In this article, we investigate how threat perceptions and emotions can jointly impact individuals’ attitudes toward drone strikes. We argue that conditions of threat can increase public support for the use of drone strikes. We further contend that the effect of threat perceptions on support for drone strikes is mediated by negative, emotional reactions, particularly anger. We test our arguments in France, the United States, and Turkey using data generated from nationally representative online surveys, in which individuals were randomly assigned to a control group, a condition in which they read about terrorist threat (with or without a reminder of democratic values), or a condition in which they read about economic threats. Our findings have implications for long-standing notions about the roles of rational calculations and psychological processes in influencing support for aggressive foreign policy.
BaronReuben M.KennyDavid A.. 1986. “The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51:1173–182.
2.
BaumMatthewGroelingTimothy J.. 2009. War Stories: The Causes and Consequences of Public Views of War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BerinskyAdam J.2009. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BoyleMichael J.2013. “The Costs and Consequences of Drone Warfare.” International Affairs89 (1): 1–29.
BrooksClemManzaJeff. 2013. Whose Rights? Counterterrorism and the Dark Side of American Public Opinion. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
CallaghanKarenSchnellFrauke. 2001. “Assessing the Democratic Debate: How the News Media Frame Elite Policy Discourse.” Political Communication18:183–212.
8.
DavisDarren W.2007. Negative Liberty: Public Opinion and the Terrorist Attacks on America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
EichenbergRichard C.2005. “Victory Has Many Friends: U.S. Public Opinion and the Use of Military Force.” International Security30 (1): 140–77.
10.
EntmanRobert M.2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
FairC. ChristineKaltenthalerKarlMillerWilliam J.. 2014. “Pakistani Opposition to American Drone Strikes.” Political Science Quarterly129 (1): 1–33.
12.
FiskKerstinRamosJennifer M., eds. 2016. Preventive Force: Drones, Targeted Killing and the Transformation of Contemporary Warfare. New York: NYU Press.
13.
GadarianShana K.2010. “The Politics of Threat: How Terrorism News Shapes Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Politics72 (2): 469–83.
14.
GartnerScott S.2008. “The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach.” American Political Science Review102 (01): 95–106.
15.
GelpiChristopherFeaverPeter D.ReiflerJason. 2009. Paying the Human Costs of War: American Public Opinion and Casualties in Military Conflicts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
HolstiOle R. 2004. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
17.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanleyCasseseErin. 2007. “On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger.” In The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, edited byRussell NeumanW.MarcusGeorge E.CriglerAnnMacKuenMichael, eds. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 202–30.
18.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanleyTaberCharlesLahavGallya. 2005. “Threat, Anxiety, and Support of Antiterrorism Policies.” American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 593–608.
19.
ImaiKosukeKeeleLukeTingleyDustinYamamotoTeppei. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review105 (4): 765–89.
20.
KaagJohnKrepsSarah. 2013. “Drones and Democratic Peace.” Brown Journal of International Affairs19 (2): 97–109.
21.
KeltnerDacherEllsworthPhoebe C.EdwardsKari. 1993. “Beyond Simple Pessimism: Effects of Sadness and Anger on Social Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64: 740–52.
22.
KrepsSarah. 2014. “Flying Under the Radar: A Study of Public Attitudes towards Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.” Research & Politics1: 1–7.
23.
LandauMark J.SolomonSheldonGreenbergJeffCohenFlorettePyszczynskiTomArndtJamieMillerClaude H.OgilvieDaniel M.CookAlison. 2004. “Deliver Us from Evil: The Effects of Mortality Salience and Reminders of 9/11 on Support for President George W. Bush.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30 (9): 1136–150.
24.
LarsonEric V. 1996. Casualties and Consensus: The Historical Role of Casualties in Domestic Support for US Wars and Military Operations. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation, MR-726-RC.
25.
LazarusRichard S.1991. “Progress on a Cognitive-Motivational-Relational Theory of Emotion.” American Psychologist46 (8): 819–34.
26.
LernerJennifer S.GonzalezRoxana M.SmallDeborah A.FischhoffBaruch. 2003. “Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism: A National Field Experiment.” Psychological Science14 (2): 144–50.
27.
LernerJennifer S.KeltnerDacher. 2000. “Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion-specific Influences on Judgement and Choice.” Cognition and Emotion14 (4): 473–93.
28.
LernerJennifer S.KeltnerDacher. 2001. “Fear, Anger, and Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81: 146–59.
29.
LernerJennifer S.TiedensLarissa. 2006. “Portrait of an Angry Decision Maker: How Appraisal Tendencies Shape Anger’s Influence on Cognition.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making19: 115–37.
MarcusGeorge E.MacKuenMichaelWolakJenniferKeeleLuke. 2006. “The Measure and Mismeasure of Emotion.” In Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing, edited byRedlawskDavid. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 31–46.
32.
MarcusGeorge E.SullivanJohn L.Theiss-MorseElizabethWoodSandra L.. 1995. With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
PyszczynskiThomas A.SolomonSheldonGreenbergJeff. 2002. In the Wake of 9/11: The Psychology of Terror. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41.
SmallDeborah A.LernerJennifer S.FischhoffBaruch. 2006. “Emotion Priming and Attributions for Terrorism: Americans’ Reactions in a National Field Experiment.” Political Psychology27 (2): 289–98.
42.
WalshJames Igoe. 2015. “Precision Weapons, Civilians Casualties, and Support for the Use of Force.” Political Psychology36 (5): 507–23.
43.
WilliamsBrian Glyn. 2010. “The CIA’s Covert Predator Drone War in Pakistan, 2004–2010: The History of an Assassination Campaign.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism33 (10): 871–92.
44.
WittkopfEugene R.1990. Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
45.
ZallerJohn R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
