This study examines the extent if any by which the effect of low selfcontrol on crime is mediated by assessments of the costs and benefits of crime. It examines this idea with self-report survey data on intimate partner violence. The findings reveal that the effect of low self-control is partially mediated by the respondents’ cost considerations but not by their assessments of the anticipated benefits of intimate partner violence. While expected utility also partially mediated the effect of low self-control, we conclude that this is due primarily through the element of cost considerations.
AkersR. L. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Transaction.
2.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155–173.
3.
ArneklevB. J.CochranJ. K.GaineyR. R. (1998). Testing Gottfredson and Hirschi’s “low self-control” stability hypothesis: An exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 107–115.
4.
BarlowH. (1991). Explaining crimes and analogous acts, or the unrestrained will to grab at pleasure whenever they can. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 82, 229–242.
5.
BeckerG. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.
6.
BockR. D.AitkinM. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.
7.
BurtC. H.SimmonsR. L.SimmonsL. G. (2006). A longitudinal test of the effects of parenting and the stability of self-control: Negative evidence for the general theory of crime. Criminology, 44, 353–396.
8.
CochranJ. K.AleksaV.SanderesB. A. (2008). Are persons low in self-control rational and deterrable?Deviant Behavior, 29, 461–483.
9.
CochranJ. K.WoodP. B.SellersC. S.WilkersonW.ChamlinM. B. (1998). Academic dishonesty and low self-control: An empirical test of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behavior, 19, 227–255.
10.
De AyalaR. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. Guilford Press.
11.
Di LisiM. (2011). Self-control theory: The tyrannosaurus rex of criminology is poised to devour criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 103–105.
12.
GottfredsonM.HirschiT. (1990). The general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
13.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.Jr.ArneklevB. J. (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29.
14.
HayC. (2001). Parenting, self-control, and delinquency: A test of self-control theory. Criminology, 39, 707–736.
15.
HayC.ForrestW. (2006). The development of self-control: Examining self-control theory’s stability thesis. Criminology, 44, 739–774.
16.
HayesA. F.ScharkowM. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter?Psychological Science, 24, 1918–1927.
17.
HigginsG. E. (2007). Examining the original Grasmick scale: A Rasch model approach. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 34, 157–178.
18.
HoyleR. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage.
19.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
20.
JonesS. E.QuisenberryN. (2004). The general theory of crime: How general is it?Deviant Behavior, 25, 401–426.
21.
KeaneC.MaximP. S.TeevanJ. T. (1993). Drinking and driving, self-control, and gender: Testing a general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 30–46.
22.
KellowayK. E. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling. Sage.
23.
LeeS. Y.PoonW. Y.BentlerP. M. (1992). A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 339–358.
24.
LongshoreD. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity: A prospective test of the general theory of crime. Social Problems, 45, 102–113.
25.
LongshoreD.TurnerS.SteinJ. A. (1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 3, 209–228.
26.
MarcusB. (2003). An empirical examination of the construct validity of two alternative self-control measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 674–706.
27.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law and Society Review, 27, 467–496.
28.
NaginD. S.PogarskyG. (2001). Integrating celerity, Impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology, 39, 865–892.
29.
PiqueroA. R.MacIntoshR.HickmanM. (2000). Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al.’s self-control scale. Criminology, 38, 481–510.
30.
PiqueroA. R.PogarskyG. (2002). Beyond Stafford and Warr’s reconceptualization of deterrence: Personal and vicarious experiences, impulsivity, and offending behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 153–186.
31.
PogarskyG. (2004). Projected offending and contemporaneous rule-violation: Implications for heterotypic continuity. Criminology, 42, 111–135.
32.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.
33.
PrattT.C.TuranovicJ. J.FoxK. A.WrightK. A. (2014). Self-control and victimization: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 52, 87–116.
34.
SellersC. S. (1999). Self-control and intimate violence: An examination of the scope and specification of the general theory of crime. Criminology, 37, 375–404.
35.
StrausM. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75–86
TittleC. R. (1991). Review of A General Theory of Crime, by Michael R. Gottfredson and Travis Hisrchi. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1609–1611.
38.
TurnerM. G.PiqueroA. R. (2002). The stability of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 457–471.
39.
UebersaxJ. (1993). Statistical modeling of expert ratings on medical treatment appropriateness. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 421–427.
40.
VaughanT. J.WardJ. T.BouffardJ.PiqueroA. R. (2019). The general factor of self-control and cost consideration: A critical test of the general theory of crime. Crime & Delinquency, 65(6), 731–771.
41.
WardJ. T.BomanJ. H.JonesS. (2015). Hirschi’s redefined self-control: Assessing the implications of the merger between social- and self-control theories. Crime & Delinquency, 61,1206–1233.
42.
WardJ. T.GibsonC. L.BomanJ.LeiteW. L. (2010). Assessing the validity of the Behavioral Self-control Scale: Is the general theory of crime stronger than the evidence suggests?Criminal justice & Behavior, 37, 336–357.
WrightB. R. E.CaspiA.MoffittT. E.PaternosterR. (2004). Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals? Rational choice, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 180–213.
