If it is possible to overcome significant data challenges, social network analytics could be used to expose structural vulnerabilities in transnational drug smuggling operations, offering clear targets for crime control efforts that aim to disrupt transhipment. This study explores the extent to which data inclusion decisions might distort the emergent structure of nation-to-nation smuggling networks mapped with aggregate intelligence using United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) incident level seizure data (2010–2016). Bivariate exponential random graph models (ERGM) show that relaxing data inclusion standards exposes illicit backchannels (reciprocity) and a more complete picture of major transhipment activity (activity and popularity spread) than would be otherwise undetected. Relaxed data inclusion standards may help to adjust for the data limitations associated with the detection of rare events and inconsistent reporting practices, if usage rules are followed.
AzianiA.BerlusconiG.GiommoniL. (2021). A quantitative application of enterprise and social embeddedness theories to the transnational trafficking of cocaine in Europe. Deviant Behavior, 42(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1666606
2.
BelliR. (2012). Where political extremists and greedy criminals meet: A comparative study of financial crimes and criminal networks in the United States. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, BiblioGov.
3.
BichlerG. (2019). Understanding criminal networks: A research guide. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
FathurrohmanBichlerG. (2021). Explaining the positional importance of actors involved in trafficking methamphetamine into Indonesia. Global Crime, 22(2), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2020.1819249
5.
BichlerG.MalmA.CooperT. (2017). Drug supply networks: A systematic review of the organizational structure of illicit drug trade. Crime Science, 6, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-017-0063-3
6.
BoivinR. (2014a). Risks, prices, and positions: A social network analysis of illegal drug trafficking in the world-economy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(2), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.12.004
7.
BoivinR. (2014b). Macrosocial network analysis: The case of transnational drug trafficking. In MasysA. (Eds.), Networks and network analysis for defence and security. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04147-6_3
8.
BrightD.BrewerR.MorselliC. (2021). Using social network analysis to study crime: Navigating the challenges of criminal justice records. Social Networks, 66, 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.01.006
9.
BrightD. A.DelaneyJ. J. (2013). Evolution of a drug trafficking network: Mapping changes in network structure and function across time. Global Crime, 14(2-3), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2013.787927
10.
BrightD. A.GreenhillC.ReynoldsM.RitterA.MorselliC. (2014). The use of actor-level attributes and centrality measures to identify key actors: A case study of an Australian drug trafficking network. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(3), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986214553378
11.
BroséusJ.RhumorbarbeD.MorelatoM.StaehliL.RossyQ. (2017). A geographical analysis of trafficking on a popular darknet market. Forensic Science International, 277, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.05.021
12.
CalderoniF. (2012). The structure of drug trafficking mafias: The ‘Ndrangheta and cocaine. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 58(3), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-012-9387-9
13.
CalderoniF. (2015). Network analysis of organized crime meetings as a tool for the identification of leadership positions. In BichlerG.MalmA. (Eds.), Disrupting criminal networks: Network analysis in crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, (Vol. 28, pp. 89–110). Boulder, CO: First Forum Press.
14.
CampanaP.VareseF. (2012). Listening to the wire: Criteria and techniques for the quantitative analysis of phone intercepts. Trends in Organized Crime, 15(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-011-9131-3
15.
CaulkinsJ. P.BurnettH.LeslieE. (2009). How illegal drugs enter an island country: Insights from interviews with incarcerated smugglers. Global Crime10(1-2), 66–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440570902782477
Décary-HétuD.Paquet-CloustonM.AldridgeJ. (2016). Going international? Risk taking by cryptomarket drug vendors. International Journal of Drug Policy, 35, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.06.003
18.
DiviákT. (2019). Key aspects of covert networks data collection: Problems, challenges, and opportunities. Social Networks, 69, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.10.002
19.
DiviákT.DijkstraJ. K.SnijdersT. A. B. (2020). Poisonous connections: a case study on a Czech counterfeit alcohol distribution network. Global Crime, 21(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2019.1645653
20.
DuijnP. A. C.KashirinV.SlootP. M. A. (2014). The relative ineffectiveness of criminal network disruption. Scientific Reports, 4(4238), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04238
21.
DuxburyS. W.HaynieD. L. (2018) The network structure of opioid distribution on a darknet cryptomarket. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(4), 921–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9359-4
GiommoniL.BerlusconiG.AzianiA. (2021). Interdicting international drug trafficking: A Network approach for coordinated and targeted interventions. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09473-0
24.
GleditschN. P.WallensteenP.ErikssonM.SollenbergM.StrandH., (2002). Armed conflict 1946-2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 39(5), 615–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343302039005007
25.
GraifC.LungeanuA.YetterA., (2017). Neighborhood isolation in Chicago: Violent crime effects on increasing structural isolation and homophily in inter- neighborhood commuting networks. Social Networks, 51, 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.01.007
26.
KnokeD.YangS. (2008). Social networks analysis. (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, No. 154), (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
KoskinenJ. H.RobinsG. L.WangP.PattisonP. E. (2013). Bayesian analysis for partially observed network data, missing ties, attributes and actors. Social networks, 35(4), 514–527.
28.
KukhianidzeA. (2006). Smuggling through conflict zones in Georgia and security in the Caucasus. NATO Security through Science Series E, Human and Societal Dynamics, 10, 117.
29.
LewisK.PapachristosA. V. (2020). Rules of the game: Exponential random graph models of a gang homicide network. Social Forces, 98(4), 1829–1858. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz106
30.
LusherDKoskinenJRobinsG (2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks. In Theory, methods, and applications (35). Cambridge University Press.
31.
LusherDRobinsG (2013). Example exponential random graph model analysis. Exponential random graph models for social networks, 37–46.
32.
MalmA.BichlerG. (2011). Networks of collaborating criminals: Assessing the structural vulnerability of drug markets. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810391535
33.
MalmA.BichlerG.Van De WalleS. (2010). Comparing ties that bind criminal networks: Is blood thicker than water?Security Journal, 23(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2009.18
34.
MorselliC. (2001). Structuring Mr. Nice: Entrepreneurial opportunities and brokerage positioning in the cannabis trade. Crime, Law and Social Change, 35(3), 203–244. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011272411727
NorbutasL. (2018). Offline constraints in online drug marketplaces: An exploratory analysis of a cryptomarket trade network. International Journal of Drug Policy, 56, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.016
38.
OldenburgB.Van DuijnM.VeenstraR. (2018). Defending one’s friends, not one’s enemies: A social network analysis of children’s defending, friendship, and dislike relationships using XPNet. Plos One, 13(5), Article e0194323. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194323
39.
PetterssonT.DavisS.DenizA.EngströmG.HawachN.HögbladhS.SollenbergM.ÖbergM. (2021). Organized violence 1989-2020, with a special emphasis on Syria. Journal of Peace Research, 58(4), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433211026126
40.
RobinsG.PattisonP.KalishY.LusherD. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social networks, 29(2), 173–191.
WangP.RobinsG.PattisonP.KoskinenJ. (2009). PNet: Program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph models. Parkville: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne.
43.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
