This article looks at core arguments in international business, organization studies and surrounding academic fields that focus on the study of politicization and political contests in and around multinational corporations (MNCs). Two evident streams of debate are identified. Equally evident is that these streams hardly connect. One stream is mainly interested in studying politicization from the outside, whereas the other is mainly interested in politicization from within. As a way of connecting both streams, we introduce the circuits of power framework. Next, we introduce the contributions of our Special Issue, followed by concluding comments which distinguish five emergent themes. First, we show how the application of the circuits of power framework sheds new light on the study of political contests of MNCs. Second, we highlight that the role of nation states has not lost its significance as, for example, political corporate social responsibility (CSR) approaches would have us believe. Third, dominant ideologies play an important role in establishing and controlling circuits of power in and around MNCs. Fourth, it is vital to take labour issues into account in this field of study. Fifth, there is increasing evidence that asymmetric and hierarchical forms of organizing do not disappear in new MNC network forms.
BanerjeeS (2017) Transnational power and translocal governance: The politics of corporate responsibility. Human Relations. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0018726717726586.
2.
Becker-RitterspachFBlazejewskiSDörrenbächerCGeppertM (2016) Micropolitics in the Multinational Corporation: Foundations, Applications and New Directions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BirkinshawJ (1996) How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost. Journal of International Business Studies27(3): 467–495.
4.
BoddewynJJ (1988) Political aspects of MNE theory. Journal of International Business Studies19(3): 341–363.
5.
BoxRCMarshallGSReedBJReedCM (2001) New public management and substantive democracy. Public Administration Review61(5): 608–619.
6.
BrudneyJLWrightDS (2002) Revisiting administrative reform in the American states: The status of reinventing government during the 1990s. Public Administration Review62(3): 353–361.
7.
BrudneyJLHebertFTWrightDS (1999) Reinventing government in the American states: Measuring and explaining administrative reform. Public Administration Review59(1): 19–30.
8.
BuckleyP (2011) International integration and coordination in the global factory. Management International Review51(2): 269–283.
9.
CairnsGAs-SaberS (2017) The dark side of MNCs. In: DörrenbächerCGeppertM (eds) Multinational Corporations and Organization Theory: Post Millennium Perspectives. Research in the Sociology of Organizations49: 425–443.
10.
CalistaDJ (2002) A critique. Public Administration Review62(3): 347–352.
11.
CallonM (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: LawJ (eds) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?London: Routledge and Keegan Paul, 196–233.
12.
ChristensenM (2005) The ‘third hand’: Private sector consultants in public sector accounting change. European Accounting Review14(3): 447–474.
13.
ClarkEGeppertM (2006) Socio-political processes in international management in post-socialist contexts: Knowledge, learning and transnational institution building. Journal of International Management12(3): 340–357.
14.
ClarkEGeppertM (2011) Subsidiary integration as identity construction and institution building: A political sensemaking approach. Journal of Management Studies48(2): 395–416.
15.
CleggSR (1989) Frameworks of Power. London: SAGE.
16.
CleggSR (2010) The state, power, and agency: Missing in action in institutional theory?Journal of Management Inquiry19(1): 4–13.
17.
CleggSRCourpassonDPhillipsN (2006) Power and Organizations. London: SAGE.
18.
de BakkerFden HondFKingB (2013) Social movements, civil society and corporations: Taking stock and looking ahead. Organization Studies34(5–6): 573–593.
19.
DeanM (2013) The Signature of Power: Sovereignty, Governmentality and Biopolitics. London: SAGE.
20.
DeliosA (2017) The death and rebirth (?) of international business research. Journal of Management Studies54(3): 391–397.
21.
den HondFde BakkerF (2012) Boomerang politics: How transnational stakeholders impact multinational corporations in the context of globalization. In: LindgreenAKotterPVanhammeJMaonF (eds) A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: Pressures, Conflicts, Reconciliation. Gower Publishing: Aldershot, 275–292.
22.
DörrenbächerCGeppertMPastuhDTomenendalM (2017) Cross border standardization and reorganization in European MNCs. Final report for the European Trade Union Institute, Brussels.
23.
EdwardsPK (2017) Making ‘critical performativity’ concrete: Sumantra Ghoshal and linkages between the mainstream and the critical. British Journal of Management28(4): 731–741.
24.
EdwardsPKBélangerJ (2009) The MNC as a contested terrain. In: CollinsonSMorganG (eds) Images of the Multinational. Oxford: Wiley, 193–216.
25.
FernerAEdwardsTTempelA (2012) Power, institutions and the cross-national transfer of employment practices in MNCs. Human Relations65(2): 163–187.
26.
FoucaultM (1975/1977) Discipline and Punish – The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin Books.
GeppertM (2015) Reflections on the methods of how we present and compare the political contents of our research: A prerequisite for critical institutional research. Journal of Management Inquiry24(1): 100–104.
29.
GeppertMDörrenbächerC (2014) Politics and power within multinational corporations: Mainstream studies, emerging critical approaches and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews16(2): 226–244.
30.
GeppertMMattenDWalgenbachP (2006) Transnational institution building and the multinational corporation: An emerging field of research. Human Relations59(11): 1451–1465.
31.
GhoshalS (2005) Bad management theories destroying good management practices. Academic Management Learning & Education4(1): 75–91.
32.
HöllererMMeyerRELounsburyM (2017) Constructing domains of corporate social responsibility: A politicization of corporations at the expense of a de-politicization of society? In: KrückenGMazzaCMeyerREWalgenbachP (eds) New Themes in Institutional Analysis: Topics and Issues from European Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 194–223.
33.
HymerSH (1970) The multinational corporation and the law of uneven development. In: BhagwatiJN (eds) Economics and World Order. London: Macmillan, 113–140.
34.
JacksonALapsleyI (2003) The diffusion of accounting practices in the new “managerial” public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management16(5): 359–372.
JonesCTemouriY (2016) The determinants of tax haven FDI. Journal of World Business51(2): 237–250.
37.
KettlDF (1997) The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management16(3): 446–462.
38.
KoveshnikovAVaaraEEhrnoothM (2016) Stereotype-based managerial identity work in multinational corporations. Organization Studies37(9): 1353–1379.
39.
LatourB (1997) On actor network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt47(4): 369–381.
40.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
LevyDL (2008) Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review33(4): 943–962.
42.
LevyOReicheBS (2017) The politics of cultural capital: Social hierarchy and organizational architecture in the multinational corporation. Human Relations. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0018726717729208.
43.
LukesS (2005) Power: A Radical view (2nd edn). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
44.
MacleanMHarveyCSuddabyRO’GormanK (2017) Political ideology and the discursive construction of the multinational hotel industry. Human Relations. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0018726717718919.
45.
MezihorakP (2017) Competition for control over the labour process as a driver of relocation of activities to a shared services centre. Human Relations. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0018726717727047.
46.
MoonJCraneAMattenD (2005) Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly15(3): 429–454.
47.
MorganG (2001) The multinational firm: Organizing across institutional and national divides. In: MorganGHull KristensenPWhitleyR (eds) The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–24.
48.
MorganG (2011) Reflections on the macro-politics of micro-politics. In: DörrenbächerCGeppertM (eds) Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation: The Role of Institutions, Interests and Identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 415–436.
49.
MorganGKristensenPH (2006) The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations59(11): 1467–1490.
50.
MudambiRNavarraP (2004) Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies35(5): 385–406.
51.
MunirKA (2015) A loss of power in institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry24(1): 90–92.
52.
NigroLGKelloughJE (2008) Personnel reform in the states: A look at progress fifteen years after the Winter Commission. Public Administration Review68(1): S50–S57.
OsborneDGaeblerT (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming Government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
55.
OsborneDPlastrikP (1997) Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
56.
OstryJDLounganiPFurceriD (2016) Neoliberalism: Oversold?Finance and Development53(2): 38–41.
57.
PalanRMurphyRChavagneuxC (2010) Tax Havens: How Globalization Really Works. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
58.
Pedraza-AcostaIMouritsenJ (2018) Dynamisms of financialization: Circuits of power in globalized production networks. Human Relations. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0018726717751612.
59.
PuseyM (1991) Economic Rationalism in Canberra: A Nation-Building State Changes its Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
RoyleT (2000) Working for McDonald’s in Europe: The Unequal Struggle?London: Routledge.
SchererAGPalazzoG (2011) The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy. Journal of Management Studies48(4): 899–929.
63.
Servan-SchreiberJJ (2014) Le Défi Américain. Paris: Versilio.
StreeckW (2014) The politics of public debt: Neoliberalism, capitalist development and the restructuring of the state. German Economic Review15(1): 143–165.
66.
VaaraE (2003) Post-acquisition integration as sensemaking: Glimpses of ambiguity, confusion, hypocrisy and politicization. Journal of Management Studies40(4): 859–893.
67.
VaaraETienariJ (2008) A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review33(4): 985–993.
68.
VaaraETienariJPiekkariRSanttiR (2005) Language and the circuits of power in a merging multinational corporation. Journal of Management Studies42(3): 595–623.
69.
van MarrewijkAYbemaSSmitsKCleggSRPitsisTS (2016) Clash of the titans: Temporal organizing and collaborative dynamics in the Panama Canal megaproject. Organization Studies37(12): 1745–1769.
70.
VolkoffOStrongDMElmesMB (2007) Technological embeddedness and organizational change. Organization Science18(5): 832–848.
71.
WilliamsKGeppertM (2011) Bargained globalization: Employment relations providing robust “tool kits” for socio-political strategizing in MNCs in Germany. In: DörrenbächerCGeppertM (eds) Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation: The Role of Institutions, Interests and Identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 72–100.
72.
ZajakS (2017) MNCs and politicization from outside. In: DörrenbächerCGeppertM (eds) Multinational Corporations and Organization Theory: Post Millennium Perspectives. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 389–423.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
