With the expansion of online instruction in K-12 education, how and what is taught in a single course has the potential to affect the learning of thousands of students. Our mixed method study applies a critical lens to examine the extent to which four widely used online high school courses are culturally relevant and responsive. Online lessons reflected a culture of power, emphasizing normative cultural narratives, retreating to symbolic use versus application, and presenting neoliberal ideologies as fact. We end with a discussion of how systems can be leveraged to improve the educational experiences provided to students enrolled online.
AhnJ.McEachinA. (2017). Student enrollment patterns and achievement in Ohio’s online charter schools. Educational Researcher, 46(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17692999
2.
AppleM. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18(1), 12–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803260022
3.
AppleM. W. (2018). Ideology and curriculum (4th ed). Routledge.
4.
AppleM. W.AuW.GandinL. A. (2009). Mapping critical education. In AppleM. W.AuW.GandinL. A. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education. (pp. 3–19). Routledge.
5.
AronsonB.LaughterJ. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
6.
AuW. (2012). Critical curriculum studies: Education, consciousness, and the politics of knowing. Routledge.
7.
BakiaM.ShearL.ToyamaY.LasseterA. (2012). Understanding the implications of online learning for educational productivity. U.S. Department of Education.
8.
BanksJ. A. (1993). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. Review of Research in Education19(1) 3–49. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X019001003
9.
BenjaminR. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Polity Press.
10.
BondyE.HambacherE.MurphyA. S.WolkenhauerR.KrellD. (2015). Developing critical social justice literacy in an online seminar. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1025652
11.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
12.
BoningerF.MolnarA.MurrayK. (2017). Asleep at the switch: Schoolhouse commercialism, student privacy, and the failure of policymaking. National Education Policy Center.
13.
BowlesS.GintisH. (1976/2011). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and contradictions of economic life. Haymarket Books.
14.
BurchP.GoodA. (2014). Equal scrutiny: Privatization and accountability in digital education. Harvard Education Press.
15.
CammarotaJ.RomeroA. (2009). The social justice education project: A critically compassionate intellectualism for Chicana/o students. In AyersW.QuinnT.StovallD. (Eds.), Handbook of social justice in education (pp.465–476). Erlbaum.
ClarkK. F. (2017). Investigating the effects of culturally relevant texts on African American struggling readers’ progress. Teachers College Record, 119(5), 1–30.
18.
Darling-AduanaJ. (2020). High school student experiences and learning in online courses: Implications for educational equity and the future of learning (Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1803/10101
19.
Darling-AduanaJ.GoodA.HeinrichC. J. (2019). Mapping the inequity implications of help-seeking in online credit-recovery classrooms. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40.
20.
DeeT. S.PennerE. K. (2017). The causal effects of cultural relevance: Evidence from an ethnic studies curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 127–166. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216677002
21.
DeeT. S.PennerE. K. (2019). My brother’s keeper? The impact of targeted educational supports (CEPA Working Paper No.19-07). Retrieved from Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis. http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp19-07.
22.
DelpitL. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the curriculum. The New Press.
23.
FiedlerC. R.ChiangB.Van HarenB.JorgensenJ.HalbergSBoresonL. (2008). Culturally responsive practices in schools: A checklist to address disproportionality in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(5), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990804000507
24.
FryeBButtonL.KellyC.ButtonG. (2010). Preservice teachers’ self-perceptions and attitudes toward culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education, 5(1), 5.
25.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
26.
GayG. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching principles, practices, and effects. In Milner IVH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 353–372). Routledge.
27.
GeminB.PapeL.VashawL.WatsonJ. (2015). Keeping pace with k-12 digital learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Evergreen Education Group.
GrinerA. C.StewartM. L. (2013). Addressing the achievement gap and disproportionality through the use of culturally responsive teaching practices. Urban Education, 48(4), 585–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912456847
30.
GutsteinE. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. Taylor & Francis.
31.
HeinrichC. J.Darling-AduanaJ.GoodA.ChengH. (2019). A look inside online educational settings in high school: Promise and pitfalls for improving educational opportunities and outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2147–2188.
32.
HeppenJ. B.SorensenN.AllensworthE.WaltersK.RicklesJ.TaylorS. S.MichelmanV. (2017). The struggle to pass algebra: Online vs. face-to-face credit recovery for at-risk urban students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1168500
33.
Hipolito-DelgadoC. P.ZionS. (2017). Igniting the fire within marginalized youth: The role of critical civic inquiry in fostering ethnic identity and civic self-efficacy. Urban Education, 52(6), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915574524
34.
HsiaoY. (2015). The culturally responsive teacher preparedness scale: An exploratory study. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 8(4), 241–250.
35.
KarpM. J. M.BorkR. J. H. (2014). “They never told me what to expect, so I didn’t know what to do:” Defining and clarifying the role of a community college student. Teachers College Record, 116(5), 1–40.
36.
KohliR.PizarroM.NevárezA. (2017). The “new racism” of K–12 schools: Centering critical research on racism. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 182–202.
37.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
LanglieM. L. (2008). The effect of culturally relevant pedagogy on the mathematics achievement of Black and Hispanic high school students (Doctoral dissertation). Northeastern University.
40.
LaughterJ. C.AdamsA. D. (2012). Culturally relevant science teaching in middle school. Urban Education, 47(6), 1106–1134.
41.
LeeC. D. (2007). Culture, literacy, and learning. Teachers College Press.
42.
LipmanP. (2013). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. Taylor and Francis.
43.
MartinD. B. (2010). Liberating the production of knowledge about African American children and mathematics. In MartinD. B. (Ed.), Mathematics teaching, learning, and liberation in the lives of black children (pp. 3–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
McLarenP. (2015). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Routledge.
MilnerIVH. R.LomoteyK. (2014). Introduction. In Milner IVH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. xv-xxiii). Routledge.
48.
MolnarA. (2013). School commercialism: From democratic ideal to market commodity. Routledge.
49.
Morales-DoyleD. (2017). Justice-centered science pedagogy: A catalyst for academic achievement and social transformation. Science Education, 101(6), 1034–1060.
50.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
51.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
52.
RyanC.LewisJ. M. (2017). Computer and internet use in 2015: American community survey reports. U.S. Census Bureau.
ShevalierR.McKenzieB. A. (2012). Culturally responsive teaching as an ethics- and care-based approach to urban education. Urban Education, 47(6), 1086–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912441483
55.
SiwatuK. O. (2007). Preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1086–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.011
56.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
57.
TappanM. B. (2006). Reframing internalized oppression and internalized domination: From the psychological to the sociocultural. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2115–2144.
58.
UkpokoduO. N. (2008). Teachers’ reflections on pedagogies that enhance learning in an online course on teaching for equity and social justice. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(3), 227–255.
