects: The role of self-related heuristics. Journal of Psychology, 218(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/a000007
54.
QuC.LingY.HeynderickxI.BrinkmanW. (2015). Virtual bystanders in a language lesson: Examining the effect of social evaluation, vicarious experience, cognitive consistency and praising on students’ beliefs, self-efficacy and anxiety in a virtual reality environment. PloS One, 10(4), e0125279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125279
55.
SaleemM.AndersonC. A. (2013). Arabs as terrorists: Effects of stereotypes within violent contexts on attitudes, perceptions, and affect. Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 84.
SaucierD. A.MillerC. T.DoucetN. (2005). Differences in helping whites and blacks: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_1
58.
SchubertT.FriedmannF.RegenbrechtH. (2001). The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343603
59.
ShapiroS. S.WilkM. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709
60.
SilvaJ. R.DuranC.FreilichJ. D.ChermakS. M. (2019). Addressing the myths of terrorism in America. International Criminal Justice Review, 30(3), 302–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567719833139
61.
SlaterM.RoviraA.SouthernR.SwappD.ZhangJ. J.CampbellC.LevineM. (2013). Bystander responses to a violent incident in an immersive virtual environment. PloS One, 8(1), e52766.
62.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
63.
ThornbergR.JungertT. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003
64.
ToetA.Van SchaikM. G. (2012). Effects of signals of disorder on fear of crime in real and virtual environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.001
65.
van GelderJ. L.de VriesR. E.DemetriouA.van SintemaartensdijkI.DonkerT. (2019). The virtual reality scenario method: Moving from imagination to immersion in criminal decision-making research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(3), 451–480. https://doi.org/0022427818819696
66.
van GelderJ.-L.HershfieldH. E.NordgrenL. F. (2013). Vividness of the future self predicts delinquency. Psychological Science, 24(6), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612465197
67.
van GelderJ.-L.NeeC.OtteM.DemetriouA.van SintemaartensdijkI.van ProoijenJ.-W. (2017). Virtual burglary: Exploring the potential of virtual reality to study burglary in action. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(1), 29–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427816663997
68.
Van RavenzwaaijD.van der MaasH. L. J.WagenmakersE.-J. (2011). Does the name-race Implicit Association Test measure racial prejudice?Experimental Psychology, 58(4), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000093
69.
WestK.LloydJ. (2017). The role of labeling and bias in the portrayals of acts of “terrorism”: Media representations of Muslims vs. non-Muslims. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 37(2), 211–222.
70.
WilliamsA.SteeleJ. (2016). The reliability of child-friendly race-attitude Implicit Association Tests. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01576
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
