Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Generativity, defined as the actions of an individual or group that enable others to care in meaningful ways for themselves and their significant others, has become an important concept for thinking about desistance from crime. In this article, we explore opportunities for prison officers in metropolitan and regional South Australia to model and/or engage in generative conduct. We find the emergence of generativity to be idiosyncratic—linked to individual officer’s capacities to resist the dominant “us” versus “them” culture—and to be often thwarted by a fatalistic outlook. Correctional policy implications are discussed.

Keywords

prison officers generativity officer culture care control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Prisoners in Australia (4517.0, reissue), Canberra.

Brough

Williams

(2007). Managing occupational stress in a high-risk industry: Measuring the job demands of correctional officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 555-567.

Brown

Ross

(2010). Mentoring, social capital and desistance: A study of women released from prison. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43, 31-50.

Carlson

Thomas

(2006). Burnout among prison caseworkers and corrections officers. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43, 19-34.

Carson

Gilmore

Perry

Gronhaug

(2001). Qualitative marketing research. London, England: SAGE.

Clemmer

(1940). The prison community. New York: Rinehart.

Crawley

(2004). Emotion and performance: Prison officers and the presentation of self in prisons. Punishment & Society, 6, 411-427.

Crewe

(2011a). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment & Society, 13, 509-529.

Crewe

(2011b). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff-prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 455-468.

10.

Currie

(2004). The road to whatever. New York, NY: Henry Holt.

11.

Department for Correctional Services. (2014). Annual report 2012-2013. Retrieved from http://www.corrections.sa.gov.au/reports-and-media/annual-reports

12.

Department of Employment. (2012). Prison officers: Age profile. Retrieved from http://joboutlook.gov.au/occupation.aspx?search=&tab=stats&cluster=&code=4421&graph=AG

13.

de St. Aubin

McAdams

D. P.

Kim

(Eds.). (2004). The generative society: Caring for future generations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

14.

Deuchar

(2009). Gangs, marginalised youth and social capital. Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham.

15.

Dey

(2007). Ground theory. In Searle

Gobo

Gubrium

Silverman

(Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 80-94). London, England: SAGE.

16.

DuBois

D. L.

Holloway

B. E.

Valentine

J. C.

Cooper

(2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 157-197.

17.

Erikson

E. H.

(1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

18.

Erikson

E. H.

(1982). The life cycle completed: A review. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

19.

Farkas

(1999). Correctional officer attitudes towards inmates and working with inmates in a “get tough” era. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 495-506.

20.

Finn

(1998). Correctional officer stress: A cause for concern and additional help. Federal Probation, 62, 65-74.

21.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

22.

Goffman

(1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 48, 1-17.

23.

Goldsmith

Halsey

Groves

(2016). Tackling correctional corruption. London, UK: Palgrave.

24.

Gordon

(2006). Correctional officer control ideology: Implications for understanding a system. Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 225-239.

25.

Griffin

(2001). Job satisfaction among detention officers: Assessing the relative contribution of organizational climate variables. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 219-232.

26.

Halsey

(2008). Risking desistance: Respect and responsibility in custodial and post-release contexts. In Carlen

(Ed.), Imaginary penalities (pp. 218-251). Cullompton, UK: Willan.

27.

Halsey

Deegan

(2012). Father and son: Two generations through prison. Punishment & Society, 14, 338-367.

28.

Halsey

Deegan

(2015). Young offenders: Crime, prison and struggles for desistance. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

29.

Halsey

Harris

(2011). Prisoner futures: Sensing the signs of generativity. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44, 74-93.

30.

Healy

O’Donnell

(2008). Calling time on crime: Motivation, generativity and agency in Irish probationers. Probation Journal, 55, 25-38.

31.

Hepburn

Albonetti

(1980). Role conflict in correctional institutions: An empirical examination of the treatment-custody dilemma among correctional staff. Criminology, 17, 445-459.

32.

Irwin

(1970). The felon. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

33.

Irwin

Cressey

(1962). Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10, 142-155.

34.

Jewkes

(2005). “Doing” masculinity as an adaptation to imprisonment. Men & Masculinities, 8, 44-63.

35.

Johnson

Price

(1981). The complete correctional officer: Human service and the human environment of prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 343-373.

36.

Kotre

(1984). Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

37.

Lambert

E. G.

Barton-Bellessa

S. M.

Hogan

N. L.

(2014). The association between correctional orientation and organizational citizenship behaviors among correctional staff. International Journal of Comparative Criminology, 58, 953-974.

38.

Lambert

E. G.

Griffin

M. L.

Hogan

N. L.

Kelley

(2015). The ties that bind: Correctional orientation, absenteeism, and turnover intent. The Prison Journal, 95, 135-156.

39.

Lambert

E. G.

Hogan

N. L.

Altheimer

Jiang

Stevenson

M. T.

(2010). The relationship between burnout and support for punishment and treatment: A preliminary examination. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 1004-1022.

40.

Lerman

Page

(2012). The state of the job: An embedded work role perspective on prison officer attitudes. Punishment & Society, 14, 503-529.

41.

Lieblich

Tuval-Mashiach

Zilber

(1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

42.

Liebling

(2000). Prison officers, policing and the use of discretion. Theoretical Criminology, 4, 333-357.

43.

Liebling

(2004). Prisons and their moral performance: A study of values, quality, and prison life. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

44.

Liebling

(2008). Why prison staff culture matters. In Byre

J. M.

Hummer

Taxman

F. S.

(Eds.), The culture of prison violence (pp. 105-122). Boston, MA: Pearson.

45.

Liebling

(2011). Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers: Legitimacy and authority revisited. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 484-499.

46.

Liebling

Maruna

(Eds.). (2006). The effects of imprisonment. Cullompton, UK: Willan.

47.

Liebling

Price

Shefer

(2011). The prison officer. London, England: Routledge.

48.

Martin

J. L.

Lichtenstein

Jenkot

R. B.

Forde

D. R.

(2012). “They can take us over any time they want”: Correctional Officers’ Responses to Prison Crowding. The Prison Journal, 92, 88-105.

49.

Martinez

A. R.

(1997). Corrections officer: The “other” prisoner. The Keeper’s Voice, 18, 8-11.

50.

Maruna

LeBel

T. P.

Lanier

C. S.

(2004). Generativity behind bars: Some ‘redemptive truth’ about prison society. In De

Aubin

St.

McAdams

D. P.

Kim

(Eds.), The generative society (pp. 131-151). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

51.

Maruna

Mann

(2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 155-177.

52.

McAdams

D. P.

de St. Aubin

(Eds.). (1998). Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

53.

McAdams

D. P.

St.

Aubin

Logan

R. L.

(1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 8, 221-230.

54.

McAdams

D. P.

Hart

H. M.

Maruna

(1998). The anatomy of generativity. In McAdams

D. P.

de St. Aubin

(Eds.), Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation (pp. 7-44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

55.

McAdams

D. P.

Logan

R. L.

(2004). What is generativity? In de St. Aubin

McAdams

D. P.

Kim

(Eds.), The generative society (pp. 15-31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

56.

McNeill

Maruna

(2008). Giving up and giving back: Desistance, generativity and social work with offenders. In McIvor

Raynor

(Eds.), Developments in social work with offenders (pp. 224-339). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.

57.

Merriam

(1983). Mentors and protégés: A critical review of the literature. Adult Education Quarterly, 33, 161-173.

58.

Misis

Kim

Cheeseman

Hogan

N. L.

Lambert

E. G.

(2013). The impact of correctional officer perceptions of inmates on job stress. SAGE Open, 3, 1-13.

59.

Morgan

Van Haveren

Pearson

(2002). Correctional officer burnout: Further analyses. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 144-160.

60.

Nylander

Lindberg

Bruhn

(2011). Emotional labour and emotional strain among Swedish prison officers. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 469-483.

61.

Rhodes

J. E.

(1994). Older and wiser: Mentoring relationships in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Primary Prevention, 14, 187-196.

62.

Rhodes

J. E.

DuBois

D. L.

(2008). Mentoring relationships and programs for youth. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 254-258.

63.

Rhodes

L. A.

(2004). Total confinement: Madness and reason in the maximum security prison. Berkeley: University of California Press.

64.

Robinson

Porporino

Simourd

(1993). The influence of career orientation on support for rehabilitation among correctional staff. The Prison Journal, 73, 162-177.

65.

Ryan

G. W.

Bernard

H. R.

(2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 85-109.

66.

Sandford

R. A.

Armour

K. M.

Washington

P. C.

(2006). Re-engaging disaffected youth through physical activity programmes. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 251-271.

67.

Shamir

Drory

(1981). Some correlates of prison guards’ beliefs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 233-249.

68.

Short

Cooper

Shaw

Kenning

Abel

Chew-Graham

(2009). Custody vs care: Attitudes of staff to self-harm in women prisoners. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 408-426.

69.

Strauss

Corbin

(1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

70.

Sykes

(1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

71.

Tait

(2008). Care and the prison officer: Beyond “turnkeys” and “care bears.” Prison Service Journal, 180, 3-11.

72.

Tait

(2011). A typology of prison officer approaches to care. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 440-454.

73.

Thomas

Petersen

(1977). Prison organization and inmate subcultures. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

74.

Tittle

(1972). Society of subordinates: Inmate organization in a narcotic hospital. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

75.

Ward

Maruna

(2007). Rehabilitation. London, England: Routledge.

76.

Wright

(2004). Care as the “heart” of prison teaching. The Journal of Correctional Education, 55, 191-209.