Does the form of a multilateral agreement (MEA) by itself improve environmental performance? In particular, do legally nonbinding MEAs pose a rival to the effect of more traditional legally binding international agreements? Our theory builds on the legal and international regimes literatures and postulates that legally binding agreements (LBAs) have more benign effects on water quality than legally nonbinding agreements (LNBAs). We probe two operationalizations of the form of MEAs. First, we purely focus on the form: of legally binding versus legally nonbindings. Second, we combine the form of an agreement each with an index of precision and an index of delegation. The empirical focus is on upstream–downstream water quality in Europe during 1990 to 2007. Our regression analyses, regardless of specification, find that LBAs beat LNBAs and that LBAs with high degrees of precision and delegation beat the effect of any other configuration of agreements with respect to enhancing water quality.
AbbottKenneth W.KeohaneRobert O.MoravcsikAndrewSlaughterAnne-MarieSnidalDuncan. 2000. “The Concept of Legalization.” International Organization54 (3): 401–19.
2.
AbbottKenneth W.SnidalDuncan. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization54 (3): 421–56.
3.
AntweilerWernerCopelandBrain R.Scott TaylorM.. 2001. “Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?” American Economic Review91 (4): 877–908.
4.
AustAnthony. 1986. “The Theory and Practice of Informal International Instruments.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly35 (4): 787–812.
5.
AvramiLydiaSprinzDetlef F.. 2019. “Measuring and Explaining the EU’s Effect on National Climate Performance.” Environmental Politics28 (5): 822–846. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2018.1494945
6.
BernauerThomasBöhmeltTobiasKoubiVally. 2013. “Is There a Democracy–Civil Society Paradox in Global Environmental Governance?” Global Environmental Politics13 (1): 88–107.
7.
BernauerThomasKalbhennAnna. 2010. “The Politics of International Freshwater Resources.” In International Studies Encyclopedia Online, edited by DenemarkR. A., 5800–21. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.
8.
BernauerThomasKalbhennAnnaKoubiVallySpilkerGabriele. 2013. “Is There a “Depth Versus Participation” Dilemma in International Cooperation?” The Review of International Organizations8 (4): 477–97.
9.
BernauerThomasKuhnPatrick M.. 2010. “Is There an Environmental Version of the Kantian Peace? Insights from Water Pollution in Europe.” European Journal of International Relations16 (1): 77–102.
10.
BernauerThomasMoserPeter. 1996. “Reducing Pollution of the Rhine River: The Influence of International Cooperation.” Journal of Environment and Development5 (4): 391–417.
11.
BodanskyDaniel. 2010. The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BöhmeltTobiasPilsterUlrich H.. 2010. “International Environmental Regimes: Legalisation, Flexibility and Effectiveness.” Australian Journal of Political Science45 (2): 245–60.
13.
BowieG. L.MillsW. B.PorcellaD. B.CampbellC. L.PagenkopfJ. R.. 1985. Rates, Constants, and Kinetics Formulations in Surface Water Quality Modelling. Athens, GA: US EPA.
14.
BreitmeierHelmutUnderdalArildYoungOran R.. 2011. “The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Comparing and Contrasting Findings from Quantitative Research.” International Studies Review4 (13): 579–605.
15.
BreitmeierHelmutYoungOran R.ZürnMichael. 2006. Analyzing International Environmental Regimes. From Case Study to Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
Brown WeissEdith. 2007. “Conclusions: Understanding Compliance with Soft Law.” In Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System, edited by SheltonDinah, 535–53. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
ChayesAbramChayesAntonia Handler. 1993. “On Compliance.” International Organization47 (2): 175.
18.
ConcaKen. 2006. Governing Water: Contentious Transnational Politics and Global Institution Building, Global Environmental Accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
DownsGeorge W.RockeDavidBarsoomPeter N.. 1996. “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?” International Organization50 (3): 379–406.
20.
EastonDavid. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
21.
European Environment Agency. 2009. EEA Core Set Indicator on Oxygen Consuming Substances in Rivers (Csi 019). Copenhagen.
22.
European Environment Agency. 2010. Waterbase Rivers. Version 10. Quality Control Documentation. Copenhagen.
23.
FischhendlerItay. 2008. “When Ambiguity in Treaty Design Becomes Destructive: A Study of Transboundary Water.” Global Environmental Politics8 (1): 111–36.
24.
FrankelJeffrey A.RoseAndrew K.. 2005. “Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting out the Causality.” Review of Economics and Statistics87 (1): 85–91.
25.
GoldsteinJudith L.RiversDouglasTomzMichael. 2007. “Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade.” International Organization61 (1): 37–67.
26.
Gurtner-ZimmermannArnold. 1998. “The Effectiveness of the Rhine Action Program. Methodology and Results of an Evaluation of the Impacts of International Cooperation.” International Environmental Affairs10 (1): 241–67.
27.
GuzmanAndrew T.2005. “The Design of International Agreements.” European Journal of International Law16 (4): 579–612.
28.
HoltrupPetra. 1999. “Der Schutz Grenzüberschreitender Flüsse in Europa - Zur Effektivität Internationaler Umweltregime.” Dissertation no. 3642, Berichte des Forschungszentrums Jülich, Jülich.
29.
JacobsonHarold K.WeissEdith Brown. 1998. “Assessing the Record and Designing Strategies to Engage Countries.” In Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords, edited by WeissEdith BrownJacobsonHarold K., 511–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
KöppelMartin. 2009a. Does Regime Design Matter? Analyzing Success and Failure of International Cooperation. Munich: AVM.
31.
KöppelMartin. 2009b. “The Effectiveness of Soft Law: First Insights from Comparing Legally Binding Agreements with Flexible Action Programs.” Georgetown International Environmental Law Review21 (4): 821–35.
32.
KöppelMartin. 2012. Explaining the Effectiveness of Binding and Non-binding Agreements. Lessons from Transboundary Water Quality in Europe’s River Basins. Unpublished dissertation, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen.
33.
KöppelMartin. 2014. “Nonbinding Agreements as an Effective Alternative? A First Assessment of Transboundary River Pollution in Europe.” International Journal of Water8 (1): 1–16.
34.
KrasnerStephen D.1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
LipsonCharles. 1991. “Why Are Some International Agreements Informal?” International Organization45 (4): 495–538.
36.
MeybeckM.ChapmanDeborah V.HelmerRichard. 1990. Global Freshwater Quality: A First Assessment. Cambridge, MA: Published on Behalf of the World Health Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme by Blackwell Reference.
37.
MilesEdward L.UnderdalArildAndresenSteinarWettestadJørgenSkjaersethJon BirgerCarlinElaine M.. 2002. Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
MitchellRonald B.2003. “International Environmental Agreements: A Survey of Their Features, Formation, and Effects.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources28:429–61.
39.
MitchellRonald B.2007. “Compliance Theory: Compliance, Effectiveness, and Behavior Change in International Environmental Law.” In Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, edited by BrunneeJuttaBodanskyDanielHeyEllen, 893–921. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
MitchellRonald B.2010. International Politics and the Environment. 1st ed, Sage Series on the Foundations of International Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
MitchellRonaldDeaneGlenn D.. 2008. “Comparing Institutional Influence: The Relative Effectiveness of Three Environmental Agreements.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Bridging Multiple Divides, San Francisco, Mar 26-29.
42.
MitchellRonald B.KeilbachPatricia. 2001. “Reciprocity, Coercion, or Exchange: Symmetry, Asymmetry and Power in Institutional Design.” International Organization55 (4): 891–917.
43.
NeumayerEric. 2003. “Are Left-wing Party Strength and Corporatism Good for the Environment? Evidence from Panel Analysis of Air Pollution in OECD Countries.” Ecological Economics45 (2): 203–20.
44.
PovitkinaMarina. 2018. “The Limits of Democracy in Tackling Climate Change.” Environmental Politics27 (3): 411–32.
45.
PrinsGwynRaynerSteve. 2007. “Time to Ditch Kyoto.” Nature449 (7165): 973–75.
46.
RaustialaKal. 2005. “Form and Substance in International Agreements.” The American Journal of International Law99 (3): 581–614.
47.
RingquistEvan J.KostadinovaTatiana. 2005. “Assessing the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements: The Case of the 1985 Helsinki Protocol.” American Journal of Political Science49 (1): 86–102.
48.
RobertsJ. TimmonsParksBradley C.VásquezAlexis A.. 2004. “Who Ratifies Environmental Treaties and Why? Institutionalism, Structuralism and Participation by 192 Nations in 22 Treaties.” Global Environmental Politics4 (3): 22–65.
49.
SalaméLénaZaagPieter Van der. 2010. “Enhanced Knowledge and Education Systems for Strengthening the Capacity of Transboundary Water Management.” In Transboundary Water Management: Principles and Practice, edited by EarleAntonJägerskogAndersÖjendalJoakim, 171–86. Washington, DC: Earthscan.
50.
SigmanHilary. 2004. “Does Trade Promote Environmental Coordination? Pollution in International Rivers.” Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy3 (2): Article 2.
51.
SimmonsBeth. 2010. “Treaty Compliance and Violation.” Annual Review of Political Science13 (1): 273–96.
52.
SkjærsethJon BirgerStokkeOlav SchramWettestadJørgen. 2006. “Soft Law, Hard Law, and Effective Implementation of International Environmental Norms.” Global Environmental Politics6 (3): 118–19.
53.
Social Learning Group. 2001a. Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks. A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54.
Social Learning Group. 2001b. Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks. A Functional Analysis of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
SpilkerGabrieleKoubiVally. 2016. “The Effects of Treaty Legality and Domestic Institutional Hurdles on Environmental Treaty Ratification.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics16 (2): 223–38.
56.
SprinzDetlefVaahtorantaTapani. 1994. “The Interest-based Explanation of International Environmental Policy.” International Organization48 (1): 77–105.
57.
StinnettDouglas M.TirJaroslav. 2009. “The Institutionalization of River Treaties.” International Negotiation14:229–51.
58.
ThürerDaniel. 2000. “Soft Law.” In Encyclopedia of Public International Law, edited by BernhardtR., 452–60. New York: Elsevier.
59.
TirJaroslavStinnettDouglas M.. 2012. “Weathering Climate Change: Can Institutions Mitigate International Water Conflict?” Journal of Peace Research49 (1): 211–25.
60.
TschanzR.2001. “Gewässerschutz Am Rhein: Zur Lösung Von Grenzüberschreitenden Umweltschutzproblemen [Rhine Water Protection: Solving Transboundary Environmental Problems].” MA thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Center for International Studies, Zurich.
61.
United Nations. 1969. “Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.” opened for signature May 23, 1969. United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, Regis. No. 18,232, UN Doc. A/CONF.39/27.
62.
United Nations Environment Programme. 2002. Atlas of International Freshwater Agreements. Nairobi: United Nations Organization.
63.
UnderdalArild. 2002. “One Question, Two Answers.” In Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence, edited by MilesEdward L.UnderdalArildAndresenSteinarWettestadJørgenSkjærsethJon BirgerCarlinElaine M., 3–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
VictorDavid G.RaustialaKalSkolnikoffEugene B.. 1998. The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; MIT Press.
65.
Von SteinJana. 2005. “Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance.” American Political Science Review99 (4): 611–22.
66.
Von SteinJana. 2008. “The International Law and Politics of Climate Change.” Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (2): 243–68.
67.
VörösmartyC. J.McIntyreP. B.GessnerM. O.DudgeonD.PrusevichA.GreenP.GliddenS.BunnS. E.SullivanC. A.LiermannC. R.. 2010. “Global Threats to Human Water Security and River Biodiversity.” Nature467 (7315): 555–61.
68.
WettestadJørgen. 1995. “Nuts and Bolts for Environmental Negotiators?” Designing Effective International Regimes: A Conceptual Framework. Oslo: Fridtjof Nansen Institutt.
69.
YoungOran R. 2004. “The Consequences of International Regimes.” In Regime Consequences. Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies, edited by UnderdalArildYoungOran, 3–24. London: Kluwer Academic.
70.
YoungOran R.2011. “Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Existing Knowledge, Cutting-edge Themes, and Research Strategies.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108 (50): 19853–60.
71.
YoungOran R.LevyMarc A.. 1999. “The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes.” In Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms, edited by YoungOran R., 1–32. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
