Research suggests that self-determination skills are positively correlated with factors that have been shown to improve academic achievement, but the direct relationship among self-determination, self-concept, and academic achievement is not fully understood. This study offers an empirical explanation of how self-determination and self-concept affect academic achievement for adolescents with learning disabilities after taking into consideration the covariates of gender, income, and urbanicity. In a nationally representative sample (N = 560), the proposed model closely fit the data, with all proposed path coefficients being statistically significant. The results indicated that there were significant correlations among the three latent variables (i.e., self-determination, self-concept, and academic achievement), with self-determination being a potential predictor of academic achievement for students with learning disabilities.
AcostaE. S. (2001). The relationship between school climate, academic self-concept, and academic achievement. Tempe: Arizona State University.
2.
AgranM.SinclairT.AlperS.CavinM.WehmeyerM.HughesC. (2005). Using self-monitoring to increase following-direction skills of students with moderate to severe disabilities in general education. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40(1), 3–13.
3.
AhmedW.BruinsmaM. (2006). A structural model of self-concept, autonomous motivation and academic performance in cross-cultural perspective. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4(3), 551–576.
4.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote the self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 219–277.
5.
AllenS. K.SmithA. C.TestD. W.FlowersC.WoodW. M. (2001). The effects of self-directed IEP on student participation in IEP meetings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24(2), 107–120.
6.
ArndtS. A.KonradM.TestD. W. (2006). Effects of the self-directed IEP on student participation in planning meetings. Remedial and Special Education, 27(4), 194–207.
7.
BlackorbyJ.ChorostM.GarzaN.GuzmanA. (2004). The academic performance of elementary and middle school students with disabilities. In BlackorbyJ.WagnerM.CametoR.DaviesE.LevineP.NewmanL.MarderC.SumiC., with ChorostM.GarzaN.GuzmanA. (Eds.), Engagement, academics, social adjustment, and independence: The achievements of elementary and middle school students with disabilities (pp. 4.1–4.22). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
8.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.PiersonM. R.StangK. K. (2008). Promoting self-determination for transition-aged youth: Views of high school general and special educators. Exceptional Children, 75, 55–70.
9.
CavalloA. M. L.RozmanM.PotterW. H. (2004). Gender differences in learning constructs, shifts in learning constructs, and their relationship to course achievement in a structured inquiry, yearlong college physics course for life science. School Science and Mathematics, 104(6), 288–300.
10.
CobbB.LehmannJ.Newman-GoncharR.AlwellM. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 108–114.
11.
DayJ. C.NewburgerE. C. (2002). The big payoff: Educational attainment and synthetic estimates of work-life earnings (Current population reports). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau. Retrieved from http://landview.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/p23-210.pdf
12.
EzellD.KleinC. E.Ezell-PowellS. (1999). Empowering students with mental retardation through portfolio assessment: A tool for fostering self-determination skills. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 453–463.
13.
FieldS.HoffmanA. (2001). Teaching with integrity, reflection, and self-determination. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.
14.
FieldS.HoffmanA. (2007). Self-determination in secondary transition assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 181–190.
15.
FieldS.SarverM. D.ShawS. F. (2003). Self-determination: A key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 339–349.
16.
FowlerC. H.KonradM.WalkerA. R.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2007). Self-determination interventions’ effects on the academic performance of students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 270–285.
17.
FreemanC. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls and women: 2004. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
18.
FullertonA.CoyneP. (1999). Developing skills and concepts for self-determination in young adults with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14(1), 42–63.
19.
GoldbergR. J.HigginsE. L.RaskindM. H.HermanK. L. (2003). Predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: A qualitative analysis of a 20-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 222–236.
20.
GreeneJ. P. (2000). The cost of remedial education: How much Michigan pays when students fail to learn basic skills. Midland, MI: Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
21.
GreshamF. M. (1995). Student Self-Concept Scale: Description and relevance to students with emotional and behavioral disorder. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 3(1), 19–27.
22.
GrigalM.NeubertD. A.MoonM. S.GrahamS. (2003). Self-determination for students with disabilities: Views of parents and teachers. Exceptional Children, 70, 97–112.
23.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
HoffmanA.FieldS. (2005). Steps to self-determination (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
25.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
26.
Institute for Education Sciences. (2012). Restricted use data licenses. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/statprog/instruct.asp
27.
JohnsonD. R.ThurlowM. L.StoutK. E. (2007). Revisiting graduation requirements and diploma options for youth with disabilities: A national study (Tech. Rep. 49). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
28.
KonradM.FowlerC. H.WalkerA. R.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2007). Effects of self-determination interventions on the academic skills of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 30, 89–113.
29.
Kurtz-CostesB.RowleyS. J.Harris-BrittA.WoodsT. A. (2008). Gender stereotypes about mathematics and science and self-perceptions of ability in late childhood and early adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54, 386–409.
30.
KutnerM.GreenbergE.JinY.BoyleB.HsuY.DunleavyE. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/Pubs2007/2007480.pdf
31.
LachapelleY.WehmeyerM. L.HaelewyckM. C.CourboisY.KeithK. D.SchalockR.WalshP. N.(2005). The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: An international study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 740–744.
32.
LackayeT.MargalitM. (2006). Comparisons of achievement, effort and self-perceptions among students with learning disabilities and their peers from different achievement groups. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 432–446.
33.
LeeS. H.WehmeyerM. L.SoukupJ. H.PalmerS. B. (2010). Impact of curriculum modifications on access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76, 213–233.
34.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the questions, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.
35.
MadausJ. W. (2006a). Employment outcomes of university graduates with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 29, 19–31.
36.
MadausJ. W. (2006b). Improving the transition to career for college students with learning disabilities: Suggestions from graduates. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19, 85–93.
37.
MadausJ. W.GerberP. J.PriceL. A. (2008). Adults with learning disabilities in the workforce: Lessons for secondary transition programs. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 148–153.
38.
MarderC.LevineP.WagnerM. (2003). Demographic characteristics of youth with disabilities. In WagnerM.MarderC.LevineP.CametoR.CadwalladerT. W.BlackorbyJ., with CardosoD.NewmanL. (Eds.), The individual and household characteristics of youth with disabilities (pp. 2.1–2.8). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
39.
MartinJ. E.MithaugD. E.CoxP.PetersonL. Y.Van DyckeJ. L.CashM. E. (2003). Increasing self-determination: Teaching students to plan, work, evaluate, and adjust. Exceptional Children, 69, 431–448.
40.
MartinJ. E.Van DyckeJ. L.ChristensenW. R.GreeneB. A.GardnerJ. E.LovettD. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299–316.
41.
MartorellA.Gutierrez-RecachaP.PerdaA.Ayuso-MateosJ. L. (2008). Identification of personal factors that determine work outcome for adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 1091–1101.
42.
MasonC.FieldS.SwailowskyS. (2004). Implementation of self-determination activities and student participation in IEPs. Exceptional Children, 70, 441–451.
43.
MeeceJ. L.HermanP.McCombsB. L. (2003). Relations of learner-centered teaching practices to adolescents’ achievement goals. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 457–475.
44.
MeltzerL. J.ReddyR.PollicaL. S.RoditiB.SayerJ.TheokasC. (2004). Positive and negative self-perceptions: Is there a cyclical relationship between teachers’ and students’ perceptions of effort, strategy use, and academic performance?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 33–44.
45.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Table 110. Average student scale score in reading, by age and selected student and school characteristics: Selected years, 1971 to 2004. Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d04/tables/dt04_110.asp
46.
National Center for Secondary Education and Transition. (2004). A national leadership summit on improving results for youth: State priorities and needs for assistance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
47.
NewmanL. (2006). Facts from NLTS2: General education participation and academic performance of students with learning disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/fact_sheets/nlts2_fact_sheet_2006_07.pdf
48.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M.ShaverD. (2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
49.
NotaL.FerrariL.SoresiS.WehmeyerM. L. (2007). Self-determination, social abilities, and the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 850–865.
50.
O’NeillP. T. (2001). Special education and high stakes testing for high school graduation: An analysis of current law and policy. Journal of Law & Education, 30, 185–222.
51.
PiersonM. R.CarterE. W.LaneK. L.GlaeserB. C. (2008). Factors influencing the self-determination of transition-age youth with high-incidence disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 115–125.
52.
SanchezF. J.RodaM. D. (2003). Relationships between self-concept and academic achievement in primary students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology and Psychopedagogy, 1(1), 95–120.
53.
SebaldH. (2010). Student participation in extracurricular activities, self-concept, academic self-concept, self-determination, and health habits during the middle school year and their impact on academic achievement. New York, NY: Dowling College.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
56.
ShogrenK. A.LopezS. J.WehmeyerM. L.LittleT. D.PressgroveC. L. (2006). The role of positive psychology constructs in predicting life satisfaction in adolescents with and without cognitive disabilities: An exploratory study. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 37–52.
57.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT. D.GarnerN.LawrenceM. (2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73, 488–509.
58.
SkinnerA. L. (2003). Using locus of control to improve self-determination and outcomes for consumers with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 34(2), 27–32.
59.
SRI International. (2005, June). Facts from OSEP’s National Longitudinal Studies: The self-determination of youth with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
TestD. W.FowlerC.KohlerP.KorteringL. (2010). Evidence-based practices and predictors in secondary transition: What we know and what we still need to know. Charlotte, NC: National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
62.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL. J.KohlerP. H. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181.
63.
ThomaC. A.NathansonR.BakerS. R.TamuraR. (2002). Self-determination: What do special educators know and where do they learn it?Remedial and Special Education, 23, 242–247.
64.
ThomaC. A.PannozzoG. M.FrittonS. C.BartholomewC. C. (2008). A qualitative study of preservice teachers’ understanding of self-determination for students with significant disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 94–105.
65.
ValentineJ. C. (2001). The relation between self-concept and achievement: A meta-analytic review. Columbia: University of Missouri.
66.
WagnerM.CametoR.NewmanL. (2003). Youth with disabilities: A changing population. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
67.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2005). Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
68.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2006). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
69.
WehmeyerM. L. (1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale: Procedural guidelines. Washington, DC: Arc of the United States.
70.
WehmeyerM. L.AberyB. H.ZhangD.WardK.WillisD.HossainW. A.WalkerH. M. (2011). Personal self-determination and moderating variables that impact efforts to promote self-determination. Exceptionality, 19, 19–30.
71.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (2000). A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34, 58–68.
72.
WehmeyerM. L.FieldS.ThomaC. A. (2012). Self-determination and adolescent transition education. In WehmeyerM. L.WebbK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent transition education for youth with disabilities (pp. 171–190). New York, NY: Routledge.
73.
WehmeyerM. L.LittleT. D. (2009). Self-determination. In LopezS. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of positive psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 868–874). Boston, MA: Blackwell.
74.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
75.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.LeeY.Williams-DiehmK.ShogrenK. A. (2011). A randomized-trial evaluation of the effect of Whose Future is it Anyway? on self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 45–56.
76.
WehmeyerM. L.SchalockR. L. (2001). Self-determination and quality of life: Implications for special education services and supports. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(8), 1–16.
77.
WehmeyerM.SchwartzM. (1998). The relationship between self-determination and quality of life for adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33(1), 3–12.
78.
WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK.PalmerS.Williams-DiehmK.LittleT.BoultonA. (in press). Impact of the self-determined learning model of instruction on student self-determination: A randomized-trial placebo control group study. Exceptional Children.
79.
Williams-DiehmK.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS.SoukupJ. H.GarnerN. (2008). Self-determination and student involvement in transition planning: A multivariate analysis. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 14, 25–36.
80.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
