This year-long ethnographic study explored the occupational aspirations and informal educational experiences of 25 diverse homeless adolescents who found social welfare assistance through Empower, a nonprofit organization. Using organizational habitus and intersectionality as theoretical frameworks and constant comparative analysis, I found that Empower staff tailored educational programming and economic opportunities based on raced and gendered stereotyped notions of young people. Because of their precarious social positioning and the intersection of multiple marginalized identities, the Black adolescents were most positioned to obtain occupations that reproduce their ascribed social status, while the White youth were poised to improve their socioeconomic conditions.
AkomA. A. (2006). The racial dimensions of social capital: Toward a new understanding of youth empowerment and community organizing in America’s urban core. In GinwrightS.NogueraP.CammarotaJ. (Eds.), Beyond resistance: Youth activism and community change (pp. 81-92). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
2.
Aviles de BradleyA. (2015). Homeless educational policy: Exploring a racialized discourse through a critical race theory lens. Urban Education, 50, 839-869.
3.
BaldridgeB. J. (2014). Relocating the deficit: Reimagining Black youth in neoliberal times. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 440-472.
4.
BassukE.MurphyC.CoupeN. T.KenneyR. R.BeachC. A. (2011). America’s youngest outcasts: 2010. Needham, MA: The National Center on Family Homelessness.
5.
BealS. J.CrockettL. J. (2010). Adolescents’ occupational and educational aspirations and expectations: Links to high school activities and adult educational attainment. Developmental Psychology, 46, 258-265.
6.
BohonS. A.JohnsonM. K.GormanB. K. (2006). College aspirations and expectations among Latino adolescents in the United States. Social Problems, 53, 207-225.
7.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
CohenD.CrabtreeB. (2006). Semi-structured interviews (Qualitative research guidelines project). Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
9.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139-168.
10.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1300.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
DiamondJ. B.RandolphA.SpillaneJ. P. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35, 75-98.
13.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
FelicianoC.RumbautR. G. (2005). Gendered paths: Educational and occupational expectations and outcomes among adult children of immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 1087-1118.
15.
GillbornD. (2015). Intersectionality, critical race theory, and the primacy of racism: Race, class, gender, and disability in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 277-287.
16.
GinwrightS. A. (2007). Black youth activism and the role of critical social capital in Black community organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 403-418.
17.
HallerA. O.PortesA. (1973). Status attainment processes. Sociology of Education, 46, 51-91.
Hines-DatiriD.Carter AndrewsD. J. (2017). The effects of zero tolerance policies on Black girls: Using critical race feminism and figured worlds to examine school discipline. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085917690204
20.
HorvatE. M.AntonioA. L. (1999). “Hey, those shoes are out of uniform”: African American girls in an elite high school and the importance of habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 30, 317-342.
21.
JulianelleP. F.FoscarinisM. (2003). Responding to the school mobility of children and youth experiencing homelessness: The McKinney-Vento Act and beyond. Journal of Negro Education, 72, 39-54.
22.
KaoG.ThompsonJ. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 417-442.
23.
KerckhoffA. C. (1976). The status attainment process: Socialization or allocation?Social Forces, 55, 368-381.
24.
LeeJ. O.HillK. G.HawkinsJ. D. (2012). The role of educational aspirations and expectations in the discontinuity of intergenerational low-income status. Social Work Research, 36, 141-151.
25.
LeeV. E.SmithJ. B. (2001). Restructuring high schools for equity and excellence: What works?New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
26.
McDonaldK. B.Harvey WingfieldA. M. (2008). Visibility blues: The paradox of institutional racism. Sociological Spectrum, 29, 28-50.
27.
MelvinA. (2010). The creative symbiosis of composer and performer (An examination of collaborative practice in partially improvised works). Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University School of Arts PhD Theses, UK.
28.
MillerP. M. (2011). A critical analysis of the research on student homelessness. Review of Educational Research, 81, 308-337.
29.
MillerP. M. (2015). Families’ experiences in different homeless and highly mobile settings: Implications for school and community practice. Education and Urban Society, 47, 3-32.
30.
MilnerH. R.IV. (2011). But good intentions are not enough: Doing what’s necessary to teach for diversity. In LandsmanJ.LewisC. W. (Eds.), White teachers/diverse classrooms (pp. 56-73). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
31.
MilnerH. R.IVMurrayI. E.FarindeA. A.Delale-O’ConnorL. (2015). Outside of school matters: What we need to know in urban environments. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48, 529-548.
32.
National Center for Homeless Education. (2015). Education for homeless children and youth program analysis of data. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://center.serve.org/nche/pr/data_comp.php
33.
ParisD. (2010). Texting identities: Lessons for classrooms from multiethnic youth space. English Education, 42, 278-292.
34.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
PetersB. M. (2010). Emo gay boys and subculture: Postpunk queer youth and (re)thinking images of masculinity. Journal of LGBT Youth, 7, 129-146.
36.
PhillipovM. (2009). “Just emotional people”? Emo culture and the anxieties of disclosure. M/C Journal, 12(5), 1-7.
37.
RumbergerR. W. (2003). The causes and consequences of student mobility. The Journal of Negro Education, 72, 6-21.
38.
SewellW. H.HallerA. O.OhlendorfG. W. (1970). The educational and early occupational status attainment process: Replication and revision. American Sociological Review, 35, 1014-1027.
39.
StrayhornT. L. (2009). Different folks, different hopes: The educational aspirations of Black males in urban, suburban, and rural high schools. Urban Education, 44, 710-731.
40.
TateW. F.HamiltonC.JonesB. D.RoberstonW. B.MacranderA.SchultzL.Thome-WallingtonE. (2014). Serving vulnerable children and youth in the urban context. In MilnerH.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 3-23). New York, NY: Routledge.
WinnM. T.UbilesJ. R. (2011). Worthy witnessing. In BallA.TysonC. (Eds.), Studying diversity in teacher education (pp. 295-308). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
