T. Philip Nichols and Alexander Monea explore the spread of data-driven surveillance (i.e., dataveillance) technologies in schools, which are increasingly used as a strategy for mitigating safety risks. They argue that the sense of security schools derive from these technologies often comes at the cost of students’ actual well-being and privacy. Drawing on research with teachers and administrators, they highlight several ethical challenges dataveillance technologies raise as they are incorporated into classrooms. They conclude with suggestions for how educators might de-escalate their dependence on dataveillance without compromising students’ safety.
AnandP.BergenM. (2021). Big teacher is watching: How AI spyware took over schools. Bloomberg.
2.
BenjaminR. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Polity Press.
3.
CasellaR. (2018). School security and its corporate offerings. In DeakinJ.TaylorE.KupchikA. (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of school discipline, surveillance, and social control (pp. 389–404). Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
Every Student Succeeds Act, 114-95 U.S.C. (2015).
5.
FeathersT. (2019). Schools spy on kids to prevent shootings, but there is no evidence it works. Vice.
6.
FourcadeM.HealyK. (2017). Seeing like a market. Socio-Economic Review, 15 (1), 9–29.
7.
GarciaA.NicholsT.P. (2021). Digital platforms aren’t mere tools — they’re complex environments. Phi Delta Kappan, 102 (6), 14–19.
8.
GillumJ.KaoJ. (2019). Aggression detectors: The unproven, invasive surveillance technology schools are using to monitor students. ProPublica.
9.
KamenetzA. (2016). Software flags suicidal students, presenting privacy dilemma. NPR.
10.
KeierleberM. (2018, August9). Inside the $3 billion school security industry. The 74 Million.
11.
LivingstoneS.StoilovaM.NandagiriR. (2019). Children’s data and privacy online: Growing up in a digital age. Research Findings. London School of Economics and Political Science.
12.
MoneaA. (2022). The digital closet: How the internet became straight. MIT Press.
13.
PangrazioL.StornaiuoloA.NicholsT.P.GarciaA.PhilipT. (2022). Datafication meets platformization: Materializing data processes in teaching and learning. Harvard Educational Review, 92 (2), 257–283.
14.
SewellG. (2012). Organization, employees, and surveillance. In BallK.HaggertyK.LyonD. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 303–313). Routledge.
15.
Trevor Project. (2019). National survey on LGBTQ mental health. Author.
16.
van DijckJ. (2014). Datafication, dataism, and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12 (2), 197–208.
