This article’s objective is to inspire and provide guidance on the development of marketing knowledge based on the theories-in-use (TIU) approach. The authors begin with a description of the TIU approach and compare it with other inductive and deductive research approaches. The benefits of engaging in TIU-based research are discussed, including the development of novel organic marketing theories and the opportunity to cocreate relevant marketing knowledge with practitioners. Next, they review criteria for selecting research questions that are particularly well-suited for examination with TIU-based research. This is followed by detailed suggestions for TIU research: focusing on developing new constructs, theoretical propositions (involving antecedents, moderators, and consequences), and arguments for justifying theoretical propositions. A discussion of TIU tradecraft skills, validity checks, and limitations follows. The authors close with a discussion of future theory-building opportunities using the TIU approach.
ArgyrisChris (2010), Reasoning and Rationalization: The Limits to Organizational Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
ArgyrisChrisSchonDonald (1974), Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. Oxford, UK: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BaxterJamieEylesJohn (1997), “Evaluating Qualitative Research in Social Geography: Establishing ‘Rigour’ in Interview Analysis,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22 (4), 505–25.
4.
ChallagallaGoutamMurthaBrian R.JaworskiBernard (2014), “Marketing Doctrine: A Principles-Based Approach to Guiding Marketing Decision Making in Firms,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (4), 4–20.
5.
ChaseKevin S.MurthaBrian (2019), “Selling to Barricaded Buyers,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (5), 2–20.
6.
ClarkTerryKeyThomas MartinHodisMonicaRajaratnamDaniel (2014), “The Intellectual Ecology of Mainstream Marketing Research: An Inquiry into the Place of Marketing in the Family of Business Disciplines,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42 (3), 223–41.
7.
CorbinJuliet M.StraussAnselm (2008), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8.
CroninJoseph J.JrTaylorSteven A. (1992), “Measuring Service Quality: A Re-Examination and Extension,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (3), 55–68.
9.
DenzinNorman K.LincolnYvonna S. (2000), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DzyaburaDariaHauserJohn R. (2019), “Recommending Products When Consumers Learn Their Preference Weights,” Marketing Science, 38 (3), 417–41.
12.
EisenhardtKathleen M.GraebnerMelissa E.SonensheinScott (2016), “Grand Challenges and Inductive Methods: Rigor Without Rigor Mortis,” Academy of Management Journal, 59 (4), 1113–23.
13.
FlintDaniel J.WoodruffRobert B.GardialSarah Fisher (2002), “Exploring the Phenomenon of Customers’ Desired Value Changes in a Business-to-Business Context,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (4), 102–17.
14.
GebhardtGary F.CarpenterGregory S.SherryJohnJr. (2006), “Creating a Market Orientation: A Longitudinal, Multifirm, Grounded Analysis of Cultural Transformation,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (4), 37–55.
15.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.
16.
GollnhoferJohanna F.WeijoHenri ASchoutenJohn W. (2019), “Consumer Movements and Value Regimes: Fighting Food Waste in Germany by Building Alternative Object Pathways,” Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (3), 460–82.
17.
GubaEgon G. (1981), “Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries,” Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29 (2), 75–91.
18.
GutmanJonathan (1982), “A Means-End Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (2), 60–72.
19.
HirschmanElizabeth C. (1986), “Humanistic Inquiry in Marketing Research: Philosophy, Method and Criteria,” Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (3), 237–49.
20.
HomburgChristianWorkmanJohn P.JensenOve (2000), “Fundamental Changes in Marketing Organization: The Movement Toward a Customer-Focused Organizational Structure,” Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (4), 459–78.
21.
HoustonMark B.KupferAnn-KristinHennig-ThurauThorstenSpannMartin (2018), “Pre-Release Consumer Buzz,” Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 46 (2), 338–60.
22.
MorganRobert M.HuntShelby D. (1994), “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 20–38.
23.
KahnemanDaniel (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
24.
KeaveneySusan M. (1995), “Customer Switching Behaviour in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (2), 71–82.
25.
KellerKevin L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (1), 1–22.
26.
KohliAjay (2009), “From the Editor,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (1), 1–2.
27.
KohliAjayJaworskiBernard J. (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 1–18.
28.
LehmannDonald R.McAlisterLeighStaelinRichard (2011), “Sophistication in Research in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (4), 155–65.
29.
LincolnYvonnaGubaEgon G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
30.
MacInnisDeborah (2011), “A Framework for Conceptual Contributions in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (4), 136–54.
31.
MacdonaldEmma K.KleinaltenkampMichaelWilsonHugh N. (2016), “How Business Customers Judge Solutions: Solution Quality and Value in Use,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (3), 96–120.
32.
MoormanChristineHeerdeHarald J. vanPage MoreauC.PalmatierRobert W. (2019a), “Challenging the Boundaries of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (5), 1–4.
33.
MoormanChristineHeerdeHarald J. vanPage MoreauC.PalmatierRobert W. (2019b), “JM as a Marketplace of Ideas,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (1), 1–7.
34.
MoorthyK. Sridhar (1993), “Theoretical Modeling in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (2), 92–106.
35.
MorganRobert M.HuntShelby D. (1994), “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 20–38.
36.
MorganNeil A.AndersonEugene W.MittalVikas (2005), “Understanding Firms’ Customer Satisfaction Information Usage,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (3), 131–51.
37.
NarayandasDasKasturi RanganV. (2004), “Building and Sustaining Buyer–Seller Relationships in Mature Industrial Markets,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (3), 63–77.
38.
NarverJohn C.SlaterStanley F. (1990), “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (4), 20–35.
39.
NunnallyJum C. (1978), Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
ParasuramanA.BerryLeonard L.ZeithamlValarie A. (1991a), “Perceived Service Quality as a Customer-Based Performance Measure: An Empirical Examination of Organizational Barriers Using an Extended Service Quality Model,” Human Resource Management, 30 (3), 335–64.
41.
ParasuramanA.BerryLeonard L.ZeithamlValarie A. (1991b), “Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale,” Journal of Retailing, 67 (4), 420–50.
42.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L. (1985), “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing, 49 (4), 41–50.
43.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L. (1988), “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Service Quality,” Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12–40.
44.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L. (1994a), “Alternative Scales for Measuring Service Quality: A Comparative Assessment Based on Psychometric and Diagnostic Criteria,” Journal of Retailing, 70 (3), 201–30.
45.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L. (1994b), “Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications of Future Research,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (1), 111–24.
46.
PietersRikBaumgartnerHans (2003), “The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and Its Subareas over Time,” Journal of Marketing, 67, (2), 123–39.
47.
ReibsteinDavid J.DayGeorgeWindJerry (2009), “Guest Editorial: Is Marketing Academia Losing Its Way?” Journal of Marketing, 73 (3), 1–3.
48.
ReynoldsThomas J.GutmanJ. (1988), “Laddering Theory, Method, Analysis, and Interpretation,” Journal of Advertising Research, 28 (1), 11–31.
49.
RustRoland T. (2006), “From the Editor: The Maturation of Marketing as an Academic Discipline,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (3), 1–2.
50.
RustRoland T.CooilBruce (1994), “Reliability Measures for Qualitative Data: Theory and Implications,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (1), 1–14.
51.
SlomanStevenFernbachPhilip (2017), The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone. London: Penguin.
52.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. (2018), “The Future of the Marketing Department at Business Schools,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46 (2), 169–72.
53.
StraussAnselm L.CorbinJuliet, eds. (1997), Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
54.
SuddabyRoy (2006), “From the Editors: What Grounded Theory Is Not,” Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4), 633–42.
55.
ThalerRichard (2015), Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioural Economics, Strauss, Anselm L. and Henry A. Giroux, eds. London: Penguin.
56.
TuliKapil R.KohliAjay K.BharadwajSundar G. (2007), “Rethinking Customer Solutions: From Product Bundles to Relational Processes,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (3), 1–17.
57.
UlagaWolfgangReinartzWerner J. (2011), “Hybrid Offerings: How Manufacturing Firms Combine Goods and Services Successfully,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (4), 5–23.
58.
VargoStephen L.LuschRobert F. (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 1–17.
59.
WorkmanJohn P.JrHomburgChristianGrunerKjell (1998), “Marketing Organization: An Integrative Framework of Dimensions and Determinants,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (3), 21–41.
60.
YadavManjit (2010), “The Decline of Conceptual Articles and Implications for Knowledge Development,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (1), 1–19.
61.
ZaltmanGerald (1983), “Theory-in-Use Among Change Agents,” in Handbook of Social and Community Intervention, SeidmanE., ed. Thousands Oks, CA: Sage Publications.
62.
ZaltmanGerald (1997), “Rethinking Market Research: Putting People Back In,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (4), 424–37.
63.
ZaltmanGerald (2003), How Customers Think. Boston: Harvard Business.
64.
ZaltmanGerald (2016), “Marketing’s Forthcoming Age of Imagination,” AMS Review, 6 (3/4), 99–115.
65.
ZaltmanGeraldCoulterRobin Higie (1995), “Seeing the Voice of the Customer: Metaphor Based Advertising Research,” Journal of Advertising Research, 35 (4), 35–51.
66.
ZaltmanGeraldLeMastersKarenHeffringMichael (1982), Theory Construction in Marketing: Some Thoughts on Thinking. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
67.
ZeithamlValarie A. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (3), 2–22.
68.
ZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L.ParasuramanA. (1988), “Communication and Control Processes in the Delivery of Service Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (2), 35–48.
69.
ZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L.ParasuramanA. (1993), “The Nature and Determinants of Customer Expectations of Service,” Journal of Academy of Marketing, 21 (1), 1–12.
70.
ZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L.ParasuramanA. (1996), “The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (2), 31–46.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
