Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The phenomenon of suicide attacks has dramatically expanded over the last twenty years, rising from no events in 1980 to a total of 1,398 events by 2008. A prominent theory has argued that suicide attacks are a coercive strategy aimed at ending foreign military occupation by democracies. Yet these conclusions are based on a research design that is affected by selection bias and that fails to distinguish foreign occupations from cases of groups seeking independence or autonomy, which we term domestic occupations. Analyzing an original data set that distinguishes the different types of occupation, we find that only foreign occupations have a strong and consistent effect on the incidence of suicide attacks. The reason, we argue, is that suicide attacks only become cost effective when targets are both hardened and accessible, a strategic environment that is more common to civil wars and foreign occupations than to domestic occupations.

Keywords

suicide attacks foreign occupation terrorism insurgency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahms

2006. “Why Terrorism Does Not Work.” International Security 31 (2): 42–78.

Abrahms

2007. “Why Democracies Make Superior Counterterrorists.” Security Studies 16 (2): 223–53.

Abrahms

2012. “The Political Effectiveness of Terrorism Revisited.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (3): 366–93.

Ashworth

Clinton

J. D.

Meirowitz

Ramsay

K. W.

. 2008a. “Design, Inference, and the Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism.” American Political Science Review 102 (2): 269–73.

Ashworth

Clinton

J. D.

Meirowitz

Ramsay

K. W.

. 2008b. “Design, Inference, and the Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism: A Rejoinder.” Unpublished manuscript.

Atran

2006. “The Moral Logic and Growth of Suicide Terrorism.” The Washington Quarterly 29 (2): 127–47.

Benvenisti

1993. The International Law of Occupation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Berman

Laitin

. 2008. “Religion, Terrorism and Public Goods: Testing the Club Model.” Journal of Public Economics 92 (10-11): 1942–67.

Bloom

, 2005. Dying to Kill: The Allure of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.

10.

Boot

, 2011. “Suicide by Bomb: Misunderstanding a Weapon in the Terrorist’s Arsenal.” The Weekly Standard 16 (43): 36–39.

11.

CIA (Central Intelligence Agency). 2010. The World Factbook 2010. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.

12.

Collier

Hoeffler

. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers 56 (4): 563–95.

13.

CPOST (Chicago Project on Security and Terrorism). 2010. Suicide Attack Database. Chicago: University of Chicago.

14.

Crenshaw

2007. “Explaining Suicide Terrorism: A Review Essay.” Security Studies 16 (1): 133–62.

15.

Davies

, 2006. Indonesia’s War over Aceh: Last Stand on Mecca’s Porch. New York: Taylor & Francis.

16.

Fearon

J. D.

Laitin

D. D.

. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 75–90.

17.

Gleditsch

N. P

Wallensteen

Eriksson

Sollenberg

Strand

. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 39 (5): 615–37.

18.

Goodwin

2006. “What Do We Really Know About (Suicide) Terrorism?” Sociological Forum 21 (2): 315–30.

19.

Heston

Summers

Aten

. 2009. “Penn World Table Version 6.3.” Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, PA.

20.

Hilbe

J. M.

2011. Negative Binomial Regression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Horowitz

M. C.

2010. “Nonstate Actors and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Suicide Terrorism.” International Organization 64 (1): 33–64.

22.

ICRC (International Committee of Red Cross). 1949. Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva, Switzerland: International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC), August 12.

23.

Juergensmeyer

2003. Terror in the Mind of God. Berkeley: University of California Press.

24.

Kalyvas

S. N.

, 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Kydd

A. H.

Walter

. 2006. “The Strategies of Terrorism.” International Security 31 (1): 49–79.

26.

Lyall

Wilson

. 2009. “Rage against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars.” International Organization 63 (1): 67–106.

27.

Marshall

M. G

Gurr

T. R

Jaggers

. 2009. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2009, Dataset Users’ Manual. College Park: University of Maryland.

28.

Minorities at Risk Project. 2009. Minorities at Risk Dataset. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management.

29.

Moghadam

2006. “Suicide Terrorism, Occupation, and the Globalization of Martyrdom: A Critique of Dying to Win.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29 (8): 707–29.

30.

Moghadam

2009. “Motives for Martyrdom: Al-Qaida, Salafi Jihad, and the Spread of Suicide Attacks.” International Security 33 (3): 46–78.

31.

National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. (START). 2011. Global Terror- ism Database. College Park, MD: START.

32.

Pape

R. A.

, 2003. “The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism.” American Political Science Review 97 (3): 343–61.

33.

Pape

R. A.

, 2005. Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Random House.

34.

Pape

R. A.

2008. “Methods and Findings in the Study of Suicide Terrorism.” American Political Science Review 102 (2): 275–77.

35.

Pape

R. A.

Feldman

J. K.

. 2010. Cutting the Fuse: The Explosion of Global Suicide Terrorism and How to Stop It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

36.

Pedahzur

2006. Root Causes of Suicide Terrorism: The Globalization of Martyrdom. New York: Routledge.

37.

Piazza

J. A.

2008. “A Supply-Side View of Suicide Terrorism: a Cross-National Study.” The Journal of Politics 70 (1): 28–39.

38.

Przeworski

Alvarez

M. E

Cheibub

J. A.

Limongi

. 2000. Democracy and Development; Political Institutions and Well-being in the World, 1950-1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.

39.

Roberts

1984. “What Is a Military Occupation?” British Yearbook of International Law 55: 249–305.

40.

Sarkees

M. R.

Wayman

F. W.

. 2010. Resort to War 1816-2007. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

41.

Savun

Phillips

B. J.

. 2009. “Democracy, Foreign Policy, and Terrorism.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (6): 878–904.

42.

Sechser

T. S.

Saunders

E. N.

. 2010. “The Army You Have: The Determinants of Military Mechanization, 1979–2001.” International Studies Quarterly 54 (2): 481–511.

43.

Sprinzak

2000. “Rational Fanatics.” Foreign Policy (120): 66–73.

44.

Stephan

M. J.

Chenoweth

. 2008. “Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict.” International Security 33 (1): 7–44.

45.

United States Department of Defense. 2009. “Base Structure Report Fiscal Year 2009 Baseline.” Washington, DC: US Department of Defense.

46.

United States Department of the Army. 1956. The Law of Land Warfare. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

47.

Wade

S. J.

Reiter

. 2007. “Does Democracy Matter?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (2): 329–48.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.25 MB