The Tiebout hypothesis has stimulated 50 years of research into the relationship between residential location and local taxes and services. One line of research has focused on socioeconomic homogeneity as an indicator of Tiebout sorting. I argue that spatial dependence of socioeconomic variables confounds attempts to attribute sorting to Tiebout processes. Socioeconomic sorting is investigated in Queens and Nassau Counties, NY, one a jurisdictionally unified central city, the other a jurisdictionally fragmented suburban county. Socioeconomic differences between neighbouring census tracts are quantified throughout the study area and regressed on variables representing general purpose local governments and school districts. There is strong evidence of income sorting across small suburban municipalities, while the evidence of income sorting across school districts is ambiguous. I conclude that income sorting may not be as important at the school district level as generally believed, and previous research may have misattributed the political scale of household choice.
BayerPFerreiraFMcMillanR (2007) A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w13236.
2.
BickersKEngstromRN (2006) Tiebout sorting in metropolitan areas. Review of Policy Research23(6): 1181–1198.
3.
BickersKNSteinRM (1998) The microfoundations of the Tiebout model. Urban Affairs Review34(1): 76–93.
4.
BlackSE (1999) Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. The Quarterly Journal of Economics114(2): 577–599.
5.
BuckleyJSchneiderM (2006) School choice, parental information, and Tiebout sorting: Evidence from Washington, DC. In: FischelWA (ed.) The Tiebout Model at Fifty: Essays in Public Economics in Honor of Wallace Oates. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 101–122.
6.
DeMersMN (2000) Fundamentals of Geographic Information Systems. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7.
DowdingKJohnP (1994) Tiebout: A survey of the empirical literature. Urban Studies31(4/5): 767–797.
8.
EbertsRWGronbergTJ (1981) Jurisdictional homogeneity and the Tiebout hypothesis. Journal of Urban Economics10(2): 227–239.
9.
ESRI (2004) US Counties. Data and Maps for ArcGIS DVD.
FischelWA (2009) Making the Grade: The Economic Evolution of American School Districts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
FisherRWassmerR (1998) Economic influences on the structure of local government in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Urban Economics43(3): 444–471.
13.
GandelmanNPianiGFerreZ (2012) Neighborhood determinants of quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies13(3): 547–563.
14.
HachadoorianLH (2011) Tiebout Sorting and Jurisdictional Homogeneity: Empirical Validity and Ethical Implications. City University of New York. Available at: http://gradworks.umi.com/34/69/3469863.html.
15.
HamiltonBW (1975) Zoning and property taxation in a system of local governments. Urban Studies12: 205–211.
16.
HamiltonLSGuinK (2005) Understanding how families choose schools. In: BettsJRLovelessT (eds) Getting Choice Right: Ensuring Equity and Efficiency in Education Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 40–60.
17.
HanlonBShortJRVicinoTJ (2009) Cities and Suburbs: New Metropolitan Realities in the US. Oxford: Routledge.
18.
HeikkilaEJ (1996) Are municipalities Tieboutian clubs?Regional Science and Urban Economics26(2): 203–226.
19.
InmanRP (1979) The fiscal performance of local governments: An interpretive review. In: MieszkowskiPStraszheimM (eds) Current Issues in Urban Economics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 270–321.
20.
JacksonKT (1985) Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
KaplanDHHollowaySR (1998) Segregation in Cities. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
22.
LynchAKRasmussenDW (2004) Proximity, neighbourhood and the efficacy of exclusion. Urban Studies41(2): 285–298.
23.
MieszkowskiPMMillsES (1993) The causes of metropolitan suburbanization. Journal of Economic Perspectives7(3): 135–147.
24.
MorseJF (2007) A Level Playing Field: School Finance in the Northeast. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
25.
NechybaTJ (2003) School finance, spatial income segregation, and the nature of communities. Journal of Urban Economics54(1): 61–88.
New York State Office of Cyber Security & Critical Infrastructure Coordination (NYS CSCIC) (2007) New York State Civil Boundaries. Albany, NY: New York State Office of Cyber Security & Critical Infrastructure Coordination.
31.
New York State Office of Real Property Services (NYS ORPS) (2001) School Districts of New York State. Albany, NY: New York State Office of Real Property Services.
32.
OrfieldM (1997) Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for Community and Stability. Washington, DC, Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution Press; Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
33.
OrfieldM (2002) American Metropolitics: The New Suburban Reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
34.
PackHPackJR (1977) Metropolitan fragmentation and suburban homogeneity. Urban Studies14(2): 191–201.
35.
PermentierMvan HamMBoltG (2009) Neighbourhood reputation and the intention to leave the neighbourhood. Environment and Planning A41(9): 2162–2180.
36.
RawlsJ (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
37.
RuskD (2003) Cities Without Suburbs: A Census 2000 Update. Washington, DC; Baltimore, MD: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; Distributed by Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
SampsonRJ (2012) Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
SchwabRMOatesWE (1991) Community composition and the provision of local public goods: A normative analysis. Journal of Public Economics44(2): 217–237.
40.
TeskePSchneiderMMintromM. (1993) Establishing the micro foundations of a macro theory: Information, movers, and the competitive local market for public goods. The American Political Science Review87(3): 702–713.
41.
ThorsnesPReifelJW (2007) Tiebout dynamics: Neighborhood response to a central-city/suburban house-price differential. Journal of Regional Science47(4): 693–719.
42.
TieboutCM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64(5): 416–424.
43.
TieboutCM (1961) An economic theory of fiscal decentralization. In: Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research (ed.) Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 79–96.
44.
TurnerMARossSLGalsterGC. (2002) Discrimination in Metropolitan Housing Markets: National Results from Phase I HDS 2000. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
