Previous research has provided contested hypotheses about the impact of income inequality on electoral participation. This study reexamines the debate between conflict and relative power theories by focusing on a largely ignored factor: social mobility. We argue that social mobility conditions the inequality-participation nexus by alleviating the frustration, class conflict, and efficacy gaps between the rich and the poor that the prevailing theories assume income inequality to create. By utilizing the Cooperative Congressional Election Survey, we test this argument focusing on US counties. Our analysis confirms that the effects of income inequality on citizens’ likelihood of voting vary depending on mobility, suggesting that social mobility provides a crucial context in which income inequality can play out in substantially different ways. This article implies that more scholarly endeavors should be made to clarify the multifaceted structure of inequality for improving our understanding of the relationship between economic and political inequality.
AbramsonPBooksJ (1971) Social Mobility and Political Attitudes: A Study of Intergenerational Mobility among Young British Men. Comparative Politics3 (3): 403–428.
2.
AbramsonPClaggettW (1991) Racial Differences in Self-Reported and Validated Turnout in the 1988 Presidential Election. The Journal of Politics53 (1): 186–197.
3.
AlesinaALa FerraraE (2005) Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities. Journal of Public Economics89 (5–6): 897–931.
4.
AlesinaABaqirREasterlyW (1999) Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics114 (4): 1243–1284.
5.
AlesinaAStantchevaSTesoE (2018) Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution. American Economic Review108 (2): 521–554.
6.
AndersonCJBeramendiP (2008) Income, Inequality, and Electoral Participation. In: AndersonCJBeramendiP (eds.) Democracy, Inequality, and Representation in Comparative Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp.278–311.
7.
AnsolabehereSHershE (2012) Validation: What Big Data Reveal About Survey Misreporting and the Real Electorate. Political Analysis20 (4): 437–459.
8.
AveryJM (2015) Does Who Votes Matter? Income Bias in Voter Turnout and Economic Inequality in the American States from 1980 to 2010. Political Behavior37 (4): 955–976.
9.
BachrachPBaratzMS (1962) Two Faces of Power. American Political Science Review56 (4): 947–952.
10.
BellerEHoutM (2006) Intergenerational Social Mobility: The United States in Comparative Perspective. The Future of Children16 (2): 19–36.
11.
BenabouROkEA (2001) Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The Poum Hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics116 (2): 447–487.
12.
BerryWDGolderMMiltonD (2012) Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction. The Journal of Politics74 (3): 653–671.
13.
BlauPDuncanOD (1967) The American Occupational Structure. New York: The Free Press.
14.
BradyHE (2004) An Analytical Perspective on Participatory Inequality and Income Inequality. In: Neckerman (ed.) Social Inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp.667–702.
BraumoellerBF (2004) Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms. International Organization58 (4): 807–820.
17.
BreenR (2001) Social Mobility and Constitutional and Political Preferences in Northern Ireland. The British Journal of Sociology52 (4): 621–645.
18.
BreenRJonssonJO (2007) Explaining Change in Social Fluidity: Educational Equalization and Educational Expansion in Twentieth-Century Sweden. American Journal of Sociology112 (6): 1775–1810.
19.
CareyJMHoriuchiY (2017) Compulsory Voting and Income Inequality: Evidence for Lijphart’s Proposition from Venezuela. Latin American Politics and Society59 (2): 122–144.
20.
ChettyRHendrenNKlineP, et al (2014) Where Is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics129 (4): 1553–1623.
21.
ClarkTNLipsetSM (1991) Are Social Classes Dying?International Sociology6 (4): 397–410.
22.
CrucesGPerez-TrugliaRTetazM (2013) Biased Perceptions of Income Distribution and Preferences for Redistribution: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. Journal of Public Economics98: 100–112.
23.
CurtisJ (2016) Social Mobility and Class Identity: The Role of Economic Conditions in 33 Societies, 1999–2009. European Sociological Review32 (1): 108–121.
24.
DaenekindtS (2017) The Experience of Social Mobility: Social Isolation, Utilitarian Individualism, and Social Disorientation. Social Indicators Research133 (1): 15–30.
25.
DaenekindtSVan der WaalJDe KosterW (2018) Social Mobility and Political Distrust: Cults of Gratitude and Resentment?Acta Politica53 (2): 269–282.
26.
DahlRA (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. London: Yale University Press.
27.
DahlRA (2006) On Political Equality. London: Yale University Press.
28.
De GraafNDUlteeW (1990) Individual Preferences, Social Mobility and Electoral Outcomes. Electoral Studies9 (2): 109–132.
29.
De GraafNDNieuwbeertaPHeathA (1995) Class Mobility and Political Preferences: Individual and Contextual Effects. American Journal of Sociology100 (4): 997–1027.
30.
De TocquevilleA (2003) Democracy in America. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.
31.
FrankoW (2015) More Equal Than We Thought? Using Vote Validation to Better Understand Participation Inequality in the States. State Politics & Policy Quarterly15 (1): 91–114.
32.
FrankoW (2017) Understanding Public Perceptions of Growing Economic Inequality. State Politics & Policy Quarterly17 (3): 319–348.
33.
FrankoWWKellyNJWitkoC (2016) Class Bias in Voter Turnout, Representation, and Income Inequality. Perspectives on Politics14 (2): 351–368.
34.
GaventaJ (1982) Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
35.
GiddensASuttonPW (2017) Essential Concepts in Sociology, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Polity Press.
36.
GoldthorpeJH (2013) Understanding—and Misunderstanding—Social Mobility in Britain: The Entry of the Economists, the Confusion of Politicians and the Limits of Educational Policy. Journal of Social Policy42 (3): 431–450.
37.
GoldthorpeJHLlewellynCPayneC (1980) Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain, 2nd edn.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
38.
GoodinRDryzekJ (1980) Rational Participation: The Politics of Relative Power. British Journal of Political Science10 (3): 273–292.
39.
GranbergDHolmbergS (1991) Self-Reported Turnout and Voter Validation. American Journal of Political Science35 (2): 448–459.
40.
GrimmerJHershEMeredithM, et al. (2018) Obstacles to Estimating Voter ID Laws’ Effect on Turnout. The Journal of Politics80 (3): 1045–1051.
41.
HackerJSPiersonP (2010) Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States. Politics & Society38 (2): 152–204.
42.
HauserOPNortonMI (2017) (Mis)perceptions of Inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology18: 21–25.
43.
HornD (2011) Income Inequality and Voter Turnout—Evidence from European National Elections (GINI Discussion Paper 16). Amsterdam: AIAS.
44.
HouleCMillerMK (2019) Social Mobility and Democratic Attitudes: Evidence From Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Political Studies52 (11): 1610–1647.
45.
Jaime-CastilloAM (2008) Expectations of Social Mobility, Meritocracy and the Demand for Redistribution in Spain (ID 1278562, SSRN Scholarly Paper). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
46.
Jaime-CastilloAM (2009) Economic Inequality and Electoral Participation: A Cross-country Evaluation (ID 1515905, SSRN Scholarly Paper, 6September). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1515905 (accessed 13 October 2018).
47.
Jaime-CastilloAMMarqués PeralesI (2019) Social Mobility and Demand for Redistribution in Europe: A Comparative Analysis. The British Journal of Sociology70 (1): 138–165.
48.
JensenCJespersenBB (2017) To Have or Not to Have: Effects of Economic Inequality on Turnout in European Democracies. Electoral Studies45: 24–28.
49.
KellyNJEnnsPK (2010) Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-Reinforcing Link Between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences. American Journal of Political Science54 (4): 855–870.
50.
LipsetS (1960) Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Doubleday.
51.
LipsetSMBendixR (1959) Social Mobility in Industrial Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
52.
LopreatoJ (1967) Upward Social Mobility and Political Orientation. American Sociological Review32 (4): 586–592.
53.
LukesSM (1986) Power. New York: NYU Press.
54.
MarshallG (1998) A Dictionary of Sociology, 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
MeltzerAHRichardSF (1981) A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy89 (5): 914.
56.
NewmanBJJohnstonCDLownPL (2015) False Consciousness or Class Awareness? Local Income Inequality, Personal Economic Position, and Belief in American Meritocracy. American Journal of Political Science59 (2): 326–340.
57.
OECD (2018) A Broken Social Elevator?How to Promote Social Mobility (COPE Policy Brief). Available at: http://oe.cd/social-mobility-2018 (accessed 13 May 2020).
58.
OliverJE (2001) Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
PikettyT (1995) Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics110 (3): 551–584.
60.
PikettyTSaezE (2003) Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998. The Quarterly Journal of Economics118 (1): 1–41.
61.
SchattschneiderE (1975) The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
62.
ShawDde la GarzaROLeeJ (2000) Examining Latino Turnout in 1996: A Three-State, Validated Survey Approach. American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 338–346.
63.
SilverBDAndersonBAAbramsonPR (1986) Who Overreports Voting?The American Political Science Review80 (2): 613–624.
64.
SnijdersTABBoskerRJ (2011) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing.
65.
SoltF (2008) Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 48–60.
66.
SoltF (2010) Does Economic Inequality Depress Electoral Participation? Testing the Schattschneider Hypothesis. Political Behavior32 (2): 285–301.
67.
SoltFKimDLeeKY, et al (2014) Neoliberal Reform and Protest in Latin American Democracies: A Replication and Correction. Research and Politics1 (2): 1–13.
68.
SorokinPA (1927) Social Mobility. New York: Harper & Brothers.
69.
StaceyB (1966) Inter-Generation Mobility and Voting. The Public Opinion Quarterly30 (1): 133–139.
70.
SteenbergenMRJonesBS (2002) Modeling Multilevel Data Structures. American Journal of Political Science46 (1): 218–237.
71.
StockemerDParentS (2014) The Inequality Turnout Nexus: New Evidence from Presidential Elections. Politics & Policy42 (2): 221–245.
72.
StockemerDScruggsL (2012) Income Inequality, Development and Electoral Turnout—New Evidence on a Burgeoning Debate. Electoral Studies31 (4): 764–773.
73.
TuminM (1957) Some Unapplauded Consequences of Social Mobility in a Mass Society. Social Forces36 (1): 32–36.
74.
UslanerEBrownM (2005) Inequality, Trust, and Civic Engagement. American Politics Research33 (6): 868–894.
75.
XuPGarandJC (2010) Economic Context and Americans’ Perceptions of Income Inequality. Social Science Quarterly91 (5): 1220–1241.
76.
YaishMAndersenR (2012) Social Mobility in 20 Modern Societies: The Role of Economic and Political Context. Social Science Research41 (3): 527–538
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
