Quality of life is a valid patient-reported parameter that provides an assessment of treatment need or outcomes complementary to standard clinical measures. Such patient-reported assessments are particularly salient when examining chronic conditions with prolonged treatment trajectories, such as cleft lip and palate. This critical review identifies key questions related to ongoing research on the oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) in children with cleft and caregiver well-being. Details of the design and results from 2 longitudinal multicenter studies are presented. This article also provides an update on recent published reports regarding OHRQoL in individuals with cleft. Methodological issues in OHRQoL research are discussed, including condition-specific versus generic instruments, incorporating positive items in OHRQoL instruments, calculating minimally important differences in OHRQoL, implementing mixed methods design, and utilizing validated short assessment forms in OHRQoL research. Finally, new directions for research in cleft as a chronic condition are identified and discussed.
AinsworthMBostonMBowlbyJRosenbluthD.1956. The effects of mother-child separation: a follow-up study. Br J Med Psychol. 29(3–4):211–247.
2.
AlansariRBedosCAllisonP.2014. Living with cleft lip and palate: the treatment journey. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 51(2):222–229.
3.
AntonarakisGSPatelRNTompsonB.2013. Oral health–related quality of life in non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients: a systematic review. Community Dent Health. 30(3):189–195.
4.
AntounJSFowlerPVJackHCFarellaM.2015. Oral health–related quality of life changes in standard, cleft, and surgery patients after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 148(4):568–575.
5.
AravenaPCGonzalezTOyarzunTCoronadoC.2017. Oral health–related quality of life in children in chile treated for cleft lip and palate: a case-control approach. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 54(2):e15–e20.
6.
BakerSROwensJSternMWillmotD.2009. Coping strategies and social support in the family impact of cleft lip and palate and parents’ adjustment and psychological distress. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 46(3):229–236.
7.
BeluciMLGenaroKF. 2016. Quality of life of individuals with cleft lip and palate pre- and post-surgical correction of dentofacial deformity. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 50(2):217–223.
8.
BergerZEDaltonLJ. 2011. Coping with a cleft II: factors associated with psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 48(1):82–90.
9.
BroderHLCrerandCERuffRRPeshanskyASarwerDBSischoL.2017. Challenges in conducting multicentre, multidisciplinary, longitudinal studies in children with chronic conditions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 45(4):317–322.
10.
BroderHLFloresRLCloustonSKirschnerREGarfinkleJSSischoLPhillipsC.2016. Surgeon’s and caregivers’ appraisals of primary cleft lip treatment with and without nasoalveolar molding: a prospective multicenter pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 137(3):938–945.
11.
BroderHLWilson-GendersonM.2007. Reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP child’s version). Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 35 Suppl 1:20–31.
12.
BroderHLWilson-GendersonMSischoL.2012a. Health disparities among children with cleft. Am J Public Health. 102(5):828–830.
13.
BroderHLWilson-GendersonMSischoL.2012b. Reliability and validity testing for the Child Oral Health Impact Profile–reduced (COHIP-SF 19). J Public Health Dent. 72(4):302–312.
14.
BroderHLWilson-GendersonMSischoL.2014. Examination of a theoretical model for oral health–related quality of life among youths with cleft. Am J Public Health. 104(5):865–871.
15.
BroderHLWilson-GendersonMSischoL.2017. Oral health–related quality of life in youth receiving cleft-related surgery: self-report and proxy ratings. Qual Life Res. 26(4):859–867.
16.
BroderHLWilson-GendersonMSischoLNormanRG. 2014. Examining factors associated with oral health–related quality of life for youth with cleft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 133(6):828e–834e.
17.
BronfenbrennerU.1999. Environments in developmental perspective: theoretical and operational models. In: FriedmanSLWachsTD editors. Measuring environment across the life span: emerging methods and concepts. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association. p. 3–28.
18.
CampbellSB.1995. Behavior problems in preschool-children—a review of recent research. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 36(1):113–149.
19.
CochraneVMSladeP.1999. Appraisal and coping in adults with cleft lip: associations with well-being and social anxiety. Br J Med Psychol. 72(Pt 4):485–503.
20.
CrerandCERosenbergJMageeLSteinMBWilson-GendersonMBroderHL. 2015. Parent-reported family functioning among children with cleft lip/palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 52(6):651–659.
21.
CrerandCESarwerDBKazakAEClarkARumseyN.2017. Body image and quality of life in adolescents with craniofacial conditions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 54(1):2–12.
22.
DrotarD.1997. Relating parent and family functioning to the psychological adjustment of children with chronic health conditions: what have we learned? What do we need to know?J Pediatr Psychol. 22(2):149–165.
23.
EcksteinDAWuRLAkinbiyiTSilverLTaubPJ. 2011. Measuring quality of life in cleft lip and palate patients: currently available patient-reported outcomes measures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 128(5):518e–526e.
24.
EslamiNMajidiMRAliakbarianMHasanzadehN.2013. Oral health–related quality of life in children with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 24(4):e340–e343.
25.
FeilEGBaggettKMDavisBSheeberLLandrySCartaJJBuzhardtJ.2008. Expanding the reach of preventive interventions: development of an Internet-based training for parents of infants. Child Maltreat. 13(4):334–346.
26.
Hardin-JonesMChapmanKL. 2011. Cognitive and language issues associated with cleft lip and palate. Semin Speech Lang. 32(2):127–140.
27.
HathawayRRLongREJr.2014. Early cleft management: in search of evidence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 145(2):135–141.
28.
JaeschkeRSingerJGuyattGH. 1989. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 10(4):407–415.
29.
JokovicALockerDTompsonBGuyattG.2004. Questionnaire for measuring oral health–related quality of life in eight- to ten-year-old children. Pediatr Dent. 26(6):512–518.
30.
KlassenAFTsangarisEForrestCRWongKWPusicALCanoSJSyedIDuaMKainthSJohnsonJet al. 2012. Quality of life of children treated for cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 65(5):547–557.
31.
KonanPManosudprasitMPisekPPisekAWangsrimongkolT.2015. Oral health–related quality of life in children and young adolescent orthodontic cleft patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 98Suppl 7:S84–S91.
32.
KortelainenTTolvanenMLuotoAYlikontiolaLPSandorGKLahtiS.2016. Comparison of oral health–related quality of life among schoolchildren with and without cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 53(5):e172–e176.
33.
KramerFJGruberRFialkaFSinikovicBSchliephakeH.2008. Quality of life and family functioning in children with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts at preschool ages. J Craniofac Surg. 19(3):580–587.
34.
LeeGHMMcGrathCYiuCKYKingNM. 2010. A comparison of a generic and oral health–specific measure in assessing the impact of early childhood caries on quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 38(4):333–339.
35.
MasoodMMasoodYSaubRNewtonJT. 2014. Need of minimal important difference for oral health–related quality of life measures. J Public Health Dent. 74(1):13–20.
36.
MercadoARussellKHathawayRDaskalogiannakisJSadekHLongRECohenMSembGShawW.2011. The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 4. Nasolabial aesthetics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 48(3):259–264.
37.
PapiPGiardinoRSassanoPAmodeoGPompaGCasconeP.2015. Oral health related quality of life in cleft lip and palate patients rehabilitated with conventional prostheses or dental implants. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 5(6):482–487.
38.
PatelPARubinMSCloustonSLalezaradehFBrechtLECuttingCBShetyePRWarrenSMGraysonBH. 2015. Comparative study of early secondary nasal revisions and costs in patients with clefts treated with and without nasoalveolar molding. J Craniofac Surg. 26(4):1229–1233.
39.
PattersonJ.1988. Families experiencing stress: the family adjustment and adaptation response model. Family Systems Medicine. 5(2):202–237.
40.
Queiroz HerkrathAPHerkrathFJRebeloMAVettoreMV. 2015. Measurement of health-related and oral health–related quality of life among individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 52(2):157–172.
41.
RuffRRSischoLBroderHL. 2016a. Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 14(1):140.
42.
RuffRRSischoLBroderHL. 2016b. Resiliency and socioemotional functioning in youth receiving surgery for orofacial anomalies. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 44(4):371–380.
43.
RuffRRSischoLChinnCHBroderHL. 2017. Development and validation of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile–Preschool version. Community Dent Health. 34(3):176–182.
44.
RumseyNStockNM. 2013. Living with a cleft: psychological challenges, support and intervention. In: BerkowitzS, editor. Cleft lip and palate: diagnosis and management. 3rd ed.New York (NY): Springer. p. 907–916.
45.
ShawDW.2004. Global strategies to reduce the health care burden of craniofacial anomalies: report of WHO meetings on international collaborative research on craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 41(3):238–243.
46.
SischoLBroderHL. 2011. Oral health–related quality of life: what, why, how, and future implications. J Dent Res. 90(11):1264–1270.
47.
SischoLBroderHLPhillipsC.2015. Coping with cleft: a conceptual framework of caregiver responses to nasoalveolar molding. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 52(6):640–650.
48.
SischoLCloustonSPhillipsCBroderHL. 2015. Caregiver responses to early cleft palate care: a mixed method approach. Health Psychol. 35(5):474–482.
49.
SitzmanTJGirottoJAMarcusJR.2008. Current surgical practices in cleft care: unilateral cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 121(5):261e–270e.
50.
SladeGDReisineST. 2007. The Child Oral Health Impact Profile: current status and future directions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 35Suppl 1:50–53.
51.
SladeGDSpencerAJ. 1994. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 11(1):3–11.
52.
StelzleFRohdeMOetterNKrugKRiemannMAdlerWNeukamFWKnipferC.2017. Gingival esthetics and oral health–related quality of life in patients with cleft lip and palate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 46(8):993–999.
53.
StockNMFeragenKBRumseyN.2015. “It doesn’t all just stop at 18”: psychological adjustment and support needs of adults born with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 52(5):543–554.
54.
ThibodeauxAGDeatrickJA. 2007. Cultural influence on family management of children with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 24(4):227–233.
55.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Oral health in America: a report of the surgeon general. Rockville (MD): National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.
56.
WardJAVigKWFirestoneARMercadoAda FonsecaMJohnstonW.2013. Oral health–related quality of life in children with orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 50(2):174–181.
57.
World Health Organization. 1995. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 41(10):1403–1409.
58.
WilsonIBClearyPD. 1995. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 273(1):59–65.
59.
YatesTMMastenAS. 2004. Fostering the future: resilience theory and the practice of positive psychology. In: LinleyPAJosephS editors. Positive psychology in practice. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 521–539.
