The environmental issue has become prominent in the public debate and, consequently, is likely to correlate with voting preferences. We explore this by addressing the voting demand-side and the support to parties according to their distance from the voters’ position on the environment. We considered the European Parliament elections in 2019 and employed both individual and party-level data to assess the role of environmental issue voting. We found that environmental issue voting has held relevance in affecting voting preferences across Western Europe. Nonetheless, this relevance has rewarded mostly those parties with anti-environmental positions, and those belonging to the radical right party family. Hence, although green parties have somehow held their electoral benefits on pro-environmentalism, this represents only one of the possible explanations for their growing vote share. These findings highlight the importance of the environmental issue voting and its potential divisiveness among the electorate.
Abou-ChadiT (2016) Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts. How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact. British Journal of Political Science46 (2): 417–436.
2.
AingerFFanettiS (2025) Youth Climate Activism: Political and Regulatory Outcomes. In: AlbaneseVEFanettiSMinazziR (eds) Social Mobilisation for Climate Change.London: Routledge, pp.111–128.
3.
AkkermanT (2012) Immigration Policy and Electoral Competition in Western Europe: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Party Positions Over the past Two Decades. Party Politics21 (1): 54–67.
4.
AngelucciDVittoriD (2021) Look Where You’re Going: The Cultural and Economic Explanations of Class Voting Decline. West European Politics46 (1): 122–147.
5.
AngelucciDDe SioL (2021) Issue Characterization of Electoral Change (and How Recent Elections in Western Europe Were Won on Economic Issues). Italian Journal of Electoral Studies 84 1: 45–67.
6.
AngelucciDCarrieriLFranklinM (2019)Much Ado about Nothing? The EP Elections in Comparative Perspective. In: De SioLFranklinMRussoL (eds) The European Parliament Elections of 2019. Rome: Luiss University Press, pp.15–27.
7.
ArndtCHalikiopoulouDVrakopoulosC (2023) The Centre-Periphery Divide and Attitudes Towards Climate Change Measures among Western Europeans. Environmental Politics32 (3): 381–406.
8.
BacciniLLeemannL (2021) Do Natural Disasters Help the Environment? How Voters Respond and What That Means. Political Science Research and Methods9 (3): 468–484.
9.
BaranowskiMHuberRAJabkowskiP, et al. (2024) Left–Right Political Orientation Fails to Explain Environmental Attitudes of Europeans Outside Western Europe: Exploring the Moderating Role of Party Positions and Issue Salience. Environmental Politics. Epub ahead of print 11 September. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2024.2401257.
BellAFairbrotherMJonesK (2019) Fixed and Random Effects Models: Making an Informed Choice. Quality & Quantity53 (2): 1051–1074.
12.
BetzHG (1994) Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
BornschierSKriesiH (2012) The Populist Right, the Working Class, and the Changing Face of Class Politics. In: RydgrenJ (ed.) Class Politics and the Radical Right. London: Routledge, pp.10–30.
14.
BraunDSchäferC (2022) Issues That Mobilize Europe. The Role of Key Policy Issues for Voter Turnout in the 2019 European Parliament Election. European Union Politics23 (1): 120–140.
15.
BudgeIFarlieD (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty–Three Democracies. London: George Allen and Unwin.
16.
CaianiMLubardaB (2023) Conditional Environmentalism of Right-Wing Populism in Power: Ideology and/or Opportunities?Environmental Politics33 (4): 591–611.
17.
CarminesEGStimsonJA (1980) The Two Faces of Issue Voting. American Political Science Review74 (1): 78–91.
18.
CarrieriL (2024) Awakening the Europhile Giant: EU Issue Voting in Western and Central-Eastern Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies62 (1): 262–284.
19.
CarrieriLMoriniM (2022) The Changing Structure of Political Conflicts in the South of Europe: An Analysis of Issue Voting in Four Countries. Political Studies Review22 (1): 55–76.
20.
CarterN (2010) The Greens in the 2009 European Parliament Election. Environmental Politics19 (2): 295–302.
21.
ChaistyPWhitefieldS (2015) Attitudes Towards the Environment: Are Post-communist Societies (still) Different?Environmental Politics24 (4): 598–616.
22.
ChinnSHartPSSorokaS (2020) Politicization and Polarization in Climate Change News Content, 1985-2017. Science Communication42 (1): 112–129.
23.
Costa LoboM (ed.) (2023) The Impact of EU Politicisation on Voting Behaviour in Europe. Cham: Palgrave McMillan.
24.
DaltonRJ (2018) Political Realignment: Economics, Culture, and Electoral Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
DaltonRJFarrellDMMcAllisterI (2011) Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
DassonnevilleRHoogheLMarksG (2023) Transformation of the Political Space: A Citizens’ Perspective. European Journal of Political Research63 (1): 45–65.
27.
DavisFLWurthAH (2003) Voting Preferences and the Environment in the American Electorate: The Discussion Extended. Society & Natural Resources16 (8): 729–740.
28.
De MoorJDe VydtMUbaK, et al. (2021) New Kids on the Block: Taking Stock of the Recent Cycle of Climate Activism. Social Movement Studies20 (5): 619–625.
29.
De SioLWeberT (2014) Issue Yield: A Model of Party Strategy in Multidimensional Space. American Political Science Review108 (4): 870–885.
30.
De VriesCE (2007) Sleeping Giant: Fact or Fairytale? How European Integration Affects National Elections. European Union Politics8 (3): 363–385.
31.
De VriesCE (2010) EU Issue Voting: Asset or Liability? How European Integration Affects Parties’ Electoral Fortunes. European Union Politics11 (1): 89–117.
32.
De VriesCEHoboltSB (2012) When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs. European Union Politics13 (2): 246–268.
33.
De VriesCEHoboltSB (2020) Political Entrepreneurs. the Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
D’EcclesiisEALeviEPatriarcaF (2025) Exploring the Multifaceted Relationship between Environmental Attitudes and Political Voting. Ecological Economics230: 108518.
35.
DennisonJGeddesA (2019) A Rising Tide? The Salience of Immigration and the Rise of Anti-Immigration Political Parties in Western Europe. The Political Quarterly90 (1): 107–116.
36.
DicksonZPHoboltSB (2024) Going Against the Grain: Climate Change as a Wedge Issue for the Radical Right. Comparative Political Studies58 (8): 1733–1759.
37.
FabelMFlückigerMLudwigM, et al. (2022) The Power of Youth: Political Impacts of The “Fridays for Future” Movement. CESifo working paper no. 9742. Munich: Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute.
38.
FagerholmA (2016a) Why Do Political Parties Change Their Policy Positions? A Review. Political Studies Review14 (4): 501–511.
39.
FarstadFM (2018) What Explains Variation in Parties’ Climate Change Salience?Party Politics24 (6): 698–707.
40.
FisherSDKennyJPoortingaW, et al. (2022) The Politicisation of Climate Change Attitudes in Europe. Electoral Studies79: 102499.
41.
GemenisKKatsanidouAVasilopoulouS (2012) The Politics of Anti-Environmentalism: Positional Issue Framing. In: PSA Annual Conference Belfast, Northern Ireland.
42.
GrantZPTilleyJ (2019) Fertile Soil: Explaining Variation in the Success of Green Parties. West European Politics42 (3): 495–516.
43.
Green-PedersenC (2007) The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe. Political Studies55 (3): 607–628.
44.
Green-PedersenC (2019) The Reshaping of West European Party Politics: Agenda-Setting and Party Competition in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
GruberM (2025) Climate Politics in Populist Times: Climate Change Communication Strategies in Germany, Spain, and Austria. Oxford: Taylor & Francis, p. 242.
46.
GuberDL (2001) Voting Preferences and the Environment in the American Electorate. Society & Natural Resources14 (6): 455–469.
47.
GundersonJR (2023) Mapping Issue Salience Divergence in Europe from 1945 to the Present. Party Politics20 (3): 435–449.
48.
HanJHFinkeD (2022) “Voting Green in European Parliament Elections: Issue Voting in an Electoral Context. Journal of European Public Policy30 (12): 2764–2785.
49.
HinoA (2012) New Challenger Parties in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge.
50.
HoboltSBTilleyJ (2016) Fleeing the Centre: The Rise of Challenger Parties in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis. West European Politics39 (5): 971–991.
51.
HoboltSBDe VriesCE (2016) Public Support for European Integration. Annual Review of Political Science19: 413–432.
52.
HoffmannRMuttarakRPeiskerJ, et al. (2022) Climate Change Experiences Raise Environmental Concerns and Promote Green Voting. Nature Climate Change12 (2): 148–155.
53.
HolubFSchündelnM (2023) Pro-Environmental Voting When Climate Change Is Made Salient: Evidence from High-Resolution Flooding Data. PLOS Climate2 (8): e0000219.
54.
HoogheLMarksG (2018) Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy25 (1): 109–135.
55.
HoogheLMarksGWilsonCJ (2002) Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?Comparative Political Studies35 (8): 965–989.
56.
HutterSGrandeE (2014) Politicizing Europe in the National Electoral Arena.: A Comparative Analysis of Five West European Countries, 1970–2010. Journal of Common Market Studies52 (5): 1002–1018.
57.
HutterSKriesiH (2019) Politicizing Europe in Times of Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy26 (7): 996–1017.
58.
InglehartR (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
InglehartR (1977) The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
JollySBakkerRHoogheL, et al. (2022) Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999-2019. Electoral Studies75: 1–7.
61.
KennyJ (2021) The Evolution of Environmental Concern in Europe. In: FranzenAMaderS (eds) Research Handbook on Environmental Sociology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.79–96.
62.
KennyJLangsætherPE (2023) Environmentalism as an Independent Dimension of Political Preferences. European Journal of Political Research62 (4): 1031–1053.
63.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR, et al. (2006) Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared. European Journal of Political Research45 (6): 921–956.
64.
KulinJJohansson SeväIDunlapRE (2021) Nationalist Ideology, Rightwing Populism, and Public Views about Climate Change in Europe. Environmental Politics30 (7): 1111–1134.
65.
LichtinFVan der BrugWRekkerR (2023) Generational Replacement and Green Party Support in Western Europe. Electoral Studies83: 102602.
66.
LockwoodM (2018) Right-Wing Populism and the Climate Change Agenda: Exploring the Linkages. Environmental Politics27 (4): 712–732.
67.
LorenzoniIPidgeonNF (2006) Public Views on Climate Change: European and USA Perspectives. Climatic Change77: 73–95.
68.
MarquardtJLedererM (2022) Politicizing Climate Change in Times of Populism: An Introduction. Environmental Politics31 (5): 735–754.
69.
McCrightAMDunlapREMarquart-PyattST (2016) Political Ideology and Views about Climate Change in the European Union. Environmental Politics25 (2): 338–358.
70.
MannoniE (2025) Pro-environmental Voting: What It Is, How to Measure It, and Its Determinants among Contemporary European Voters. Parliamentary Affairs78 (1): 77–96.
71.
MeguidB (2005) Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review99 (3): 347–359.
72.
MeijersMJ (2017) Contagious Euroscepticism: The Impact of Eurosceptic Support on Mainstream Party Positions on European Integration. Party Politics23 (4): 413–423.
73.
MinkenbergM (2002) The Radical Right in Post-Socialist Central and Eastern Europe: Comparative Observations and Interpretations. East European Politics and Societies16 (2): 335–362.
74.
Müller-RommelF (1998) The New Challengers: Greens and Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe. European Review6 (2): 191–202.
75.
PappZ (2022) Environmental Attitudes, Environmental Problems and Party Choice. A Large-N Comparative Study. Political Geography97: 102652.
76.
PearsonMRüdigW (2020) The Greens in the 2019 European Elections. Environmental Politics29 (2): 336–343.
77.
PepermansYMaeseeleP (2016) The Politicization of Climate Change: Problem or Solution?Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change7 (4): 478–485.
78.
PirroA (2014) Populist Radical Right Parties in Central and Eastern Europe: The Different Context and Issues of the Prophets of the Patria. Government and Opposition49 (4): 600–629.
79.
PuleoLBraunDReinlAK, et al. (2024) Another Sleeping Giant? Environmental Issue Preferences in the 2019 European Parliament Elections. West European Politics48 (3): 507–533.
80.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine Second–Order National Elections–A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research8 (1): 3–44.
81.
RohrschneiderRMilesMR (2015) Representation Through Parties? Environmental Attitudes and Party Stances in Europe in 2013. Environmental Politics24 (4): 617–640.
82.
SartoriG (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
83.
SchattschneiderEE (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
84.
SchmittHHoboltSBVan der BrugW, et al. (2020) European Parliament Election Study 2019, Voter Study (ZA7581 Data File Version 1.0.0). Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
85.
SchwörerJ (2023) “Mainstream Parties and Global Warming: What Determines Parties” Engagement in Climate Protection?.’European Journal of Political Research63(1): 303–325.
86.
SpoonJ-JWilliamsCJ (2021) It’s the Economy, Stupid’: When New Politics Parties Take on Old Politics Issues. West European Politics44 (4): 802–824.
87.
SpoonJ-JWilliamsCJ (2022) Environmental Chauvinism? Explaining Issue Expansion among Non-mainstream Parties. Party Politics29 (6): 1077–1087.
88.
SpoonJ-JHoboltSBDe VriesC (2014) Going Green: Explaining Issue Competition on the Environment. European Journal of Political Research53 (2): 363–380.
89.
SpoonJ-JKlüverH (2015) Voter Polarisation and Party Responsiveness Why Parties Emphasise Divided Issues, but Remain Silent on Unified Issues. European Journal of Political Research54 (2): 343–362.
90.
TavaresAOAreiaNPMellettS, et al. (2020) The European Media Portrayal of Climate Change: Implications for the Social Mobilization Towards Climate Action. Sustainability12 (20): 8300.
91.
TranterBWesternM (2010) Overstating Value Change: Question Ordering in the Postmaterial Values Index. European Sociological Review26 (5): 571–583.
92.
TurnerJBaileyD (2022) ‘Ecobordering’: Casting Immigration Control as Environmental Protection. Environmental Politics31 (1): 110–131.
93.
Van der BrugWVan der EijkCFranklinM (2007) The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94.
WhitleySGNelsenBFGuthJL (2023) Explaining Green Party Support in the 2019 European Parliamentary Elections: A Test of Four Hypotheses. Society60: 413–425.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
