The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ([IDEA] 2004; IDEA Amendments 1997) is a civil rights–based law designed to protect the rights of students with disabilities in U.S. schools. However, decades after the initial passage of IDEA, racial inequity in special education classifications, placements, and suspensions are evident. In this article, we focus on understanding how racial discipline disparities in special education outcomes relate to IDEA remedies designed to address problem behaviors. We qualitatively examine how educators interpret and respond to citations for racial discipline disproportionality via IDEA at both the district and the school level in a suburban locale. We find that educators interpret the inequity in ways that neutralize the racialized implications of the citation, which in turn affects how they respond to the citation. These interpretations contribute to symbolic and race-evasive IDEA compliance responses. The resulting bureaucratic and organizational structures associated with IDEA implementation become a mechanism through which the visibility of race and racialization processes are erased and muted through acts of policy compliance. Thus, the logic of compliance surrounding IDEA administration serves as a reproductive social force that sustains practices that do not disrupt locally occurring racialized inequities.
AlbrechtSusan FreadSkibaRussell J.LosenDaniel J.ChungChoong-GeunMiddelbergLaura. 2012. “Federal Policy on Disproportionality in Special Education: Is It Moving Us Forward?”Journal of Disability Policy Studies23(1):14–25.
2.
ArtilesAlfredo J.2011. “Toward an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Educational Equity and Difference: The Case of the Racialization of Ability.” Educational Researcher40(9):431–45.
3.
ArtilesAlfredo J.2019. “Re-envisioning Equity Research: Disability Identification Disparities as a Case in Point.” Educational Researcher48:325–35.
4.
ArtilesAlfredo J.2020. “Interrupting Ideology-Ontology Circuits in Educational Equity Research: (Re)framing the Racialization of Disability.” Virtual event. School of Education and Human Development, Florida International University, Miami, November.
5.
ArtilesAlfredo J.CaballerosMarta Z.2020. “Shades of Rights and the Dual Nature of Disability: Toward a Cultural Understanding of Inclusion.” Highlighted session at the annual meeting of the Comparative & International Education Society, Miami, FL, March.
6.
ArumRichard. 2000. “Schools and Communities: Ecological and Institutional Dimensions.” Annual Review of Sociology26(1):395–418.
7.
BalAydinAfacanKemalCakirHalil Ibrahim. 2018. “Culturally Responsive School Discipline: Implementing Learning Lab at a High School for Systemic Transformation.” American Educational Research Journal55(5):1007–50.
8.
BloodErikaNeelRichard S.2007. “From FBA to Implementation: A Look at What Is Actually Being Delivered.” Education and Treatment of Children30(4):67–80.
9.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 2006. Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
BradshawCatherine P.MitchellMary M.LeafPhilip J.2010. “Examining the Effects of Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on Student Outcomes: Results from a Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial in Elementary Schools.” Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions12(3):133–48.
11.
BradyKevin P.RussoCharles J.DieterichCynthia A.OsborneAllan G.Jr. 2019. Legal Issues in Special Education: Principles, Policies, and Practices. London, England: Routledge.
12.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
13.
ByronReginald A.RoscignoVincent J.2019. “Bureaucracy, Discrimination, and the Racialized Character of Organizational Life.” Pp. 151–70 in Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process, edited by WootenM. E.Bingley, UK: Emerald.
14.
DiamondJohn B.LewisAmanda E.2019. “Race and Discipline at a Racially Mixed High School: Status, Capital, and the Practice of Organizational Routines.” Urban Education54(6):831–59.
15.
EdelmanLauren B.2016. Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
EdelmanLauren B.KriegerLinda H.EliasonScott R.AlbistonCatherine R.MellemaVirginia. 2011. “When Organizations Rule: Judicial Deference to Institutionalized Employment Structures.” American Journal of Sociology117(3):888–954.
17.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act, 20 U.S.C. §§1400-1485 (Supp. IV 1986). (1975).
18.
FabeloTonyThompsonMichael D.PlotkinMarthaCarmichaelDottieMarchbanksMiner P.BoothEric A.2011. Breaking Schools’ Rules: A Statewide Study of How School Discipline Relates to Students’ Success and Juvenile Justice Involvement. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.
19.
FergusEdward. 2016. Solving Disproportionality and Achieving Equity: A Leader’s Guide to Using Data to Change Hearts and Minds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
20.
FreidusA.2020. “‘Problem Children’ and ‘Children with Problems’: Discipling and Innocence in a Gentrifying Elementary School.” Harvard Educational Review90(4):550–72.
21.
GregoryAnneSkibaRussell J.NogueraPedro A.2010. “The Achievement Gap and the Discipline Gap: Two Sides of the Same Coin?”Educational Researcher39(1):59–68.
22.
HarryBethKlingnerJanette. 2014. Why Are So Many Minority Students in Special Education?New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §1400 (2004).
24.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq. (1997).
25.
IrbyDecoteau Jermaine. 2018. “Mo’data, Mo’problems: Making Sense of Racial Discipline Disparities in a Large Diversifying Suburban High School.” Educational Administration Quarterly54(5):693–722.
26.
LipskyMichael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage.
27.
LosenDaniel J.2014. Closing the School Discipline Gap: Equitable Remedies for Excessive Exclusion. New York: Teachers College Press.
OmiMichaelWinantHoward. 2014. Racial Formation in the United States. London, England: Routledge.
34.
Ong-DeanColin. 2009. Distinguishing Disability: Parents, Privilege, and Special Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
RayVictor. 2019. “A Theory of Racialized Organizations.” American Sociological Review84(1):26–53.
36.
RossThomas. 1990. “The Rhetorical Tapestry of Race: White Innocence and Black Abstraction.” William and Mary Law Review32(1):1–40.
37.
ScottTerrance M.CooperJustin T.2017. “Functional Behavior Assessment and Function-Based Intervention Planning: Considering the Simple Logic of the Process.” Beyond Behavior26(3):101–104.
38.
Source Anonymized.2016.
39.
StraussAnselmCorbinJuliet. 1994. “Grounded Theory Methodology.” Handbook of Qualitative Research17:273–85.
40.
SuchmanMark C.EdelmanLauren B.1996. “Legal Rational Myths: The New Institutionalism and the Law and Society Tradition.” Law & Social Inquiry21(4):903–41.
41.
SullivanAmanda L.Van NormanEthan R.KlingbeilDavid A.2014. “Exclusionary Discipline of Students with Disabilities: Student and School Characteristics Predicting Suspension.” Remedial and Special Education35(4):199–210.
42.
TeferaA. A.FischmanG. E.2020. “How and Why Context Matters in the Study of Racial Disproportionality in Special Education: Toward a Critical Disability Education Policy Approach.” Equity and Excellence in Education53(4):434–49.
43.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement, Office of Non-Public Education. 2011. “The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Provisions Related to Children with Disabilities Enrolled by Their Parents in Private Schools.”https://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/speced/privateschools/idea.pdf.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2013. “Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Standards Needed to Improve Identification of Racial and Ethnic Overrepresentation in Special Education.”www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-137.
47.
VoulgaridesCatherine Kramarczuk. 2018. Does Compliance Matter in Special Education? IDEA and the Hidden Inequities of Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
48.
VoulgaridesCatherine Kramarczuk. 2020. “Leadership and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Is Compliance with IDEA a Path toward Educational Equity?”Journal of Education Human Resources38(2):238–57.
49.
VoulgaridesCatherine KramarczukAylwardAlexandraNogueraPedro A.2013. “Elusive Quest for Equity: An Analysis of How Contextual Factors Contribute to the Likelihood of School Districts Being Legally Cited for Racial Disproportionality in Special Education.” Journal of Law and Society15:241–74.
50.
VoulgaridesCatherine KramarczukFergusEdwardKing ThoriusKathleen A.2017. “Pursuing Equity: Disproportionality in Special Education and the Reframing of Technical Solutions to Address Systemic Inequities.” Review of Research in Education41(1):61–87.
ZirkelPerry A.2011. “State Special Education Laws for Functional Behavioral Assessment and Behavior Intervention Plans.” Behavioral Disorders36(4):262–78.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
