The talent development approach to the conceptualization of giftedness has historical precedent in the field. Examples of large-scale and longitudinal research studies from previous decades guided by the talent development approach are provided as illustrations. The implications of focusing on domain-specific talents in academics, the arts and sport, their individual patterns of development, and the use of eminence as a goal for programs and services in gifted education are discussed. The importance of linking theoretical debates and research with the realities of policies, resource allocation, and advocacy is emphasized.
DaiD. (2011). Hopeless anarchy or saving pluralism? Reflections on our field in response to Ambrose, VanTassel-Baska, Coleman and Cross. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 705-730.
2.
DettmerP. (1995). Building advocacy and public support for gifted education. In GenschaftJ. L.BireleyM.HollingerC. L. (Eds.), Serving gifted and talented students: A resource for school personnel (pp. 389-405). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
3.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1992). TIDE: Talent identification and development in education. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
4.
FlanaganJ. C. (1962). Project TALENT. Applied Psychology, 11, 3-14.
5.
GallagherJ. G. (1983). A model of advocacy for gifted education. In GallagherJ. G.KaplanS.SatoI. (Eds.), Promoting the education of the gifted/talented: Strategies of advocacy (pp. 1-9). Ventura, CA: The National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and Talented.
6.
GoldbergM. L.PassowA. H. (1962). The Talented Youth Project: A progress report 1962. Exceptional Children, 28, 223-231.
7.
KirschenbaumR. (1998). Interview of Dr. A. Harry Passow. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 194-199.
8.
MatthewsM. (2008). Talent search programs. In PluckerJ. A.CallahanC. M. (Eds.). Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 641-653). Waco, TX: Prufrock.
9.
PassowA. H. (1956). Planning for talented youth: A research project. Educational Leadership, 13, 249-251.
10.
RobinsonA. (2011). What can we learn from creative lives? Biography as research. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11.
RobinsonA. (2012). Can innovation save gifted education?Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 40-44.
12.
RobinsonA.MoonS. (2003). A national study of local and state advocacy in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 8-25.
13.
ShaycoftM. F. (1977). Project TALENT: A short history of a L-O-N-G project. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
14.
StanleyJ. C. (1996). In the beginning: The study of mathematically precocious youth. In BenbowC. P.LubinskiD. (Eds.). Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 225-235). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54.
16.
WittyP. A. (1958). Who are the gifted? In HenryN. B. (Ed.), Education of the gifted: 57th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2 (pp. 41-63). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
