The use of reliability generalization methodology promises to, among other things, inform researchers about the importance of reporting reliability coefficients and their use in result interpretation. This study presents results from a reliability generalization study of the Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ). The average score reliabilities produced by the instrument as well as sample and instrument characteristics that may affect those reliabilities are presented. Results varied somewhat across the three SDQ instruments and their various subscales, but internal consistency estimates were generally strong for the SDQ.
Abu-Hilal, M. M. (2000). A structural model for predicting mathematics achievement: Its relation with anxiety and self-concept in mathematics. Psychological Reports, 86, 835-847.
2.
Abu-Hilal, M. M., & Aal-Hussain, A. Q. A. (1997). Dimensionality and hierarchy of the SDQ in a non Western milieu: A test of self-concept invariance across gender. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 535-553.
3.
Abu-Hilal, M. M., & Bahri, T. M. (2000). Self concept: The generalizability of research on the SDQ, Marsh/Shavelson model and I/E frame of reference model to the United Arab Emirates students. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 309-322.
4.
Akande,A. (1999a).Interculturaland cross-culturalassessment of self-esteem amongyouthin twenty-first century South Africa. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 21, 171-187.
5.
Akande, A. (1999b). South African children conception of self. Early Child Development and Care, 152, 55-76.
6.
Beretvas, S. N., Meyers, J. L., & Leite, W. L. (2002). A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 570-589.
7.
Boyd, K. R., & Hrycaiko, D. W. (1997). The effect of a physical activity intervention package on the selfesteem of pre-adolescent and adolescent females. Adolescence, 32, 693-708.
8.
Burnett, P. C. (1994). Self-concept and self-esteem in elementary school children. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 164-171.
9.
Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1986). On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 473-481.
11.
Chung, C. H., & Watkins, D. (1992). Some evidence of the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Self Description Questionnaire. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 28-29, 39-48.
12.
Cohen, J. (1968). Multiple regression as a general data-analytic system. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 426-443.
13.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14.
Dixon, F. A., Cross, T. L., & Adams, C. M. (2001). Psychological characteristics of academically gifted students in a residential setting: A cluster analysis. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 433-445.
15.
Ezekiel, M. (1930). Methods of correlational analysis. New York: Wiley.
16.
Faria, L. (1996). Marsh's Self Description Questionnaire III (SDQ III): Adaptation study with Portuguese college students. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 343-350.
17.
Flanner, W. P., Reise, S. P., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). An item response theory analysis of the general and academic scales of the Self-Description Questionnaire II. Journal of Research in Personality,29, 168-188.
18.
Gilman, R., Laughlin, J. E., & Huebner, E. S. (1999). Validation of the Self-Description Questionnaire-II with an American sample. School Psychology International, 20, 300-307.
19.
Goñi, A., & Zulaika, L. (2000). Relationships between physical education classes and the enhancement of fifth grade pupils’ self-concept. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 246-250.
20.
Hay, I., Ashman, A. F., & Van Kraayenoord, C. E. (1998). Educational characteristics of students with high or low self-concept. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 391-400.
21.
Henson, R. K. (2000). Demystifying parametric analyses: Illustrating canonical correlation as the multivariate general linear model. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 26(1), 11-19.
22.
Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
23.
Henson, R. K., & Hwang, D. (2002). Variability and prediction of measurement error in Kolb's Learning Style Inventory scores: A reliability generalization study. Educationaland Psychological Measurement, 62, 712-727.
24.
Henson, R. K., Kogan, L. R., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). A reliability generalization study of the Teacher Efficacy Scale and related instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 404-420.
25.
Henson, R. K., & Thompson, B. (2002). Characterizing measurement error in scores across studies: Some recommendations for conducting “reliability generalization” studies. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 113-126.
26.
Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
Huebner, E. S. (1995). The Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale: An assessment of psychometric properties with black and white elementary school students. Social Indicators Research, 34, 315-323.
28.
Hunter, J. A., & Stringer, M. (1993). A short measure of self-esteem: Some data on reliability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 425-426.
29.
Hymel, S., LeMare, L., Ditner, E., & Woody, E. Z. (1999). Assessing self-concept in children: Variations across self-concept domains.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 602-623.
30.
Knapp, T. R. (1978). Canonical correlation analysis: A general parametric significance testing system. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 410-416.
31.
Maltby, J. (1995). A short measure of general self-esteem among Northern Irish university students: Some data on reliability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 1201-1202.
32.
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Negative item bias in ratings scales for preadolescent children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22, 37-49.
33.
Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417-430.
34.
Marsh, H. W. (1990). A multidimensional hierarchical self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2(2), 136-166.
35.
Marsh, H. W., Barnes, J., Cairns, L., & Tidman, M. (1984). Self-Description Questionnaire: Age and sex effects in the structure and level of self-concept for preadolescent children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 940-956.
36.
Marsh, H. W., Barnes, J., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Self-other agreement on multidimensional self-concept ratings: Factor analysis and multitrait-multimethodanalysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1360-1377.
37.
Marsh, H. W., & Byrne, B. M. (1993). Do we see ourselves as others infer: A comparison of self-other agreement on multiple dimensions of self-concept from two continents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 49-58.
38.
Marsh, H. W., Cairns, L., Relich, J., Barnes, J., & Debus, R. L. (1984). The relationship between dimensions of self-attributionand dimensionsof self-concept. Journalof Educational Psychology, 76, 3-32.
39.
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (1991). Self-other agreement on multiple dimensions of preadolescent selfconcept:Inferencesby teachers, mothers,and fathers. Journalof Educational Psychology, 83, 393-404.
40.
Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. (1991). Self-concepts of young children 5 to 8 years of age: Measurement and multidimensional structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 377-392.
41.
Marsh, H. W., Craven, R., & Debus, R. (1998). Structure, stability, and development of young children's self-concepts: A multicohort-multioccasion study. Child Development, 69, 1030-1053.
42.
Marsh, H. W., Craven, R., & Debus, R. (1999). Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: A developmental perspective. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 567-601.
43.
Marsh, H. W., & Gouvernet, P. J. (1989). Multidimensional self-concepts and perceptions of control: Construct validation of responses by children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 57-69.
44.
Marsh, H. W., & Holmes, I. W. M. (1990). Multidimensional self-concepts: Construct validation of responses by children. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 89-117.
45.
Marsh, H. W., & O’Neill, R. (1984). Self-Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensionalself-conceptratings by late adolescents. Journalof Educational Measurement, 21, 153-174.
46.
Marsh, H. W.,Parker, J., & Barnes, J. (1985). Multidimensional adolescent self-concepts: Their relationship to age, sex, and academic measures. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 422-444.
47.
Marsh, H. W., Parker, J. W., & Smith, I. D. (1983). Preadolescent self-concept: Its relation to self-concept as inferredby teachers and to academic ability. British Journalof Educational Psychology, 53, 60-78.
48.
Marsh, H. W., & Peart, N. D. (1988). Competitive and cooperative physical fitness training programs for girls: Effects on physical fitness and multidimensional self-concepts. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 10, 390-407.
49.
Marsh, H. W., Perry, C., Horsely, C., & Roche, L. (1995). Multidimensional self-concepts of elite athletes: How do they differ fromthe generalpopulation?Journalof Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 70-83.
50.
Marsh, H. W., Plucker, J. A., & Stocking, V. B. (2001). The Self-Description Questionnaire II and gifted students: Another look at Plucker, Taylor, Callahan, and Tomchin's (1997) “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall.”Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 976-996.
51.
Marsh, H. W., Relich, J. D., & Smith, I. D. (1983). Self-concept: The construct validity of interpretations based upon the SDQ. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 173-187.
52.
Marsh, H. W., Richards, G. E., & Barnes, J. (1986a). Multidimensional self-concepts: A long-term followup of the effect of participationin an Outward Bound program. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 475-492.
53.
Marsh, H. W., Richards, G. E., & Barnes, J. (1986b).Multidimensional self-concepts: The effect of participation in an Outward Bound Program. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 195-204.
54.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1996). Structure of artistic self-concepts for performing arts and non-performing arts students in a performing arts high school: “Setting the stage” with multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 461-477.
55.
Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. J. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107-125.
56.
Marsh, H. W., Smith, I. D., & Barnes, J. (1983). Multitrait, multimethod analyses of the Self-Description Questionnaire: Student-teacher agreement on multidimensional ratings of student self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 333-357.
57.
Marsh, H. W., Smith, I. D., & Barnes, J. (1984). Multidimensional self-concepts: Relationships with inferred self-concepts and academic achievement. Australian Journal of Psychology, 36, 367-386.
58.
Marsh, H. W., Smith, I. D., Barnes, J., & Butler, S. (1983). Self-concept: Reliability, stability, dimensionality, validity, and the measurement of change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 772-790.
59.
Marsh, H. W.,Walker, R., & Debus, R. (1991). Subject-specific components of academic self-concept and self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 331-345.
60.
Mocke, L. M., Greeff, A. P., & Van der Westhuyesen, T. W. B. (2002). Aspects of the construct validity of a preliminary self-concept questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 90, 165-172.
61.
Mui, F. L. L., Yeung, A. S., Low, R., & Jin, P. (2000). Academic self-concept of talented students: Factor structure and applicability of the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 343-367.
62.
Newbegin, I., & Owens, A. (1996). Self-esteem and anxiety in secondary school achievement. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 521-530.
63.
Orr, E., & Dinur B. (1995). Actual and perceived parental social status: Effects on adolescent self-concept. Adolescence, 30, 603-616.
64.
Plucker, J. A., Taylor, J. W. V., Callahan, C. M., & Tomchin, E. M. (1997). Mirror, mirror, on the wall: Reliability and validity evidence for the Self Description Questionnaire-II with gifted students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 704-713.
65.
Reinhardt, B. (1996). Factors affecting coefficient alpha: A mini Monte Carlo study. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 4, pp. 3-20). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
66.
Rowley, G. L. (1976). The reliability of observational measures. American Educational Research Journal, 13, 51-59.
67.
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2000). Psychometrics versus datametrics: Comment on Vacha-Haase's “reliability generalization” methodand some EPM editorial policies. Educationaland Psychological Measurement, 60, 157-173.
68.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 51, 101-137.
69.
Tashakkori, A., & Kennedy, E. (1993). Measurement of self-perception in multi-racial context: Psychometric properties of a modified Self-Description Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 337-348.
70.
Thompson,B. (1994).Guidelines for authors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 837-847.
71.
Thompson, B., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2000). Psychometrics is datametrics: The test is not reliable. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 174-195.
72.
Vacha-Haase, T. (1998).Reliability generalization:Exploringvariance in measurementerror affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 6-20.
73.
Vacha-Haase, T., Henson, R. K., & Caruso, J. C. (2002). Reliability generalization: Moving toward improved understanding and use of score reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 562-569.
74.
Vacha-Haase, T., Kogan, L. R., & Thompson, B. (2000). Sample compositions and variabilities in published studies versus those in test manuals: Validity of score reliability inductions. Educationaland Psychological Measurement, 60, 509-522.
75.
Vacha-Haase, T., Ness, C., Nilsson, J., & Reetz, D. (1999).Practices regarding reportingof reliability coefficients: A review of three journals. Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 335-341.
76.
Van Gurp, S. (2001).Self-concept of deaf secondary school students in different educational settings. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 54-69.
77.
Vispoel, W. P. (1996). The development and validation of the Arts Self-Perception Inventory for adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 719-735.
78.
Vispoel, W. P. (2000). Computerized versus paper-and-pencil assessment of self-concept: Score comparability and respondent preferences. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 130-143.
79.
Watkins, D., & Akande,A. (1992).The internal structure of the Self Description Questionnaire:A Nigerian investigation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 120-125.
80.
Watkins, D., Akande, A., & Mpofu, E. (1996). Assessing self-esteem: An African perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 163-169.
81.
Watkins, D., & Dong, Q. (1994). Assessing the self-esteem of Chinese school children. Educational Psychology, 14, 129-137.
82.
Watkins, D., Dong, Q., & Xia, Y. (1995). Towards the validation of a Chinese version of the Self-Description Questionnaire I. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 38, 22-30.
83.
Watkins, D., & Gutierrez, M. (1989). The structure of self-concept: Some Filipino evidence. Australian Psychologist, 24, 401-410.
84.
Watkins, D., & Gutierrez, M. (1990). Causal relationships among self-concept, attributions, and achievement in Filipino students. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 625-631.
85.
Watkins, D., Juhasz, A. M., Walker, A., & Janvlaitiene, J. (1995). The Self-Description Questionnaire-I: A Lithuanian application. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 41-51.
86.
Watkins, D., Kan, A. K., & Ismail, M. (1996). The self-conceptions of Malaysian adolescents: Assessment and cross-cultural comparisons. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 39, 144-149.
87.
Watkins, D., Lam, M. K., & Regmi, M. (1991). Cross-cultural assessment of self-esteem: A Nepalese investigation. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 34, 98-108.
88.
Watkins, D., & Mpofu, E. (1994).Some Zimbabwean evidence of the internal structure of the Self Description Questionnaire I. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 967-972.
89.
Wilkinson, L., & American Psychological Association (APA) Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
90.
Willson, V. L. (1980). Research techniques in AERJ articles: 1969 to 1978. Educational Researcher, 9(6), 5-10.
91.
Yeung, A. S., & Lee, F. L. (1999). Self-concept of high school students in China: Confirmatory factor analysis of longitudinal data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 431-450.
92.
Yin, P., & Fan, X. (2000).Assessing the reliability of Beck Depression Inventory scores: Reliability generalization across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 201-223.
