Objective: The development of evidence-based health policy is challenging. This study has attempted to identify some of the underpinning factors that promote the development of evidence based health policy.
Methods: A preliminary systematic literature review of published reviews with ‘evidence based health policy’ in their title was conducted using PubMed as a search engine. The identified papers were critically analysed using a ‘realist review’ method, driven by the question ‘What works for whom in what circumstances and in what respects?’.
Results: Eight published reviews met the search criteria. Following the ‘realist review’, six factors that underpin the development of evidence-based health policy were identified. They are: (i) the importance and value of having multi-disciplinary teams; (ii) the need to have a broad evidence base to draw upon; (iii) the circular relationship between research and policy; (iv) the need for policy implementation to be locally sensitive; (v) the benefit of stakeholder involvement; (vi) support by the national Government.
Conclusion: The six factors identified provide a framework for consideration for those whose work involves evidence-based health policy development. As a corollary, the failure to satisfy these factors in evidence-based health policy development may lead to resistance to policy change and further work is warranted.
Sackett D.Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 1996: 312: 71-72.
2.
Kemm J.The limitations of ‘evidence-based’ public health. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2006: 12(3): 319-324.
3.
Concato J., Shah N., Horwitz RIRandomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. New England Journal of Medicine, 2000: 22(25): 1887-1892.
4.
Smith G., Pell JPParachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge . British Medical Journal, 2003: 327: 1459-1461.
5.
Potts M., Prata N., Walsh J., Grossman A.Parachute approach to evidenced based medicine. British Medical Journal, 2006: 333: 701-703.
6.
Vassall A., Compernolle P.Estimating the resource needs of scaling-up HIV/ AIDS and tuberculosis interventions in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review for national policy makers and planners. Health Policy, 2006: 76(1): 1-15.
7.
Teerawattananon Y., Russell S., Mugford M.A systematic review of economic evaluation literature in Thailand. Are the data good enough to be used by policy-makers ? Pharmacoeconomics, 2007: 25(6): 467-479.
8.
Rudan I., Lawn J., Cousens S. et al. Gaps in policy-relevant information on burden of disease in children: a systematic review. Lancet, 2005: 365: 2031-2040.
9.
Unal B., Capewell S., Critchley JACoronary heart disease policy models: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 2006: 6: 213.
10.
Pawson R., Greenhalgh T., Harvey G., Walshe K.Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Service Research and Policy , 2005: 10(Suppl 1): 21-34.
