The literature highlights the difficulty involved in integrating human rights and social work practice, especially among students who encounter extreme and unfamiliar social problems. Content analysis of narratives written by students during their field placement abroad contributes to identifying the conditions that are necessary to increase students’ awareness of their own obstacles and difficulties in promoting human rights. The findings provide insights into the actions that need to be taken in order to enhance human rights knowledge and to better integrate it into practice. International field placement is recommended as a preferred setting for implementing social rights practice in global contexts.
BakerS.E.EdwardsR. (eds) (2012) ‘How Many Qualitative Interviews Is Enough? Expert Voices and Early Career Reflections on Sampling and Cases in Qualitative Research’, Southampton: GB, National Centre for Research Methods. Available online at: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/336913/
2.
BellK.AnscombeA.W. (2012) ‘International Field Experience in Social Work: Outcomes of a Short-Term Study Abroad Programme to India’, Social Work Education: The International Journal32: 1032–47.
3.
CastilloJ.T.BecerraD.LeeK.AnishK.R. (2014) ‘The Role of the Government in Addressing Social Issues in India: The Perception of Indian Undergraduate and Graduate Social Work Students’, Social Work Education: The International Journal33: 31–48.
4.
Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) (2008) ‘Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards’, Available online at: http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=13780
5.
CunninghamM. (2004) ‘Teaching Social Workers about Trauma: Reducing the Risks of Vicarious Traumatization in the Classroom’, Journal of Social Work Education40: 305–17. Available online at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23044022
6.
DasC.AnandC.J. (2014) ‘Strategies for Critical Reflection in International Contexts for Social Work Students’, International Social Work57(2): 109–20.
7.
DominelliL. (2007) ‘Human Rights in Social Work Practice: An Invisible Part of the Social Work Curriculum?’ In: ReichertE. (ed.) Challenges in Human Rights: A Social Work Perspective, pp. 16–43. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
FisherT.SomertonJ. (2000) ‘Reflection on Action: The Process of Helping Social Work Students to Develop Their Use of Theory in Practice’, Social Work Education: The International Journal19(4): 387–401.
9.
GarranA.M.Werkmeister-RozasL. (2013) ‘Cultural Competence Revisited’, Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work22: 97–111.
10.
GaryM.WebbS.A. (2010) Ethics and Value Perspectives in Social Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
HawkinsC.A.KnoxK. (2014) ‘Educating for International Social Work: Human Rights Leadership’, International Social Work57(3): 248–57.
12.
HealyL.M. (2001) International Social Work: Professional Action in an Interdependent World. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
HealyL.M. (2007) ‘Universalism and Cultural Relativism in Social Work Ethics’, International Social Work50: 11–26.
14.
HealyL.M. (2008) ‘Exploring the History of Social Work as a Human Rights Profession’, International Social Work51: 735–48.
15.
HokenstadT. (2012) ‘Social Work Education: The International Dimension’, in LyonsK.HokenstadT.PawarM.HueglerN.HallN. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of International Social Work, pp. 163–78. London: SAGE.
16.
HugmanR. (2012) ‘Human Rights and Social Justice’, in GrayM.MidgleyJ.WebbS.A. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of International Social Work, pp. 372–85. London: SAGE.
17.
IfeJ. (2001) Human Rights and Social Work: Towards Rights-Based Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
JohnsonY.M.MunchS. (2009) ‘Fundamental Contradictions in Cultural Competence’, Social Work54: 220–31.
19.
JuliaM. (2000) ‘Student Perceptions of Culture: An Integral Part of Social Work Practice’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations24: 279–89.
20.
KatiuzhinskyA.OkechD. (2014) ‘Human Rights, Cultural Practices, and State Policies: Implications for Global Social Work Practice and Policy’, International Journal of Social Welfare23(1): 80–8.
21.
KimW.J. (2015) ‘Enhancing Social Work Students’ Multicultural Counseling Competency: Can Travel Abroad Substitute for Study Abroad?’, International Social Work58(1): 88–96.
22.
Kwong-KamP. (2014) ‘Back to the “Social” of Social Work: Reviving the Social Work Profession’s Contribution to the Promotion of Social Justice’, International Social Work57(6): 723–740.
23.
LaylantsM.DoelM.KachkachishviliI. (2015) ‘Students’ Perceptions of International Social Work: A Comparative Study in the USA, UK, and Georgia’, International Social Work58(1): 97–110.
24.
LyngstadR. (2013) ‘Contextual Social Work and Internationalizing Social Work Education: Two Sides of the Same Story?’, Journal of Social Work13(4): 400–418.
25.
LyonsK.ManionK.CarlsenM. (2006) International Perspectives in Social Work: Global Conditions and Local Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
NadkarniV.V. (2013) ‘IASSW and Social Work Day at the United Nations: A Proud Achievement’, International Social Work56: 252–6.
Nuttman-ShwartzO.RanzR. (2014) ‘International Social Work: A Reciprocal Working Model’, British Journal of Social Work44: 2411–25.
29.
PattonM.Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
RazackN. (2009) Decolonizing the pedagogy and practice of international social work. International Social Work52: 9–21.
31.
ReichertE. (2006) Human rights: An examination of universalism and cultural relativism. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare22: 23–36.
32.
ReichertE. (2011) Social Work and Human Rights: A Foundation for Policy and Practice, 2nd edn.New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
SaliS. (2012) ‘Globalization and Human Rights: A Complex Relationship’, paper presented at the First International Young Researchers Conference on Law: Human Rights in the 21st Century, Tirana, Albania, 18–19 May. Tirana, Albania: Beder University.
34.
SimsD.ChenuL.WilliamsJ. (2014) ‘The Global Agenda: Developing International Perspectives and Critical Discourse in UK Social Work Education and Practice’, International Social Work57(4): 360–72.
35.
SinghS.GumzE.J.CrawleyB.C. (2010) ‘Predicting India’s Future: Does It Justify the Exportation of US Social Work Education?’, Social Work Education30: 861–73.
36.
SpiroS. (2010) ‘Hakhshara leavoda sozialit beyisrael: Megamot vesugiot [Social Work Education in Israel: Trends and Issues]’, Hevra Urevaha [Society and Welfare] 29: 29–47.
37.
Tuval-MashiachR.Spector-MarzelG. (2010) Mehkar Narativi: Teoria, Yetzira Veparshanut [Narrative Research: Theory, Creation and Interpretation]. Jerusalem: Magnes (in Hebrew).
38.
UnrauY.ColemanH. (1997) ‘Qualitative Data Analysis’, in GrinnellM. (ed.) Social Work Research and Evaluation: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, pp. 512–4. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
39.
WronkaJ.BernasconiS.S. (2012) ‘Human Rights’, in LyonsK.HokenstadT.PawarM.HueglerN.HallN. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of International Social Work, pp. 70–84. London: SAGE.
