This study analyses how the Salvadoran government neglected its responsibilities to communities during the gang truce process, resorting to short-term, non-transparent, anti-democratic and counterproductive measures that allowed gangs to reorganize and take control of the territories and therefore the daily lives of the civilian population. This article focuses on the role played by the communities and how they sought to develop with the support of social workers, third-sector organizations and other development agents.
AguilarJ. (2006) ‘Los efectos contraproducentes de los Planes Mano Dura’, Quórum16: 81–94.
2.
AguilarJ. (2019) Las políticas de seguridad pública en El Salvador: 2003-2018. San Salvador: BÖLL.
3.
AlipourF.KhankehH.FekrazadH.KamaliM.RafieyH.AhmadiS. (2015) ‘Social Issues and Post-Disaster Recovery: A Qualitative Study in an Iranian Context’, International Social Work58(5): 689–703.
4.
BhattacharyyaO.ReevesS.ZwarensteinM. (2009) ‘What Is Implementation Research? Rationale, Concepts and Practices’, Research on Social Work Practice19: 491–502.
5.
BisquerraR. (2004) Metodología de la Investigación Educativa. Madrid: La Muralla.
6.
BorghC.SavenijeS. (2015) ‘De-Securitising and Resecuritising Gang Policies: The Funes Government and Gangs in El Salvador’, Journal of Latin American Studies47: 149–76.
7.
BruneauT. (2014) ‘Pandillas and Security in Central America’, Latin American Research Review49(2): 152–72.
8.
CalderaH. (2006) ‘Caminos para prevenir el surgimiento y proliferación de pandillas y maras’, Quórum16: 63–79.
9.
ChenowethL.StehlikD. (2001) ‘Building Resilient Communities: Social Work Practice and Rural Queensland’, Australian Social Work54(2): 47–54.
10.
CisternaF. (2005) ‘Categorización y triangulación como procesos de validación del conocimiento en investigación cualitativa’, Theoria14(1): 61–71.
11.
CortezG. (2008) ‘Participación comunitaria y legislación en El Salvador. Análisis de la legislación identificada’, Educare12: 25–33.
CostelloS.AungU. (2015) ‘Developing Social Work Education in Myanmar’, International Social Work58(4): 582–94.
14.
CruzJ. (2006) Maras y pandilla en Centroamérica. Las respuestas de la sociedad civil organizada, vol. IV. San Salvador: UCA.
15.
CruzJ. (2018) ‘The Politics of Negotiating with Gangs. The Case of El Salvador’, Bulletin of Latin American Research38: 1–16.
16.
CruzJ.DuránA. (2016) ‘Hiding Violence to Deal with the State: Criminal Pacts in El Salvador and Medellin’, Journal of Peace Research53(2): 197–210.
17.
CruzJ.RosenJ.AnayaL.VoroyevaK. (2017) La nueva cara de las pandillas en El Salvador. Miami, FL: Florida International University.
18.
CuéllarH.GóchezG. (2017) ‘La pertinencia de las estrategias para prevenir la violencia escolar en El Salvador’, Antiguo Cuscatlán: FUSADES.
19.
DenovM. (2010) ‘Coping with the Trauma of War: Former Child Soldiers in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone’, International Social Work53(6): 791–806.
20.
DenzinN. (1970) A Qualitative Approach. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
21.
Dickson-GomezJ.GlasmanL.BodnarG.MurphyM. (2018) ‘A Social Systems Analysis of Implementation of El Salvador’s National HIV Combination Prevention: A Research Agenda for Evaluating Global Health Initiatives’, BMC Health Services Research18(1): 848.
22.
EitoA.GómezJ. (2013) ‘El concepto de la comunidad y el trabajo social’, Espacios Transnacionales1: 10–16.
23.
FloresJ. (2016) ‘Comunidad y violencia’, Política y Cultura46: 187–207.
24.
HagedornJ. (2008) A World of Gangs: Armed Young Men and Gangsta Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) (2016) Information Gathering Mission Report – Part 1. Gangs in El Salvador and the Situation of Witnesses of Crime and Corruption. Ottawa: IRB.
26.
International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) (2012) Global Agenda for Social Work and Development Commitment to Action. Bern: IFSW.
27.
JariegoI. (2009) ‘Sentido de Comunidad y potenciación comunitaria’, Miríada2(3): 69–109.
28.
KatzC.AmayaL. (2015) The Gang Truce as a Form of Violence Intervention: Implications for Policy and Practice. San Salvador: FUNDE.
29.
KisnermanN. (1990) Pensar Trabajo Social con grupos. Buenos Aires: Humanitas.
30.
KruijtD.K.Koonings (eds) (1999) Societies of Fear: The Legacy of Civil War, Violence and Terror in Latin America. London: Zed Books.
31.
LessingB. (2017) ‘Counterproductive Punishment: How Prison Gangs Undermine State Authority’, Rationality and Society29(3): 257–97.
32.
LightfootE.SimmelinkJ.LumT. (2014) ‘Asset-Mapping as a Research Tool for Community-Based Participatory Research in Social Work’, Social Work Research38(1): 59–64.
33.
MarchioniM. (2007) Planificación Social y organización de la comunidad. Alternativas avanzadas a la crisis. Madrid: Editorial Popular.
34.
MartinA. (2009) ‘Fundamentación teórica y uso de las historias y relatos de vida como técnicas de investigación en Pedagogía Social’, Aula7: 41–60.
35.
Martínez-SalgadoC. (2012) ‘El muestreo en investigación cualitativa: principios básicos y algunas controversias’, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva17(3): 613–9.
36.
MizrahiT. (2001) ‘The Status of Community Organizing in 2001: Community Practice Context, Complexities, Contradictions, and Contributions’, Research on Social Work Practice11: 176–89.
37.
MontoyaA. (2002) ‘Desarrollo Comunitario en El Salvador’, Realidad89: 567–608.
38.
MuñozF.BolañosJ. (2011) Los habitus de la paz. Teorías y prácticas de la paz imperfecta. Granada: Universidad de Granada, Eirene.
39.
MurciaW. (2015) Las pandillas en El Salvador: propuestas y desafíos para la inclusión social juvenil en contextos de violencia urbana. Santiago: CEPAL.
40.
NadinS.CassellC. (2006) ‘The Use of a Research Diary as a Tool for Reflexive Practice: Some Reflections from Management Research’, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management3(3): 208–17.
41.
Observatorio de Desplazamiento Interno (IDMC) (2018) Una crisis fragmentada replanteando el desplazamiento causado por el crimen y la violencia en El Salvador. Ginebra: IDMC.
42.
OhmerM. (2011) ‘Citizen Participation in Neighborhood Organizations and Its Relationship to Volunteers’ and Collective Efficacy and Sense of Community’, Social Work Research31(2): 109–20.
43.
OlateR.SalasC.VaughnM. (2012) ‘Predictors of Violence and Delinquency among High-Risk Youth and Youth Gang Members in San Salvador, El Salvador’, International Social Work55(3): 383–401.
44.
ParsonsS.SherwoodG.AbbottC. (2016) ‘Informed Consent with Children and Young People in Social Research: Is There Scope for Innovation?’, Children & Society30(2): 132–45.
45.
PattonM. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
RambareeK. (2011) ‘Social Work in Rural Communities: A Case Study of Empowerment Interventions for the Eradication of Absolute Poverty in Southeast Rural Coastal Villages of Mauritius’, in GinsbergL. (ed.) Social Work in Rural Communities, pp. 39–66. Alexandria, VA: CSWE.
47.
ReynaV. (2017) ‘Estudio sobre las políticas de abordaje al fenómeno de las pandillas en El Salvador (1994-2016)’, Análisis7: 1–11.
48.
RodríguezM. (2014) ‘Participation sociale et promotion de la santé au Salvador (1970–2014)’, Global Health Promotion21(4): 1757–9759.
49.
RogowskiS. (2013) ‘Radical/Critical Social Work with Young Offenders: Challenges and Possibilities’, Journal of Social Work Practice28(1): 7–21.
50.
RoqueS. (2017) ‘Between New Terrains and Old Dichotomies: Peacebuilding and the Gangs’ Truce in El Salvador’, Contexto Internacional39(3): 499–520.
51.
SampóC.BartoloméM. (2014) ‘Reflexiones sobre el cumplimiento de la tregua entre maras en El Salvador’, Estudios Internacionales46(177): 89–106.
52.
SánchezA. (2001) ‘Medida y estructura interna del sentimiento de comunidad: un estudio empírico’, Revista de Psicología Social16(2): 157–75.
53.
SantacruzM. (2006) Experiencias participativas con jóvenes en proyectos de promoción del desarrollo y prevención de la violencia. El caso de El Salvador. Washington, DC: OPS – GTZ.
54.
SantamarinaC.MarinasJ. (1995) ‘Historias de vida e historia oral’, in DelgadoJ.M.GutiérrezJ. (eds) Métodos y técnicas cualitativas de investigación en ciencias sociales, pp. 259–287. Madrid: Síntesis.
SpitzerH.MurekasengeJ.MuchiriS. (2014) ‘Social Work in Burundi’s Post-Conflict Society’, in SpitzerH.TwikirizeJ.WairireG. (eds) Professional Social Work in East Africa Towards Social Development, Poverty Reduction and Gender Equality, pp. 149–61. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.
57.
TagerA.G.AguilarI. (2013) La tregua entre pandillas salvadoreñas, hacia un proceso de construcción de paz social. Guatemala: Interpeace.
58.
TaylorJ. (2016) ‘Crises in Civil Society Organizations: Opportunities for Transformation’, Development in Practice26(5): 663–9.
59.
TongA.SainsburyP.CraigJ. (2007) ‘Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups’, International Journal for Quality in Health Care19(6): 349–57.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2010) Nota de orientación sobre las solicitudes de la condición de refugiado relacionadas con las víctimas de pandillas organizadas. Ginebra: UNHCR.
62.
WeissP. (2008) ‘El Salvador: A Case Study in the Role of the Affected State in Humanitarian Action’, report, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, March.
63.
Wells-WilbonR.McPhatterA.VakalahiH. (eds) (2015) Social Work Practice with African Americans in Urban Environments. New York: Springer.
64.
WolfS. (2008) ‘The Politics of Gang Control. NGO Advocacy in Post-War El Salvador’, PhD Thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff.
65.
YuleA. (2008) ‘Investing in Youth for Violence Prevention: Gang Rehabilitation Programs in El Salvador’, PhD Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
66.
Zack-WilliamsT. (2006) ‘Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone and the Problems of Demobilisation, Rehabilitation and Reintegration into Society: Some Lessons for Social Workers in War-Torn Societies’, Social Work Education25(2): 119–28.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
