Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We use this article to introduce the Militarized Interstate Confrontation (MIC) dataset, 1816-2014—a new dataset for international conflict with a host of innovative features. The MIC data corrects thousands of errors in existing interstate conflict data and provides fatality ranges for all conflicts, with meaningful fatality estimates and no missing fatality values. Thus, the MIC data fixes missing data problems that have precluded researchers from analyzing escalation and related issues because of the lack of integrated conflict and war data. We also identify and distribute separate datasets for state-versus-citizen actions that are protest-dependent. These are attacks on shipping, fishing boats, and rebels, which were previously included in the data because the sovereign of those private citizens protested. We discuss our systematic search for new conflict cases and the 108 new conflicts we found, and we provide analyses and summaries that demonstrate the usefulness of our MIC data. Finally, we use our new data to create the first ever dataset of truly dyadic, directed dyad-year data, with highest actions and fatalities that vary appropriately within conflicts by both year and dyad. We believe these datasets will be useful for a host of studies but especially those interested in how conflicts evolve over time.

Keywords

interstate conflict data sets conflict processes war peace

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bremer

Stuart A

. 1992. “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816-1965.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (2): 309-341.

Clodfelter

Micheal

. 2008. Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Encyclopedia of Casualty and Other Figures, 1494-2007. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

Ghosn

Faten

Palmer

Glenn

Bremer

Stuart A

. 2004. “The MID3 Data Set, 1993–2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 (2): 133-154.

Gibler

Douglas M

. 2017. “What They Fight for: Specific Territorial Issues in Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–2001.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 34 (2): 194-211.

Gibler

Douglas M

Little

Erin K

. 2017. “Heterogeneity in the Militarized Interstate Disputes (MIDs), 1816–2001: What Fatal MIDs Cannot Fix.” Political Science Research and Methods 5 (1): 189-199.

Gibler

Douglas M.

Miller

Steven V.

. N.d. “Our Perspective: Thousands of Errors Remain in the MID Data.” Posted response to CoW authors’ rejoinder in ISQ, available at.

Gibler

Douglas M

Miller

Steven V

Little

Erin K

. 2016. “An Analysis of the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) Dataset, 1816–2001.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (4): 719-730.

Gibler

Douglas M

Miller

Steven V

Little

Erin K

. 2020. “The Importance of Correct Measurement: A Response to Palmer, et al.” International Studies Quarterly 64: 476-479.

Gochman

Charles S

Maoz

Zeev

. 1984. “Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, Patterns, and Insights.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 28 (4): 585-616.

10.

Hensel

Paul R

. 2013. “General Coding Manual: Issue Correlates of War (ICOW) Project.” University of North Texas.

11.

Huth

Paul K

Allee

Todd L

. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Vol. 82. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Jones

Daniel M

Bremer

Stuart A

Singer

J David

. 1996. “Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (2): 163-213.

13.

Maoz

Zeev

Johnson

Paul L

Kaplan

Jasper

Ogunkoya

Fiona

Shreve

Aaron P

. 2019. “The Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes (MIDs) Dataset Version 3.0: Logic, Characteristics, and Comparisons to Alternative Datasets.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (3): 811-835.

14.

Palmer

Glenn

d’Orazio

Vito

Kenwick

Michael

Lane

Matthew

. 2015. “The MID4 Dataset, 2002–2010: Procedures, Coding Rules and Description.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 32 (2): 222-242.

15.

Palmer

Glenn

D’Orazio

Vito

Kenwick

Michael R

McManus

Roseanne W

. 2019. “Updating the Militarized Interstate Dispute Data: A Response to Gibler, Miller, and Little.” International Studies Quarterly 64: 469-475.

16.

Palmer

Glenn

D’Orazio

Vito

Kenwick

Michael R

McManus

Roseanne W

. 2020. “The Militarized Interstate Dispute Dataset: Putting Things in Perspective.” International Studies Quarterly 64: 480-481.

17.

Reiter

Dan

Allan

C Stam

Horowitz

Michael C

. 2016. “A Revised Look at Interstate Wars, 1816–2007.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 60 (5): 956-976.

18.

Sarkees

Meredith Reid

Wayman

Frank

. 2010. Resort to War: 1816-2007. Correlates of War. Washington DC: CQ Press.

19.

Singer

Joel David

Small

Melvin

. 1972. The Wages of War, 1816-1965: A Statistical Handbook. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

20.

Small

Melvin

Singer

J David

. 1970. “Patterns in International Warfare, 1816-1965.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 391 (1): 145-155.

21.

Thompson

William

Dreyer

David

. 2011. Handbook of International Rivalries. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.19 MB

0.00 MB