Does international recognition of statehood affect support for territorial compromise among groups engaged in struggles for self-determination? We show that, contrary to skepticism about the impact of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), international recognition of statehood by the UNGA shapes mass attitudes toward territorial compromise. The impact of international recognition, however, is two-pronged. International recognition simultaneously increases support for partition as a strategy of conflict resolution and decreases support for compromise on the territorial terms of partition. We also suggest a logic to explain these impacts of international recognition based on the intuition that international recognition should improve the bargaining position of the newly recognized group. We demonstrate that international recognition has an impact on mass attitudes of groups in conflict using a combination of a panel survey and survey experiment assessing the impact of the 2012 UNGA recognition of Palestine. This study is the first to show that international recognition can shape mass attitudes toward conflict.
AndersonJamesO’DowdLiam. 2007. “Imperialism and Nationalism: The Home Rule Struggle and Border Creation in Ireland, 1885–1925.” Political Geography26 (8): 934–50.
2.
An-Najah. 2012. “An-Najah Poll of Palestinians: 72.1%:23.2% Oppose One State for Both Palestinians and Israelis.” An-Najah, October 11. Accessed September 24, 2014. http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=58563.
3.
ArianAsherShamirMichalVenturaRaphael. 1992. “Public Opinion and Political Change: Israel and the Intifada.” Comparative Politics24 (April): 317–34.
4.
Associated Press. 2011. “Palestinians to Seek UN Recognition for Independent State in September.” Haaretz.com, January 10. Accessed June 3, 2013.
5.
BarabasJasonJeritJennifer. 2010. “Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid?” American Political Science Review104 (May): 226–42.
6.
BaronReuben M.KennyDavid A.. 1986. “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (6): 1173–82.
7.
BeberBerndRoesslerPhilipScaccoAlexandra L.. 2014. “Intergroup Violence and Political Attitudes: Evidence from a Dividing Sudan.” Journal of Politics76 (July): 1–17.
8.
BerrebiClaudeKlorEsteban F.. 2008. “Are Voters Sensitive to Terrorism? Direct Evidence from the Israeli Electorate.” American Political Science Review102 (August): 279–301.
BruhnMiriamMcKenzieDavid. 2009. “In Pursuit of Balance: Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics1 (October): 200–32.
12.
ChapmanTerrence L.2007. “International Security Institutions, Domestic Politics, and Institutional Legitimacy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution51 (1): 134–66.
13.
ChapmanTerrence L.2009. “Audience Beliefs and International Organization Legitimacy.” International Organization63 (4): 733–64.
14.
ChapmanTerrence L.ReiterDan. 2004. “The United Nations Security Council and the Rally’ Round the Flag Effect.” Journal of Conflict Resolution48 (6): 886–909.
15.
ChapmanThomasRoederPhilip G.. 2007. “Partition as a Solution to Wars of Nationalism: The Importance of Institutions.” American Political Science Review101 (November): 677–91.
16.
CogginsBridget. 2011. “Friends in High Places: International Politics and the Emergence of States from Secessionism.” International Organization65 (3): 433–67.
17.
FabryMikulas. 2010. Recognizing States: International Society and the Establishment of New States since 1776. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
FearonJames D.1993. “Threats to Use Force: Costly Signals and Bargaining in International Relations.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
19.
GartzkeErik. 1998. “Kant We All Just Get Along? Opportunity, Willingness, and the Origins of the Democratic Peace.” American Journal of Political Science42 (1): 1–27.
20.
GelmanAndrewHillJennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GreenDonald P.HaShang E.BullockJohn G.. 2010. “Enough Already about ‘Black Box’ Experiments: Studying Mediation Is More Difficult than Most Scholars Suppose.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science628 (1): 200–8.
22.
GreeneWilliam H.2003. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
HaniehAkram. 2001. “The Camp David Papers.” Journal of Palestine Studies30 (2): 75–97.
25.
HassAmira. 2011. “More up Our Sleeves.” Haaretz.com, May 16. Accessed June 6, 2013.
26.
HurdIan. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization53 (2): 379–408.
27.
HuthPaul K.CrocoSarah E.AppelBenjamin J.. 2013. “Bringing Law to the Table: Legal Claims, Focal Points, and the Settlement of Territorial Disputes since 1945.” American Journal of Political Science57 (January): 90–103.
28.
ImaiK.KeeleL.TingleyD.YamamotoT.. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review105 (4): 765–89.
29.
KhouryJack. 2014. “PA Will Stop UN Application If Prisoners Are Released, Officials Say.” Haaretz.com, April 2. Accessed May 9, 2015.
30.
KrasnerStephen D.1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
LustickIan. 1993. Unsettled States, Disputed Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the West Bank–Gaza. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
Ma’an News Agency. 2012. “Hamas, Jihad Leaders Welcome UN Recognition of Palestine.” Ma’an News Agency, November 30, 2012. Accessed November 3, 2014. http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=543634.
33.
NachtweyJodiTesslerMark. 2002. “The Political Economy of Attitudes toward Peace among Palestinians and Israelis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (April): 260–85.
34.
NakhoulSamia. 2012. “Mashaal: UN Recognition, Gaza Conflict Go Together.” Ma’an News Agency, November 30, 2012. Accessed November 3, 2014. http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=543572.
35.
NederhofAnton J.1985. “Methods of Coping with Social Desirability Bias: A Review.” European Journal of Social Psychology15 (3): 263–80.
36.
O’LearyBrendanLustickIan S.CallaghyThomas, eds. 2001. Rightsizing the State: The Politics of Moving Borders. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
PowellRobert. 1996. “Bargaining in the Shadow of Power.” Games and Economic Behavior15 (August): 255–89.
38.
PowellRobert. 2002. “Bargaining Theory and International Conflict.” Annual Review of Political Science5:1–30.
39.
RudorenJodi. 2014. “Standoff over Prisoner Release Threatens Mideast Talks.” New York Times, March 24, 2014. A4.
40.
RudorenJodiGordonMichael R.LandlerMark. 2014. “Abbas Takes Defiant Step, and Mideast Talks Falter.” New York Times, April 2, 2014. A1.
41.
SambanisNicholasSchulhofer-WohlJonah. 2009. “What’s in a Line? Is Partition a Solution to Civil War?” International Security34 (Fall): 82–118.
42.
SchellingThomas C.1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
ShamirJacobShikakiKhalil. 2002. “Determinants of Reconciliation and Compromise among Israelis and Palestinians.” Journal of Peace Research39 (2): 185–202.
44.
ShamirJacobShikakiKhalil. 2010. Palestinian and Israeli Public Opinion: The Public Imperative in the Second Intifada. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
45.
ShelefNadav G.2010. Evolving Nationalism: Homeland, Identity, and Religion in Israel, 1925–2005. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
46.
ShelefNadav G. 2015. “Unequal Ground: Homelands and Conflict.” International Organization. Available on CJO2015. doi:10.1017/S0020818315000193.
47.
ShikakiKhalil. 2006. “Willing to Compromise: Palestinian Public Opinion and the Peace Process.” USIP Special Report158 (January): 1–16.
48.
SignorinoCurtis S.RitterJeffrey M.. 1999. “Tau-b or Not Tau-b: Measuring the Similarity of Foreign Policy Positions.” International Studies Quarterly43 (1): 115–44.
TelhamiShibley. 2001. “The Road to Palestinian Sovereignty: Problematic Structures or Conventional Obstacles?” In Problematic Sovereignty: Contested Rules and Political Possibilities, edited by KrasnerStephen D., 301-22. New York: Columbia University Press.
51.
ThompsonAlexander. 2006. “Coercion through IOs: The Security Council and the Logic of Information Transmission.” International Organization60 (1): 1–34.
52.
UN General Assembly, 67th session. 2012. “Status of Palestine in the United Nations.” A/67/L.28. November 26.
VoetenErik. 2000. “Clashes in the Assembly.” International Organization54 (2): 185–215.
55.
VoetenErik. 2005. “The Political Origins of the UN Security Council’s Ability to Legitimize the Use of Force.” International Organization59 (3): 527–57.
56.
WalterBarbara F.2002. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
WittmanDonald. 1979. “How a War Ends: A Rational Model Approach.” Journal of Conflict Resolution23 (December): 743–63.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
