The present study seeks to identify factors associated with inmates and their incarceration that differentially affect their frequency of receiving visits from specific types of visitors. Findings reveal both demographic and prison experience characteristics as significant predictors of the number of visits received from specific types of visitors. More highly educated, female, White, and currently or formerly married inmates received a greater number of visits from specific types of visitors, as did inmates with fewer prior incarcerations and who were not serving time for a drug, violent, and sex offense conviction. Limitations, directions for future research, and implications are discussed.
BalesW. D.MearsD. P. (2008). Inmate social ties and the transition to society: Does visitation reduce recidivism?Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 45, 287-321.
2.
BermanA. H.LundbergU.KrookA. L.GyllenhammarC. (2004). Treating drug using prison inmates with auricular acupuncture: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 26, 95-102.
3.
BlockK. J. (1999). Bringing scouting to prison: Programs and challenges. The Prison Journal, 79, 269-283.
4.
Casey-AcevedoK.BakkenT. (2001). Effects of visitation on women in prison. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 25, 49-70.
5.
Casey-AcevedoK.BakkenT. (2002). Visiting women in prison: Who visits and who cares?Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34, 67-83.
6.
ChristianJ. (2005). Riding the bus: Barriers to prison visitation and family management strategies. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 31-48.
7.
CochranJ. C. (2012). The ties that bind or the ties that break: Examining the relationship between visitation and prisoner misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 433-440.
8.
ComfortM. L. (2003). In the tube at San Quentin: The “secondary prisonization” of women visiting inmates. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32, 77-107.
9.
ConnorD. P.TewksburyR. (2013). Examining prison wardens’ perceptions of inmates incarcerated for sex offenses. Corrections Today, 75, 60-61, 68.
10.
DerkzenD.GobeilR.GilenoJ. (2009). Visitation and post-release outcomes among federally-sentenced offenders. Ottawa, Ontario: Correctional Service of Canada.
11.
DuweG.ClarkV. (2013). Blessed be the social tie that binds: The effects of prison visitation on offender recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24, 271-296.
12.
FurstG. (2006). Prison-based animal programs: A national survey. The Prison Journal, 86, 407-430.
13.
GrinsteadO.FaigelesB.BancroftC.ZackB. (2001). The financial cost of maintaining relationships with incarcerated African American men: A survey of women prison visitors. Journal of African-American Men, 6, 59-69.
14.
HoltN.MillerD. (1972). Explorations in inmate-family relationships. Sacramento: California Department of Corrections.
15.
JiangS.Fisher-GiorlandoM.MoL. (2005). Social support and inmate rule violations: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 71-86.
16.
JonesR.SchmidT. (2000). Doing time: Prison experience and identity among first-time inmates. Stanford, CT: JAI Press.
17.
LochheadS. (1992). Prison visiting: Its place in the prison service. Social Policy & Administration, 26, 151-158.
18.
MartinM. (1997). Connected mothers: A follow-up study of incarcerated women and their children. Women & Criminal Justice, 8, 1-23.
19.
MearsD. P.CochranJ. C.SiennickS. E.BalesW. D. (2012). Prison visitation and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 29, 888-918.
20.
MonahanK. C.GoldweberA.CauffmanE. (2011). The effects of visitation on incarcerated juvenile offenders: How contact with the outside impacts adjustment on the inside. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 143-151.
21.
Prison Visitation Project. (1994). Needs assessment of children whose parents are incarcerated. Richmond: Virginia Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation.
22.
RobbersM. L. P. (2009). Lifers on the outside: Sex offenders and disintegrative shaming. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 5-28.
23.
SchaferN. E. (1991). Prison visiting policies and practices. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35, 263-275.
24.
SchaferN. E. (1994). Exploring the link between visits and parole success: A survey of prison visitors. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 38, 17-32.
25.
SchwaebeC. (2005). Learning to pass: Sex offenders’ strategies for establishing a viable identity in the prison general population. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 614-625.
26.
Tennessee Department of Corrections: Planning and Research Section. (1995). The children and families of incarcerated felons: A status report and demographic inquiry. Nashville: Author.
27.
TewksburyR. (2012). Stigmatization of sex offenders. Deviant Behavior, 33, 606-623.
28.
TewksburyR.ConnorD. P. (2012a). Incarcerated sex offenders’ perceptions of family relationships: Previous experiences and future expectations. Western Criminology Review, 13, 25-35.
29.
TewksburyR.ConnorD. P. (2012b). Inmates who receive visits in prison: Exploring factors that predict. Federal Probation, 76, 43-46.
30.
TewksburyR.ConnorD. P. (2014). From troubling actions to troubled lives: Sex offender registration and notification. In GubriumJ. F.JärvinenM. (Eds.), Turning troubles into problems: Clientization in human services (pp. 211-227). London: Routledge.
31.
TewksburyR.ConnorD. P.DenneyA. S. (2014). Disciplinary infractions behind bars: An exploration of importation and deprivation theories. Criminal Justice Review, 39, 201-218.
32.
TewksburyR.DeMicheleM. (2005). Going to prison: A prison visitation program. The Prison Journal, 85, 292-310.
33.
TewksburyR.LeesM. B. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 26, 309-334.
34.
TewksburyR.LeesM. B. (2007). Perceptions of punishment: How registered sex offenders view registries. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 380-407.
35.
WaldramJ. B. (2012). Hound pound narrative: Sexual offender habilitation and the anthropology of therapeutic intervention. Berkley: University of California Press.
