Tilted implants have been proposed as an alternative to traditional protocols in the rehabilitation of edentulous maxillae. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the outcomes of upright and tilted implants supporting full-arch fixed dentures for the immediate rehabilitation of edentulous maxillae, after at least 1 year of function. An electronic search of databases and a hand search of relevant journals in oral implantology were performed according to PRISMA guidelines through August, 2011. The literature search yielded 1,069 articles. Eleven articles were available for analysis. A total of 1,623 implants (778 tilted, 845 upright) were inserted into the maxillae of 324 patients. Seventeen tilted (2.19%) and 16 upright implants (1.89%) failed during the first year. No significant difference in failure rate was found between tilted and upright implants (p value = 0.52). Marginal bone level results were obtained from 6 studies. A non-significant mean difference between tilted and upright implants was found with regard to bone loss. Tilted implants demonstrated a favorable short-term prognosis in full-arch immediate loading rehabilitations of the maxillae. Randomized long-term trials are needed to better elucidate long-term success of tilted vs. upright-positioned implants.
AgliardiELFrancettiLRomeoSTaschieriSDel FabbroM (2008). Immediate loading in the fully edentulous maxilla without bone grafting: the V-II-V technique. Minerva Stomatol57:251-263.
2.
AgliardiEFrancettiLRomeoSTaschieriSDel FabbroM (2009). Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: preliminary results of a single cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants24:887-895.
3.
AgliardiEPanigattiSClericòMVillaCMalòP (2010). Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous jaw with full fixed prostheses supported by four implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res21:459-465.
4.
AlvesCCCorreiaARNevesM (2010). Immediate implants and immediate loading in periodontally compromised patients – a 3-year prospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent30:447-455.
5.
AnnibaliSCristalliMPDell’AquilaDBignozziILa MonacaGPilloniA (2012). Short dental implants: a systematic review. J Dent Res91:25-32.
6.
AparicioCPeralesPRangertB (2001). Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res3:39-49.
7.
AparicioCArévaloXOuazzaniWGranadosC (2002). A retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of tilted implants used in the treatment of the severely resorbed edentulous maxilla. Appl Osseoint Res1:17-21.
8.
BahatO (1992). Osseointegrated implants in the maxillary tuberosity: report on 45 consecutive patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants7:459-467.
9.
BalshiTJWolfingerGJBalshiSF (1999). Analysis of 356 pterygo-maxillary implants in edentulous arches for fixed prosthesis anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants14:398-406.
10.
BedrossianESullivanRMFortinYMalòPIndresanoT (2008). Fixed-prosthetic implant restoration of the edentulous maxilla: a systematic pretreatment evaluation method. J Oral Maxillofac Surg66:112-122.
11.
BergkvistGNilnerKSahlholmSKarlssonULindhC (2009). Immediate loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla: use of an interim fixed prosthesis followed by a permanent fixed prosthesis: a 32-month prospective radiological and clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res11:1-10.
12.
BevilacquaMTealdoTMeniniMPeraFMossolovADragoC. (2011). The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implant-supported fixed dentures. J Prosthet Dent105:5-13.
13.
BrånemarkPIGröndahlKOhrnellLONilsonPPetrusonBSvensonB. (2004). Zygoma fixture in the management of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: technique and long-term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg38:70-85.
14.
CalandrielloRTomatisM (2005). Simplified treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla via immediate/early function and tilted implants: a prospective 1-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res7(Suppl 1):1-12.
15.
CapelliMZuffettiFDel FabbroMTestoriT (2007). Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: a multicenter clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants22:639-644.
16.
CollaertBDe BruynH (2008). Immediate functional loading of TiO blast dental implants in full-arch edentulous maxillae: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res19:1254-1260.
17.
CorbellaSDel FabbroMTaschieriSDe SienaFFrancettiL (2011). Clinical evaluation of an implant maintenance protocol for the prevention of peri-implant diseases in patients treated with immediately loaded full-arch rehabilitations. Int J Dent Hygiene9:216-222.
18.
DegidiMPiattelliAFelicePCarinciF (2005). Immediate functional loading of edentulous maxilla: a 5-year retrospective study of 388 titanium implants. J Periodontol76:1016–1024.
19.
DegidiMPiattelliAIezziGCarinciF (2007). Immediately loaded short implants: analysis of a case series of 133 implants. Quintessence Int38:193-201.
20.
DegidiMNardiDPiattelliA (2010a). Immediate loading of the edentulous maxilla with a definitive restoration supported by an intraorally welded titanium bar and tilted implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants25:1175-1182.
21.
DegidiMNardiDPiattelliA (2010b). Immediate definitive rehabilitation of the edentulous patient using an intraorally welded titanium framework: a 3-year prospective study. Quintessence Int41:651-659.
22.
Del FabbroMBelliniCMRomeoDFrancettiL (2010). Tilted implants for the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res [Epub ahead of print May 13, 2010] (in press).
23.
FortinYSullivanRRangertBR (2002). The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation of the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res4:69-77.
24.
FrancettiLRomeoDCorbellaSTaschieriSDel FabbroM (2010). Bone level changes around axial and tilted implants in full-arch fixed immediate restorations. Interim results of a prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res [Epub ahead of print October 26, 2010] (in press).
25.
FranchiniICapelliMFumagalliLParentiATestoriT (2011). Multicenter retrospective analysis of 201 consecutively placed Camlog dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent31:255-263.
26.
HigginsJPThompsonSG (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med21:1539-1558.
27.
HinzeMThalmairTBolzWWachtelH (2010). Immediate loading of fixed provisional prostheses using four implants for the rehabilitation of the edentulous arch: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants25:1011-1018.
28.
IbañezJCTahhanMJZamarJAMenendezABJuanedaAMZamarNJ. (2005). Immediate occlusal loading of double acid-etched surface titanium implants in 41 consecutive full-arch cases in the mandible and maxilla: 6- to 74-month results. J Periodontol76:1972-1981.
29.
KawasakiTKomatsuKTsuchiyaR (2011). Tilted placement of tapered implants using a modified surgical template. J Oral Maxillofac Surg69:1642-1650.
30.
KoutouzisTWennströmJL (2007). Bone level changes at axial- and non-axial-positioned implants supporting fixed partial dentures. A 5-year retrospective longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res18:585-590.
31.
KrekmanovL (2000) Placement of posterio mandibular and maxillary implants in patients with severe bone deficiency: a clinical report of procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants15:722-730.
32.
KrekmanovLKahnMRangertBLindstromH (2000). Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants15:405-414.
33.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJMulrowCGøtzschePCIoannidisJP. (2009). Research methods and reporting. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of studies that evaluate health-care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ339:b2700.
34.
MalóPRangertBNobreM (2005). All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Brånemark System® implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res7(Suppl 1):88S-94S.
35.
MalòPNobreMPeterssonUWigrenS (2006). A pilot study of complete edentulous rehabilitation with immediate function using a new implant design: case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res8:223-232.
36.
MalòPde Araujo NobreMLopesA (2007). The use of computer-guided flapless surgery and four implants placed in immediate function to support a fixed denture: preliminary results after a mean follow-up period of thirteen months. J Prosthet Dent97(6 Suppl):26S-34S; erratum in J Prosthet Dent 99:167, 2008.
37.
MattssonTKöndellPAGyntherGWFredholmUBolinA (1999). Implant treatment without bone grafting in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae. J Oral Maxillofac Surg57:281-287.
38.
MeloniSMDe RiuGPisanoMCattinaGTullioA (2010). Implant treatment software planning and guided flapless surgery with immediate provisional prosthesis delivery in the fully edentulous maxilla. A retrospective analysis of 15 consecutively treated patients. Eur J Implantol3:245-251.
39.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Methods of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol62:1006-1012.
40.
NedirRBischofMSzmukler-MonclerSBernardJPSamsonJ (2004). Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res15:520-528.
41.
PapaspyridakosPChenCJSinghMWeberHPGallucciGO (2012). Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res91:242-248.
42.
PomaresC (2009). A retrospective clinical study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the “all-on-four” or the “all-on-six” immediate function concept. Eur J Oral Implantol2:55-60.
43.
PomaresC (2010). A retrospective study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the “all-on-four” or the “all-on-six” immediate function concept using flapless computer-guided implant surgery. Eur J Oral Implantol3:155-163.
44.
TealdoTBevilacquaMPeraFMeniniMRaveraGPeraP (2008). Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12 month follow-up report. J Prosthet Dent99:351-360.
45.
TealdoTBevilacquaMMeniniMPeraFRaveraGDragoC. (2011). Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in edentulous maxillae: a 36 month prospective study. Int J Prosthodont24:294-302.
46.
TellemanGRaghoebarGMVissinkAden HartogLHuddleston SlaterJJMeijerHJ (2011). A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol38:667-676.
47.
TestoriTDel FabbroMCapelliMZuffettiFFrancettiLWeinsteinRL (2008). Immediate occlusal loading and tilted implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: 1-year interim results of a multicentre prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res19:227-232.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
