Borrowing the concept of story grammar from reading comprehension literature, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of teaching word problem (WP) story grammar on arithmetic WP solving that emphasizes the algebraic expression of mathematical relations in conceptual models. Participants were five students in Grades 4 and 5 with or at risk for mathematics disabilities in two urban public elementary schools in the Midwest. An adapted multiple-probe-across-participants design was used to assess the functional relation between the intervention and students' problem-solving performance. The results indicated that conceptual model—based representation prompted by WP story grammar improved students' performance on arithmetic WP solving and promoted prealgebra concept and skill acquisition. The practical implications of integrating algebraic reasoning in elementary mathematics are discussed.
Bilsky, L.H., Blachman, S., Chi, C., Mui, A.C., & Winter, P. (1986). Comprehension strategies in math problem and story contexts. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 109-126.
2.
Bloom, B.S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Booth, L.R. (1988). Children's difficulties in beginning algebra. In A. F. Coxford & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), The ideas of algebra, K-12 (1988 yearbook) (pp. 20-32). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics .
4.
Boulineau, T., Fore, C., Hagan-Burke, S., & Burke, M.D. (2004). Use of story-mapping to increase the story-grammar text comprehension of elementary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 105-121.
5.
Brenner, M.E., Mayer, R.E., Moseley, B., Brar, T., Duran, R., Reed, B.S., et al. (1997). Learning by understanding: The role of multiple representations in learning algebra. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 663-689.
6.
Cai, J., Lew, H.C., Morris, A., Moyer, J.C., Ng, S.F., & Schmittau, J. (2004, April). The development of students' algebraic thinking in earlier grades: A cross-cultural comparative perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
7.
Carpenter, T.P., Levi, L., Berman, P.W., & Pligge, M. (2005). Developing algebraic reasoning in the elementary school. In T. A. Romberg, T. P. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 81-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Carraher, D.W., Schliemann, A.D., Brizuela, B.M., & Earnest, D. (2006). Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education . Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 87-115.
9.
Cawley, J., & Parmar, R.S. (2003). Mathematics assessment for students with mild disabilities, frameworks and practices. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 1(1), 20-26.
10.
Chappell, M., & Strutchens, M. (2001). Creating connections: Promoting algebraic thinking with concrete models. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7, 20-25.
11.
Chen, Z. (1999). Schema induction in children's analogical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 703-715.
12.
Connolly, A.J. (1998). KeyMath-Revised/Normative Update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
13.
Dimino, J., Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & Blake, G. (1990). Story grammar: An approach for promoting at-risk secondary students' comprehension of literature. Elementary School Journal, 91, 19-32.
14.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Finelli, R., Courey, S.J., & Hamlett, C.L. (2004). Expanding schema-based transfer instruction to help third graders solve real-life mathematical problems. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 419-445.
15.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C.L., Owen, R., et al. (2003). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 293-305.
16.
Gardill, M.C., & Jitendra, A.K. (1999). Advanced story map instruction: Effects on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities . Journal of Special Education, 33, 2-17.
17.
Geary, D.C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4-15.
18.
Gick, M., & Holyoak, K.H. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
19.
Gonzalez, J.E.J., & Espinel, A.I.G. (1999). Is IQ-achievement discrepancy relevant in the definition of arithmetic learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 291-301.
20.
Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations . In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 276-295). New York: Macmillan.
21.
Gurney, D., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., & Carnine, D. (2001). Story grammar: Effective literature instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 335-348.
22.
Hegarty, M., Mayer, R.E., & Monk, C.A. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 18-32.
23.
Horner, R.D., & Baer, D.M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189-196.
24.
Hutchinson, N.L. (1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 16, 34-63.
25.
Jitendra, A.K., Griffin, C.C., McGoey, K., Gardill, M.C., Bhat, P., & Riley, T. (1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 345-355.
26.
Jonassen, D.H. (2003). Designing research-based instruction for story problems. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 267-296.
27.
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Kilpatrick, J.,Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29.
Krutetskii, V.A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mandler, J.M., & Johnson, N.S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
32.
Mayer, R.E. (1999). The promise of educational psychology, Vol. 1: Learning in the content areas. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
33.
Moses, B. (1997). Algebra for a new century. Teaching Children Mathematics, 3, 264-265.
34.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics electronic version. Available at http://standards.nctm.org
35.
Otis, A.S., & Lennon, R.T. (1995). Otis-Lennon School Ability Test (7th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Psychological Corporation. (2001). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author.
38.
Quilici, J., & Mayer. R. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology , 88, 144-161.
39.
Rand, R.H. (1984). Computer algebra in applied mathematics: An introduction to MACSYMA. Boston: Pitman.
40.
RAND Mathematics Study Panel. (2003). Mathematical proficiency for all students: Toward a strategic research and development program in mathematics education. Santa Monica, CA: Author.
41.
Richards, S.B., Taylor, R.L., Ramasamy, R., & Richards, R.Y. (1999). Single subject research: Applications in education and clinical settings. San Diego , CA: Singular Publishing Group.
42.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221-242.
43.
Silver, E.A., & Marshall, S.P. (1990). Mathematical and scientific problem solving: Findings, issues, and instructional implications. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 265-290). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Sorrell, A.L. (1990). Three reading comprehension strategies: TELLS, story mapping, and QARs. Academic Therapy, 25, 359-368.
45.
Sowder, L. (1988). Children's solutions of story problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 227-238.
46.
Stein, N.L., & Glenn, C.G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
The Northwest Evaluation Association. (n.d.). Measure of Academic Progress (MAP). Lake Oswego, OR: Author.
48.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Retrieved August 16, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
49.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. Retrieved August 16, 2006, from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ446.108
50.
Van de Walle, J.A. (2004). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (5th ed.). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
51.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
52.
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
53.
Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). WJ-III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
54.
Xin, Y.P., Jitendra, A., & Deatline-Buchman, A. (2005). Effects of mathematical word problem-solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems . Journal of Special Education, 39, 181-192.
55.
Zawaiza, T.B.W., & Gerber, M.M. (1993). Effects of explicit instruction on community college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 16, 64-79.
56.
Zentall, S.S., & Ferkis, M.A. (1993). Mathematical problem solving for youth with ADHD, with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 16, 6-18.
