This study examines the development of a specific sub-skill for studying and improving teaching—the generation of hypotheses about the effects of teaching on student learning. Two groups of elementary preservice teachers (PSTs) were compared: one group that attended a typical mathematics-methods course and one that attended a course integrating analysis skills for learning from teaching. Data consist of PSTs’ comments on video clips of mathematics instruction administered before and after course completion. Findings reveal that PSTs at the beginning of the program struggled to generate hypotheses with relevant evidence, often equating teacher behavior or student correct answers as evidence of student understanding. After course participation, PSTs who attended the course with integrated analysis skills significantly improved in their ability to generate hypotheses based on student evidence whereas their counterparts continued to display difficulties. Implications for teacher education and future research are considered.
BallD. L. (1997). What do students know? Facing challenges of distance, context and desire in trying to hear children. In BibbleB.GoodT.GoodsonI. (Eds.), International handbook on teachers and teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 679-718). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Press.
2.
BartellT. G.WebelC.BowenB.DysonN. (2013). Prospective teacher learning: Recognizing evidence of con-ceptual understanding. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Edu-cation, 16(1), 57-79. doi:10.1007/s10857-012-9205-4
3.
BerkD.HiebertJ. (2009). Improving the mathematics pre-paration of elementary teachers, one lesson at a time. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(3), 337-356.
4.
BorkoH.JacobsJ.EiteljorgE.PittmanM. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathe-matics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417-436.
5.
BrownA. L.BransfordJ. D.FerraraR. A.CampioneJ. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In FlavellJ. H.MarkamE. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psy-chology (Vol. 3, pp. 77-166). New York, NY: Wiley.
FernandezC.CannonJ.ChokshiS. (2003). A US-Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 171-185.
11.
FrankeM. L.KazemiE.BatteyD. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In LesterF. K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225-256). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
12.
GivvinK.SantagataR. (2011). Toward a common language for discussing the features of effective professional develop-ment: The case of a U.S. mathematics program. Professional Development in Education, 37(3), 439-451.
13.
HammernessK.Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ.BerlinerD.Cochran-SmithM.McDonaldM.ZeichnerK. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In Darling-Ham-mondL.BransfordJ.LePageP.HammernessK.DuffyH. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358-389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
HawkinsD. (1973). What it means to teach. Teachers College Record, 75(1), 7-16.
15.
HiebertJ.CarpenterT. P.FennemaE.FusonK. C.WearneD.MurrayH. . . . HumanP. (1997). Making sense: Teach-ing and learning mathematics with understanding. Ports-mouth, NH: Heinemann.
16.
HiebertJ.MorrisA. K.BerkD.JansenA. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 47-61.
17.
HiebertJ.MorrisA. K.GlassB. (2003). Learning to learn to teach: An “experiment” model for teaching and teacher pre-paration in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 201-222.
18.
HiebertJ.StiglerJ. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS video study. Elementary School Journal, 101, 3-20.
19.
JacobsV. R.PhilippR. A. (2004). Mathematical thinking: Helping prospective and practicing teachers focus. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11, 194-201.
20.
JansenA.SpitzerS. M. (2009). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ reflective thinking skills: Descriptions of their students’ thinking and interpretations of their teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(2), 133-151.
21.
KerstingN. (2008). Using video clips as item prompts to measure teachers’ knowledge about teaching mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 845-861.
22.
KerstingN.GivvinK.ThompsonB.SantagataR.StiglerJ. (2012). Measuring usable knowledge: Teachers’ analyses of mathematics classroom videos predict teaching quality and student learning. American Education Research Journal, 49, 568-589.
23.
LampertM.GrazianiF. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers’ and teacher educators’ learning. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491-509.
24.
McDonaldM.KazemiE.KavanaghS. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378-386.
25.
Moore-RussoD.WilseyJ. N. (2014). Delving into the meaning of productive reflection: A study of future teachers’ reflection on representations of teaching. Teaching and Teac-her Education, 37, 76-90.
26.
MorrisA. K. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ skills for an-alyzing teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 9(5), 471-505.
27.
MorrisA. K.HiebertJ.SpitzerS. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can preservice teachers learn?Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 491-529.
28.
PhilippR.CabralC.SchappelleB. (2011). IMAP Integrating mathematics and pedagogy: Searchable collection of children’s-mathematical-thinking video clips. United States: Pearson.
29.
SantagataR.AngeliciG. (2010). Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on pre-service teachers’ ability to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 339-349.
30.
SantagataR.GuarinoJ. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM. The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 43(1), 133–145.
31.
SantagataR.van EsE. (2010). Disciplined analysis of mathematics teaching as a routine of practice. In LottJ. W.LuebeckJ. (Eds.), AMTE Monograph 7: Mathematics teach-ing: Putting research into practice at all levels (pp. 109-123). San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educa-tors.
32.
SantagataR.ZannoniC.StiglerJ. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in preservice teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123-140.
33.
SeagoN. (2004). Using video as an object of inquiry for mathematics teaching and learning. In BrophyJ. (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 249-286). San Diego, CA: El-sevier.
34.
SpitzerS. M.PhelpsC. M.BeyerJ. E. R.JohnsonD. Y.SieminskiE. M. (2010). Developing prospective elementary teachers’ abilities to identify evidence of student mathematical achievement. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(1), 67-87.
35.
SmithM.SteinM. K. (2011). Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
36.
StockeroS. L. (2008). Using a video-based curriculum to develop a reflective stance in prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematic Teaching Education, 11(5), 373-394.
37.
Van de WalleJ. A.KarpK. S.Bay-WilliamsJ. M. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching deve-lopmentally. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
van EsE. A.SherinM. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596.
