The impact of the political characteristics of national leaders on the management of territorial disputes is investigated to learn what kinds of leaders are more likely to resort to strategies of peaceful resolution. The choice to pursue strategies of accommodation and compromise is in part a function of leaders' time in office and the reputation they have established through their international conflict behavior and their military expertise. This is because leaders face different incentives as their tenure in office grows longer and because their reputation can be a form of expendable political capital that enables leaders to initiate a significant foreign policy change. A territorial dispute data set and a leader data set for the period from 1950 to 1990 are used to test this argument. An analysis using ordered probit models gives credence to the conjecture that leaders' characteristics are systematically associated with the choice of pursuing a peaceful resolution of a territorial dispute.
Allock, John , Guy Arnold, Alan Day, D. S. Lewis, Lorimer Poultney, Roland Rance, and D. J. Sagar. 1992. Border and territorial disputes. 3d ed.London: Longman.
2.
Bennett, D. Scott . 1998. Integrating and testing models of rivalry duration. American Journal of Political Science42:1200-1232.
3.
Bennett, D. Scott , and Allan C. Stam. 2001. EUGene: Expected utility generation and data management program. Version 2.013. Available from http://eugenesoftware.org.
4.
Bienen, Henry , and Nicolas van de Walle. 1991. Of time and power: Leadership duration in the modern world. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Brecher, Michael , and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 1997. A study of crisis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6.
Brown, Archie . 1982. Leadership succession and policy innovation. In Soviet policy for the 1980s, edited by Archie Brown and Michael Kaser, 223-253. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7.
Brunk, Gregory G. , and Thomas G. Minehart. 1984. How important is elite turnover to policy change?American Journal of Political Science28:559-569.
8.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce . 1981. The war trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Bueno de Mesquita , Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith. 2001. Political survival and international conflict. In War in a changing world, edited by Zeev Maoz and Azar Gat, 183-206. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Bueno de Mesquita , Bruce, and Randolph M. Siverson. 1995. War and the survival of political leaders: A comparative study of regime types and political accountability. American Political Science Review89:841-855.
11.
Bunce, Valerie . 1981. Do new leaders make a difference? Executive succession and public policy under capitalism and socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Butler, David , Ashok Lahiri, and Prannoy Roy. 1995. India decides: Elections 1952-1995. New Delhi, India: Books and Things.
13.
Byman, Daniel L. , and Kenneth M. Pollack. 2001. Let us now praise great men: Bringing the statesman back in. International Security25:107-146.
14.
Copeland, Dale C.1997. Do reputations matter?Security Studies7:33-71.
15.
Cukierman, Alex , and Mariano Tommasi. 1998. When does it take a Nixon to go to China?American Economic Review88:180-197.
16.
Dixon, William J.1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review88:14-32.
17.
Downs, Anthony . 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
18.
Drazen, Allen , and Paul Masson. 1994. Credibility of policies versus credibility of policy makers. Quarterly Journal of Economics109:745-754.
19.
Fearon, James D.1994. Signaling versus the balance of power and interests: an empirical test of a crisis bargaining model. Journal of Conflict Resolution38:236-269.
20.
Friedrich, Robert J.1982. In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science26:797-833.
21.
Geller, Daniel S.2000. Material capabilities: Power and international conflict. In What do we know about war?, edited by John A. Vasquez, 259-277. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
22.
Gelpi, Christopher . 1999. Alliances as instruments of intra-allied control. In Imperfect unions: Security institutions over time and space, edited by Helga Haftendorn, Robert O. Keohane, and Celeste A. Wallander, 107-139. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
Gelpi, Christopher , and Joseph M. Grieco. 2001. Attracting trouble: Democracy, leadership tenure, and the targeting of militarized challenges. Journal of Conflict Resolution45:794-817.
24.
Gelpi, Christopher F. , and Michael Griesdorf. 2001. Winners or losers? Democracies in international crisis, 1918-94. American Political Science Review95:633-647.
25.
Gibler, Douglas . 1999. Alliances that never balance: The territorial-settlement treaty. In A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict, edited by Paul F. Diehl, 181-204. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
26.
Gill, Jeff . 2001. Interpreting interactions and interaction hierarchies in generalized linear models: Issues and applications. Paper presented at the 2001 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30 to September 2, in San Francisco.
27.
Goertz, Gary , and Paul F. Diehl. 1992. Territorial changes and international conflict. New York: Routledge.
28.
Gorvin, Ian , ed. 1989. Elections since 1945: A worldwide reference compendium. Harlow, UK: Longman.
29.
Gouldner, Alvin W.1954. Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press.
30.
Grieco, Joseph M.2001. Repetitive military challenges and recurrent international conflicts, 1918-1994. International Studies Quarterly45:295-316.
31.
Hensel, Paul R.1994. One things leads to another: Recurrent militarized disputes in Latin America, 1816-1986. Journal of Peace Research31:281-298.
32.
Hensel, Paul R.1999. Charting a course to conflict: Territorial issues and interstate conflict, 1916-1992. In A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict, edited by Paul F. Diehl, 115-146. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
33.
Hensel, Paul R.2000. Territory: Theory and evidence on geography and conflict. In What do we know about war?, edited by John A. Vasquez, 57-84. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
34.
Holsti, Kalevi . 1991. Peace and war: Armed conflicts and international order, 1648-1989. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Huth, Paul K.1988. Extended deterrence and the prevention of war. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
Huth, Paul K.1996. Standing your ground: Territorial disputes and international conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
Huth, Paul K.1997. Reputations and deterrence: A theoretical and empirical assessment. Security Studies7:72-99.
38.
Huth, Paul K.1999. Enduring rivalries and territorial disputes, 1950-1990. In A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict, edited by Paul F. Diehl, 37-72. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
39.
Huth, Paul K.2000. Territory: Why are territorial disputes between states a central cause of international conflict? In What do we know about war?, edited by John A. Vasquez, 85-110. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
40.
Huth, Paul K. , Christopher Gelpi, and D. Scott Bennett. 1993. The escalation of great power militarized disputes: Testing rational deterrence theory and structural realism. American Political Science Review87:609-623.
41.
Jervis, Robert . 1976. Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
Kacowicz, Arie M.1994. Peaceful territorial change. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
43.
Kaufman, Herbert . 1971. The limits of organizational change. University: University of Alabama Press.
44.
King, Gary , Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44:347-361.
45.
Kreps, David M. , and Robert Wilson. 1982. Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory27:253-279.
46.
Lentz III , Harris M.1994. Heads of states and governments: A worldwide encyclopedia of over 2,300 leaders, 1945 through 1992. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
47.
Lippmann, Walter . 1955. Essays in public philosophy. Boston: Little, Brown.
48.
Long, J. Scott . 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Mackie, Thomas T. , and Richard Rose. 1982. The international almanac of electoral history. 2nd ed.New York: Facts on File.
50.
Maoz, Zeev , and Bruce Russett. 1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review87:624-638.
51.
Mercer, Jonathan . 1996. Reputation and international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
52.
Morgenthau, Hans J.1973. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Knopf.
53.
Newman, David . 1999. Real spaces, symbolic spaces: Interrelated notions of territory in the Arab-Israeli conflict. In A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict, edited by Paul F. Diehl, 3-36. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
54.
Polity IV Project . 2000. Polity IV dataset (Computer file, version p4v2000). College Park: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.
55.
Rodrik, Dani . 1993. The positive economics of policy reform. American Economic Review83:356-361.
56.
Roeder, Philip G.1985. Do new Soviet leaders really make a difference? Rethinking the “succession connection.”American Political Science Review79:958-976.
57.
Rosenau, James N.1961. Public opinion and foreign policy: An operational formulation. New York: Random House.
58.
Rousseau, David L. , Christopher Gelpi, Dan Reiter, and Paul K. Huth. 1996. Assessing the dyadic nature of the democratic peace, 1919-88. American Political Science Review90:512-533.
59.
Safire, William . 2002. Man of peace. New York Times, May 6, sec. A, p. 25.
60.
Schelling, Thomas C.1960. The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
Selten, Reinhard . 1978. The chain store paradox. Theory and Decision9:127-159.
62.
Senese, Paul D.1999. Geographical proximity and issue salience: Their effects on the escalation of militarized interstate conflict. In A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict, edited by Paul Diehl, 147-180. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
63.
Stokes, Susan C.1999. What do policy switches tell us about democracy? In Democracy, accountability, and representation, edited by Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, 98-130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Tomz, Michael , Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 2001. CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.0. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Available from http://gking.harvard.edu/.
65.
Vasquez, John A.1993. The war puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
Vasquez, John A.1995. Why do neighbors fight? Proximity, interaction, and territoriality. Journal of Peace Research32:277-293.
67.
Vasquez, John A. , and Marie T. Henehan. 2001. Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816-1992. Journal of Peace Research38:123-138.
68.
Walter, Barbara F. 2000. Explaining the indivisibility of territory. Paper prepared for delivery at the 2000 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31 to September 3, in Washington, DC.
69.
Waltz, Kenneth N.1959. Man, the state, and war: A theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
70.
Waltz, Kenneth N.1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
71.
Weber, Max . 1946. Politics as a vocation. In From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, translated and edited by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 77-128. New York: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
