Personality traits are one piece in the larger puzzle of political participation, but most studies focus on the Five-Factor Model of personality. We argue that the normative implications of the influence of personality on politics are increased when the personality traits being studied correlate with negative social behaviors. We investigate the role of the Dark Triad on political participation as mediated through political beliefs such as interest and knowledge. We find that Psychopathy and Narcissism are positively associated with political interest, but Narcissism is also negatively associated with political knowledge. In addition, both Psychopathy and Narcissism exert a direct, positive influence on participation. Our results imply that individuals exhibiting higher levels of Narcissism are not only less knowledgeable but also more interested in politics and more likely to participate when given the opportunity.
AshtonMCLeeKde VriesRE (2014) The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors: A Review of Research and Theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review18: 139–152.
2.
AshtonMCLeeKGoldbergLR (2004) A Hierarchical Analysis of 1,710 English Personality-Descriptive Adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87: 707–721.
3.
BabiakPHareRD (2006) Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work. New York: Regan Books; HarperCollins.
4.
BarberB (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
5.
BarkerRA (1994) The Rethinking of Leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies1: 46–54.
6.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (6): 1173–1182.
7.
BlackPJWoodworthMPorterS (2014) The Big Bad Wolf? The Relation Between the Dark Triad and the Interpersonal Assessment of Vulnerability. Personality and Individual Differences67: 52–56.
8.
BlaisJPruysersS (2017) The Power of the Dark Side: Personality, the Dark Triad, and Political Ambition. Personality and Individual Differences113: 167–172.
9.
BlaisJPruysersSChenP (2019) Why Do They Run? The Psychological Underpinnings of Political Ambition. Canadian Journal of Political Science52 (4): 1–19.
10.
BlaisASt-VincentSL (2011) Personality Traits, Political Attitudes and the Propensity to Vote. European Journal of Political Research50 (3): 395–417.
11.
BlaisJSolodukhinEForthAE (2014) A Meta-analysis Exploring the Relationship Between Psychopathy and Instrumental Versus Reactive Violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior41 (7): 797–821.
12.
BoddyJCarverARowleyK (1986) Effects of Positive and Negative Verbal Reinforcement on Performance as a Function of Extraversion-Introversion: Some Tests of Gray’s Theory. Personality and Individual Differences7 (1): 81–88.
13.
BradyHEVerbaSSchlozmanKL (1995) Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation. American Political Science Review89 (2): 271–294.
14.
BullockJGHaSE (2011) Mediation Analysis Is Harder Than It Looks. In: DruckmanJNGreenDPKuklinskiJH, et al. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.508–522.
15.
CampbellAConversePMillerW, et al. (1960) The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
ChenPGPalmerCL (2018) The Prejudiced Personality? Using the Big Five to Predict Susceptibility to Stereotyping Behavior. American Politics Research46 (2): 276–307.
17.
ChirumboloALeoneL (2010) Personality and Politics: The Role of the HEXACO Model of Personality in Predicting Ideology and Voting. Personality and Individual Differences49 (1): 43–48.
18.
ChristieRGeisFL (1970) Studies in Machiavellianism. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
19.
CraigSCMaggiottoMA (1982) Measuring Political Efficacy. Political Methodology8: 85–109.
20.
CraigSCNiemiRGSilverGE (1990) Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items. Political Behavior12 (3): 289–314.
21.
de ZavalaAGCichockaAEidelsonR, et al. (2009) Collective Narcissism and Its Social Consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology97 (6): 1074–1096.
22.
Delli-CarpiniMKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
DeShongHLGrantDMMullins-SweattSN (2015) Comparing Models of Counterproductive Workplace Behaviors: The Five-Factor Model and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences74: 55–60.
24.
DryzekJSListC (2003) Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science33 (1): 1–28.
25.
FedericoCMde ZavalaAG (2018) Collective Narcissism and the 2016 US Presidential Vote. Public Opinion Quarterly82 (1): 110–121.
26.
FennoR (1978) Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
27.
FurnhamABradleyA (1997) Music While You Work: The Differential Distraction of Background Music on the Cognitive Test Performance of Introverts and Extraverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition11 (5): 445–455.
28.
FurtnerMRMaranTRauthmannJF (2017) Dark Leadership: The Role of Leaders’ Dark Triad Personality Traits. In: ClarkMGruberC (eds) Leader Development Deconstructed. Cham: Springer, pp.75–99.
29.
GayJGLishnerDAVitaccoMJ, et al. (2019) Deconstructing the Association Between Psychopathy and Political Orientation: Is it Attributable to Moral Intuitions or Moral Competency?Personality and Individual Differences149: 128–134.
30.
GerberASHuberGDohertyD, et al. (2011a) Personality Traits and Participation in Political Processes. Journal of Politics73 (3): 692–706.
31.
GerberASHuberGDohertyD, et al. (2011b) The Big Five Personality Traits in the Political Arena. Annual Review of Political Science14: 265–287.
32.
GerberASHuberGDohertyD, et al. (2013) Big Five Personality Traits and Responses to Persuasive Appeals: Results from Voter Turnout Experiments. Political Behavior35 (4): 687–728.
33.
GidengilEBlaisANevitteN, et al. (2004) Citizens. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
34.
GilensMPageBI (2014) Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics12 (3): 564–581.
35.
GoldbergL (1990) An Alternative “Description of Personality”: The Big-Five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59: 1216–1229.
36.
GreenDPHaSEBullockJG (2010) Enough Already about “Black Box” Experiments: Studying Mediation Is More Difficult Than Most Scholars Suppose. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science628 (1): 200–208.
37.
HareRD (2003) The Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. Toronto, ON, Canada: Springer.
38.
HartWRichardsonKTortorielloGK (2018) Dark Personality Voters Find Dark Politicians More Relatable and Fit for Office. Journal of Research in Personality75: 59–68.
39.
JonasonPKSlomskiSPartykaJ (2012) The Dark Triad at Work: How Toxic Employees Get Their Way. Personality and Individual Differences52 (3): 449–453.
40.
JonasonPKWebsterGD (2010) The Dirty Dozen: A Concise Measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment22 (2): 420.
41.
JonesDNPaulhusDL (2014) Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A Brief Measure of Dark Personality Traits. Assessment21 (1): 28–41.
42.
JudgeTAPiccoloRFKosalkaT (2009) The Bright and Dark Sides of Leader Traits: A Review and Theoretical Extension of the Leader Trait Paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly20 (6): 855–875.
43.
LauRRRedlawskDP (2006) How Voters Decide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
LeeKAshtonMC (2004) Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research39 (2): 329–358.
45.
LeeKAshtonMC (2005) Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure. Personality and Individual Differences38 (7): 1571–1582.
46.
Lewis-BeckMJacobyWNorpothH, et al. (2008) The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
47.
LilienfeldSOWaldmanIDLandfieldK, et al. (2012) Fearless Dominance and the U.S. Presidency: Implications of Psychopathic Personality Traits for Successful and Unsuccessful Political Leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology103 (3): 489–505.
48.
McCraeRCostaP (2003) Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
49.
McHoskeyJW (1999) Machiavellianism, Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goals, and Social Interest: A Self-Determination Theory Analysis. Motivation and Emotion23 (4): 267–283.
50.
MarchlewskaMCichockaAPanayiotouO, et al. (2018) Populism as Identity Politics: Perceived In-Group Disadvantage, Collective Narcissism, and Support for Populism. Social Psychological and Personality Science9 (2): 151–162.
51.
MayhewD (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
MondakJ (2010) Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
MondakJHalperinK (2008) A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behavior. British Journal of Political Science38: 335–362.
54.
MondakJHibbingMCanacheD, et al. (2010) Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior. American Political Science Review104: 85–110.
55.
NaiA (2019) Disagreeable Narcissists, Extroverted Psychopaths, and Elections: A New Dataset to Measure the Personality of Candidates Worldwide. European Political Science18 (2): 309–334.
56.
NiemiRGCraigSCMatteiF (1991) Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review85 (4): 1407–1413.
57.
O’BoyleEHJrForsythDRBanksGC, et al. (2012) A Meta-Analysis of the Dark Triad and Work Behavior: A Social Exchange Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology97 (3): 557–579.
58.
PaulhusDLWilliamsKM (2002) The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality36 (6): 556–563.
59.
PetersonRDPalmerCL (2019) The Dark Triad and Nascent Political Ambition. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. Epub ahead of print 29 August. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2019.1660354.
60.
PorterSWoodworthMBlackPJ (2018) Psychopathy and Aggression. In: PatrickC (ed.) The Handbook of Psychopathy. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
61.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2004) SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers36 (4): 717–731.
62.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models. Behavior Research Methods40 (3): 879–891.
63.
PruysersSBlaisJ (2019) Narcissistic Women and Cash-Strapped Men: Who Can Be Encouraged to Consider Running for Political Office, and Who Should Do the Encouraging?Political Research Quarterly72 (1): 229–242.
64.
PruysersSBlaisJChenPG (2019) Who Makes a Good Citizen? The Role of Personality. Personality and Individual Differences146: 99–104.
65.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. In: Culture and Politics. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
66.
RauthmannJFKolarGP (2012) How “Dark” are the Dark Triad Traits? Examining the Perceived Darkness of Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences53 (7): 884–889.
67.
ReidyDEKearnsMCDeGueS, et al. (2015) Why Psychopathy Matters: Implications for Public Health and Violence Prevention. Aggression and Violent Behavior24: 214–225.
68.
RhodewaltFPetersonB (2009) Narcissism. In: LearyMRHoyleRH (eds) Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior. New York: Guilford Press, pp.547–560.
69.
RosenstoneSHansenJM (2003) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. London: Pearson.
70.
SchmeckRRLockhartD (1983) Introverts and Extraverts Require Different Learning Environments. Educational Leadership40 (5): 54–55.
71.
SchoenHSchumannS (2007) Personality Traits, Partisan Attitudes, and Voting Behavior. Evidence from Germany. Political Psychology28 (4): 471–498.
72.
SmithSFLilienfeldSOCoffeyK, et al. (2013) Are Psychopaths and Heroes Twigs off the Same Branch? Evidence from College, Community, and Presidential Samples. Journal of Research in Personality47 (5): 634–646.
73.
SnidermanP (1975) Personality and Democratic Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
74.
SobelME (1982) Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methodology13: 290–312.
75.
SobelME (1986) Some New Results on Indirect Effects and Their Standard Errors in Covariance Structure Models. Sociological Methodology16: 159–186.
76.
StolleDMichelettiM (2013) Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
77.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyH (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78.
WattsALLilienfeldSOSmithSF, et al. (2013) The Double-Edged Sword of Grandiose Narcissism: Implications for Successful and Unsuccessful Leadership among US Presidents. Psychological Science24 (12): 2379–2389.
79.
WilhelmPGWilhelmJPWilhelmTG (2013) Testing Maccoby’s Theory of Productive Narcissism with US Presidents: Global Competitiveness and Dark Triad Implications. Competition Forum11: 289–296.
80.
WilliamsKMPaulhusDLHareRD (2007) Capturing the Four-factor Structure of Psychopathy in College Students via Self-report. Journal of Personality Assessment88 (2): 205–219.
81.
WolfingerRRosenstoneS (1980) Who Votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
