The author analyzes the revealed school preferences of parents in the Washington, D.C., and asks, “What is the main determinant of charter school choice and how does it create racial, economic, and linguistic segregation?” The author first establishes a theory of choice, which incorporates past research and adds an additional variable to our understanding of school selection—school location. Through a multivariable regression, the author tests the new proximity variable against other possible determinants and finds that parental preference for neighborhood schools significantly correlates with racial segregation. The results indicate that school-choice markets, as they currently exist, reinforce the de facto segregation patterns found in urban neighborhoods.
AmreinA.BerlinerD. (2002). An analysis of some unintended and negative consequences of high stakes testing. East Lansing, MI: The Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice.
2.
ArmorD. (1996). Forced justice: School desegregation and the law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
ArmorD. J.PeiserB. M. (1998). Interdistrict choice in Massachusetts. In PetersonP. E.HasselB. C. (Eds.), Learning from school choice (pp.157-187). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
4.
BancheroS. (2010, June1). Race to top leaves some school reformers weary. The Wall Street Journal.
5.
BauchP. A. (1988). Is parent involvement different in private schools?Educational Horizons, 66, 78-82.
6.
BlastJ. L.WalbergH. J. (2004). Can parents choose the best schools for their children?Economics of Education Review, 23, 431-440.
7.
BuckleyK.FislerJ. (2003). A decade of charter schools: From theory to practice. Educational Policy, 17(3), 317-342.
8.
CooksonP. W. (1992). The choice controversy. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
9.
District of Columbia Public Charter School Board. (2010). District of Columbia Public Charter School Board: 2009 school performance report. Washington, DC: Author.
10.
EckesS.RappK. (2005). Charter schools: Trends and implications (Readings on Education, Vol. 19, pp. 1-26). New York, NY: AMS Press.
11.
FinnC. E.Jr.MannoB. V.VanourekG. (2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
FrankenbergE.LeeC. (2003). Charter schools and race: A lost opportunity for integrated education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(32), 1-48.
13.
FrankenbergE.Siegel-HawleyG.WangJ. (2010). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation and the need for civil rights standards. Los Angeles: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at UCLA.
14.
FullerB.ElmoreR.OrfieldG. (1996). Who chooses? Who losses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
15.
FullerB.GawlikM.GonzalesE.ParkS. (2003). Localized ideas of fairness: Inequality among charter schools. In BulkleyK. E.WohlstetterP. (Eds.), Talking account of charter schools: What’s happened and what’s next? (pp. 93-120). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
16.
GarciaD. (2008). The impact of school choice on racial segregation in charter schools. Educational Policy, 22(6), 805-829.
17.
GarciaD.McIlroyL.BarberR. (2008). Starting behind: A comparative analysis of the academic standing of students entering charter schools. Social Science Quarterly, 89(1), 199-216.
18.
GlazermanS. (1998, April13). School quality and social stratification: The determinants and consequences of parental school choice. Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. San Diego, California.
19.
GreeleyA. M.McCreadyW. C.McCourtK. (1976). Catholic schools in a declining church: Kansas City. Kansas City, MO: Sheed and Ward.
20.
GreenP. (2001). Racial balancing provisions and charter schools: Are charter schools out on a constitutional limb?Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 10(1), 65-84.
21.
GutmannA. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
HasselB. C. (1999). The charter school challenge: Avoiding the pitfalls, fulfilling the promise. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
23.
IcelandJ.ScopillitiM. (2008). Immigrant residential segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1990-2000. Demography, 45(1), 79-94.
24.
JenningsJ.BeveridgeA. (2009). How does test exemption affect schools’ and students’ academic performance?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(2), 153-175.
25.
KleitzB.WeiherG. R.TedinK. L.MatlandR. (2000). Choice, charter schools, and house-hold preferences. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3), 846-854.
26.
KraushaarO. F. (1972). American nonpublic schools: Patterns of diversity. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
27.
Lacireno-PaquetN.HolyokeT.MoserM. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 145-158.
28.
LeeV. E.CroningerR. G.SmithJ. B. (1996). Equity and choice in Detroit. In FullerB.ElmoreR. F. (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 70-94). New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.
29.
LevinH. M. (1989). The theory of choice applied to education (Paper No. 89-CERAS-10). Stanford, CA: Stanford University School of Education.
30.
LubienskiC. (2003). Innovation in education markets: Theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter schools. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 395-443.
31.
ManskiC. F.WiseD. A. (1983). College choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
MerrifieldJ. (2001). The school choice wars. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
33.
MironG.UrschelJ. L.MathisW. J.TornquistE. (2010). Schools without diversity: Education management organizations, charter schools and the demographic stratification of the American school system. Boulder, CO: Education and the Public Interest Center and Education Policy Research Unit.
34.
MoeT. M. (1995). Private vouchers. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
35.
NagelD. (2009, June9). Charter school support is a prerequisite for Race to the Top funds. The Journal.
36.
OrfieldG. (1995a). Segregated housing and school desegregation. In OrfieldG.EatonS. (Eds.), Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education (pp. 291-330). New York, NY: The New Press.
37.
OrfieldG. (1995b). Turning back on discrimination. In OrfieldG.EatonS. (Eds.), Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education (pp. 291-330). New York, NY: The New Press.
38.
RappK.EckesS. (2007). Dispelling the myth of “white flight”: An examination of minority enrollment in charter schools. Educational Policy, 21(4), 615-661.
39.
RPP International. (2000). The state of charter schools: National study of charter schools, fourth-year report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
40.
SchneiderM.BuckleyJ. (2002). What do parents want from the schools? Evidence from the internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133-144.
41.
SchneiderM.MarschallM.TeskeP.RochC. (1998). School choice and culture wars in the classroom: What different parents seek from education. Social Science Quarterly, 79(3), 489-501.
42.
SchneiderM.TeskeP.MarschallM. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
SolomonL. C. (2003). Findings from the 2002 survey of parents with children in Arizona charter schools: How parents grade their charter schools. Santa Monica, CA: Human Resources Policy Corporation.
U.S. Department of Education. (2009). States open to charters start fast in “Race to Top.”Washington, DC: John White.
46.
VanourekG.MannoB. V.FinnC. E. (1998). Charter schools as seen by students, teachers, and parents. In PetersonP. E.HasselB. C. (Eds.), Learning from school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
47.
WeiherG. R.TedinK. L. (2002). Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preference. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(1), 79-92.
48.
WeilerW. C. (1996). Factors influencing the matriculation choice of high ability students. Economics of Education Review, 15(1), 23-36.
49.
WelchP. (2007). How can US schools desegregate after the end of busing? Forum for Social Economics, 36(1), 53-62.
50.
WellsA. S. (1993). The sociology of school choice: Why some win and others lose in the educational marketplace. In RassellE.RothsteinR. (Eds.), School choice: Examining the evidence. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
51.
ZimmerR.GillB.BookerK.LavertuS.SassT.WitteJ. (2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
