Abstract
Much of the empirical work on carceral violence has relied on importation and deprivation theories, with limited work focusing on associations with institutional management practices. To examine the extent to which these areas of opportunity exist in studying carceral violence, this paper employs a mapping review, assessing which factors tend to be most incorporated into empirical work on carceral violence. Results suggest that much of the literature is driven by individual-level, prison data in the US context, published in criminology journals, and seldomly controls for factors related to the staff and their engagement with or perceptions of incarcerated people. Empirical work on carceral violence may benefit from greater nuance and incorporation of public management perspectives to better mitigate carceral violence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
