The development and enactment of leadership involves paradoxical tensions. Cultural and organizational forces increasingly reflect an awareness of paradox. Leadership is correspondingly understood as having paradoxical aspects. I address the relationship between leadership and paradox and explore the utility of the competing values framework as a means to develop leadership skill from a paradox perspective. The competing values framework can support the development of a more paradoxical view of leadership that encourages greater leader behavioral and cognitive complexity as well as increased leader flexibility. Furthermore, the capacities of awareness, exploration, and interpretation are identified as possible resources to advance paradoxical conceptualizations of leadership.
AmmeterA. P.DouglasC.GardnerW. L.HochwarterW. A.FerrisG. R. (2002). Toward a political theory of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 751-796.
2.
ArgyrisC.SchonD. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
ArgyrisC.SchonD. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
BartunekJ. (1988). The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. In QuinnR.CameronK. (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 137-162). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
5.
BassB. M. (1960). Leadership, psychology, and organizational behavior. New York, NY: Harper.
6.
BirkinshawJ.GuptaK. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 287-298.
7.
BlakeR. R.MoutonJ. S. (1964). The managerial grid: Key orientations for achieving productivity through people. Houston, YX: Gulf.
8.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper.
9.
CameronK. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32, 539-553.
10.
CameronK. S. (2008). Paradox in positive organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 7-24.
11.
CameronK. S.LavineM. (2006). Making the impossible possible: Leading extraordinary performance, the Rocky Flats story. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
12.
CameronK. S.QuinnR. E. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. In QuinnR.CameronK. (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a Theory of change in organization and management (pp. 137-162). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
13.
CameronK. S.QuinnR. E. (2005). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
CameronK. S.QuinnR. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
CameronK. S.QuinnR. E.DeGraffJ.ThakorA. V. (2007). Competing values leadership: Creating values in organizations. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
16.
Center for Collaborative Leadership & Human Capital Leadership Institute, (2012). The five paradoxes of leadership development in Asia. Retrieved from http://www.ccl.org/Leadership/news/2012/hcli.aspx
17.
DennisonD. R.HooijbergR.QuinnR. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6, 524-540.
18.
EisenhardtK. M. (2000). Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of pluralism. Academy of Management Review, 25, 703-705.
19.
FoldyE. G.GoldmanL.OspinaS. (2008). Sensegiving and the role of cognitive shifts in the work of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 514-529.
20.
GiekD. G.LeesP. L. (1993). On massive change: Using the competing values framework to organize the educational efforts of the human resource function in New York state government. Human Resource Management, 32, 9-28.
21.
GoodD. J.SharmaG. (2010). A little more rigidity: firming the construct of leader flexibility. Journal of Change Management, 10, 155-174.
22.
HandyC. (1994). The age of paradox. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
23.
HerzbergF. (1964). The Motivation-Hygiene Concept and Problems of Manpower, Personnel Administrator, 27, 3–7.
24.
HiggsM.RowlandD. (2011). What does it take to implement change successfully? A study of the behaviours of successful change leaders. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47, 309-335.
25.
HooijbergR.BullisC. R.HuntJ. G. (1999). Behavioral complexity and the development of military leadership for the twenty-first century. In HuntJ. G.DodgeG. E.WongL. (Eds.), Out-of-the-box leadership: Transforming the twenty-first-century army and other top performing organizations (pp. 111-130). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
26.
JunniP.SaralaR. M.TarasV.TarbaS. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 299-312.
27.
KaiserR. B.LindbergJ. T.CraigS. B. (2007). Assessing the flexibility of managers: A comparison of methods. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 40-55.
28.
KanM. M.ParryK. W. (2004). Identifying paradox: A grounded theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 467-491.
29.
KeganR. (1983). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
KeganR.LaheyL. L. (2002). How the way we talk can change the way we work: Seven languages for transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
LavineM.CameronK. S. (2012).From weapons to wildlife: positive organizing in practice. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 135-145.
32.
LawrenceK. A.LenkP.QuinnR. E. (2009). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psychometric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 87-102.
33.
LawrenceP. R.LorschJ. W. (1967). Organization and environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, Division of Research.
34.
LewisM. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760-776.
35.
LuscherL. S.LewisM. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 221-240.
36.
MaitlisS.LawrenceT. B. (2007). Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 57-84.
37.
MarshS.MacalpineM. (1999). The search for reconciling insights: A “really useful” tool for managing paradox. Journal of Management Development, 18, 642-651.
38.
McKelveyB.BoisotM. H. (2003, August). Transcendental organizational foresight in nonlinear contexts. Paper presented at the INSEAD Conference on Expanding Perspectives on Strategy Processes, Fontainenbleau, France.
39.
Miron-SpektorE.GinoF.ArgoteL. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creativity sparks: Enhancing creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 229-240.
40.
MirvisP. H. (1985). Work in the 20th century: America’s trends and tracts, visions and values, economic and human developments. Cambridge, MA: Rudi Press.
41.
O’ReillyC.TushmanM. L. (2011). Ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53, 5-22.
42.
PooleM. S.Van De VenA. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562-578.
43.
QuinnR. E. (1988). Beyond rational management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44.
QuinnR.E. (1984). Applying the Competing Values Approach to Leadership. Leaders and Managers: International Perspectives on Managerial Behavior and Leadership, HuntJ.HoskingD.SchriesheimC.StewardR., eds. New York: Pergamon.
45.
QuinnR. E.CameronK. S. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29, 33-51.
46.
QuinnR. E.FaermanS. R.ThompsonM. P.McGrathM.St.ClairL. S. (2010). Becoming a master manager: A competing values approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
47.
QuinnR. E.KahnJ. A.MandlM. J. (1994). Perspectives on organizational change: Exploring movement at the interface. In GreenbergJ. (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 109-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
QuinnR. E.RohrbaughJ. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29, 363-377.
49.
RookeD.TorbertW. R. (2005). Seven transformations of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 83(4), 67-76.
50.
SharmaG.GoodD. J. (2013). The work of middle managers: Sensemaking and sensegiving for creating positive social change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49, 95-122.
51.
SmircichL.MorganG. (1982). Leadership: The management of meaning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 257-273.
52.
SmithW. K.BesharovM. L.WesselsA. K.ChertokM. (2012). A paradoxical model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 463-478.
53.
SmithW. K.LewisM. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 391-403.
54.
SmithW. K.LewisM. W. (2012). Leadership skills for managing paradox. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5, 232-235.
55.
SpreitzerG. M.QuinnR. E. (1996). Empowering middle managers to be transformational leaders. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 237-261.
56.
TorbertW. R. (2004). Action inquiry: The secret of timely and transforming leadership. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
57.
TushmanM. L.SmithW. K.BinnsA. (2011). The ambidextrous CEO. Harvard Business Review, June, 74-80.
58.
Uhl-BienM.MarionR.McKelveyB. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298-318.
59.
VaillP. B. (1996). Learning as a way of being: strategies for survival in a world of permanent whitewater. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409-421.
61.
ZaccaroS. J.FotiR. J.KennyD. A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 308-315.
62.
ZaccaroS. J.GilbertJ. A.ThorK. K.MumfordM. D. (1991). Leadership and social intelligence: Linking social perspectiveness and behavioral flexibility to leader effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 317-342.
